Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Congrats all! On 28/05/13 12:53 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Hi, > >I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by >the 2013 Google Summer of Code: > >"CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ian Duffy > >"Improving CloudStack support in Apache Whirr and Apache Provisi

Review Request: Updated account and domain id for nic secondary ips for shared networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11458/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Murali Reddy. Description

Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2707) use executeBatch instead of persist when Usage Server createNetworkHelperEntry

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11461/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- use executeBatch instead of

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2707) use executeBatch instead of persist when Usage Server createNetworkHelperEntry

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11461/#review21080 --- Commit 2e8d1264a247772b5dfda5bcab26fa5ed384a6d9 in branch refs/heads

[MERGED] UI for nTier 2.0 features

Hi , Since there was no objection in the merge request sent on Friday , I have merged the ui-vpc-redesign branch into master and tested it with latest master . The build is successful and UI works perfectly . This redesign has changed the VPC structure on the UI due to introduction of the Ntier

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/#review21077 --- test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/#review21081 --- First two comments have been repeated, please ignore the duplicates.

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 8:28 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

> On May 28, 2013, 8:22 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py, line 360 > > > > > > create_vm with pf=true has been implemented? Yes, VirtualMachine.create() checks for mode if m

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2620 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Guest vm's nameserver is not set to VRs guest IP address in case of multiple subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21082 --- api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/DnsmasqTO.java

Review Request: add zone wide primary storage tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Des

FirewallRuleResponse vs FirewallResponse

When I createFirewallRule I recieve a FirewallResponse but when I deleteFirewallRule I am expected to pass in an id I recieved as a FirewallRuleResponse? What are these two response types? They look very similar. Is this legacy? Can we clean it up and standardize to a single FirewallRuleResponse?

Re: Review Request: generalisation of network code (needed for CLOUDSTACK-1532)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 9:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy a

Re: FirewallRuleResponse vs FirewallResponse

But, this will break backward compatibility no ? Maybe change it in the next big release. On 28/05/13 2:50 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >When I createFirewallRule I recieve a FirewallResponse but when I >deleteFirewallRule I am expected to pass in an id I recieved as a >FirewallRuleResponse?

Re: Review Request: generalisation of network code (needed for CLOUDSTACK-1532)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 9:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy,

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 9:45 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty

Re: FirewallRuleResponse vs FirewallResponse

Sure, I'm looking for the rationale behind the two classes. That'll help to determine how much of compatibility (if any) is broken because most of them are similar. Also there are specific response types for the LoadBalancer (ApplicationLoadBalancerResponse), GlobalLoadBalancerResponse which are re

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/#review21084 --- test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py

Unsupported System VM OS Debian 7.0 Wheezy on xenserver 6.1

Hi all, I tried installing xs-tools on system vm but I could not able to do that because we use Debain 7.0 Wheezy which is not supported by Xenserver 6.1 Detected `Debian 7.0' (debian version 7). Unable to install guest packages for distribution Debian 7.0 (debian). Unknown Debian variant "7"

NicSecondaryIp

There is a ControlledEntity named NicSecondaryIp that is representing a nic on the VM. The APIs that this entity is acted upon by are : addIpToNic and removeIpFromNic. Should this entity be more appropriately be renamed to just Nic? There is also a NicIpAlias entity that seems to fit this too. -

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

> On May 28, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py, line 382 > > > > > > Even the root disk snapshots are deleted. > > And since the VM will be successfully moved i

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 10:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shett

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On 05/23/2013 06:35 PM, Chip Childers wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store bran

SystemVMInstanceResponse or SystemVmResponse

Just the migrateSystemVm command returns a response with SystemVmInstanceResponse. The other systemVM operations return the regular SystemVmResponse. What is the reason for this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2715 A patch is attached in the bug report that fixes this. I'll appl

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Awesome, looking forward to seeing some good work done this summer. The students should register on Jira and review board. A good resource to kick start has been but up by Sebastian and can be accessed here : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Universit y -abhi

Re: Review Request: Patch 2: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 1:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: Update L10N strings for 4.1 (Italian and Chinese) from Transifex to repo

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11433/#review21090 --- Ship it! committed to 4.1 with 7f8b4773e5bb98c23f1a024a2a2a832c69c2

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 1:05 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: Config value has to be encrypted for Hidden category configs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11369/#review21092 --- Ship it! committed to 4.1 as a65c36a39138308f95049a815fa99f4da0bbde

[VOTE][CANCELLED] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Cancelling this vote officially. On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:54:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote. > > The changes from round 3 are two commits related to DEB packaging. > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https:

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:53:47AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by > > the 2013 Google Summer of Code: > > > > "CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ia

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21091 --- Commit a65c36a39138308f95049a815fa99f4da0bbde1a in branch refs/heads

Re: [ACS41][PATCH REQ]

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:02:27PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1. > # This was my bug, sorry. > > Branch: master > > commit e9a6d47316d8de90eb662e9938ea7fcbe0ee0596 > Author: Hiroaki KAWAI > Date: Tue May 28 11:55:21 2013 +0900 > > agent: fix network.bridge

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1644) INFRA-5977: Testing ASFBot updates to reviewboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9876/#review21089 --- Testing svngit2jira via python 2, please ignore - ASF Subversion and

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On 28/05/13 4:23 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > > >On 05/23/2013 06:35 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +, Edison Su wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 02:23 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Abhi, Kelcey, Hugo and Myself will be their mentors but if you see > questions from any of these five students feel free to jump in and help > them out. Congrats to all! Glad we're participating. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zo

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Sat, May 25, 2013, at 09:52 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > In my opinion, an RM should have some autonomy in management. Is there some instance you've noticed the release manager not having sufficient autonomy? I'd be curious to know where the RM needs more autonomy than we've had so far. Best,

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote. The changes from round 4 are related to DEB packaging, some translation strings, and a functional patch to make bridge type optional during the agent setup (for backward compatibility). Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:28:20AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:31:46AM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote: > > Hi Prasanna, > > > > The API is to update a VirtualMachine's affinity group associations > > - it's not really an update operation on an affinity group - hence >

[DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP

In CloudStack, currently there are four distinct operations available with public IP's at network service and manager layers. 1. Acquiring a public IP from zone level public IP pool 2. Associate acquired public IP with a guest network/VPC 3. Disassociate an associated public IP with a

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

Agree with Wido. This would be a great feature to have in 4.2. Yes, its a lot of change and probably needs more education from Edison and Min maybe through code walkthroughs, documentation, IRC meetings but I am +1 for this to make it to 4.2 and would go as far to say that I would even volunteer fo

Re: LDAP auth broken?

Abhi, I looked again at the query this morning, and you are right, the filter was incorrect. There was a weird char in it. Fixing the filter corrected the issue. Sorry for the spam :) Francois On 2013-05-28 12:46 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: Check if the query filter is going to get the

Re: [DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP

Hi Murali, I have an internal issue, 'Cannot add additional network range to NVP isolated network', meaning the user wants to expand a guest network. Is it an idea to integrate this question into your design? I realize that you are adressing the API mainly but the relation seems so close that I am

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Yes, congrats all and welcome onboard. While working on these projects please do not hesitate to ask questions. Please add/correct documentation, ask questions on coding practices and logic, fix/file bugs if you see any. Hope you guys have a lot of fun :) On 28/05/13 12:53 PM, "Venkata SwamyBabu B

IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)

Hey all, The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so. Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether we had enough interest to sustain the meeting time. Thoughts, suggestions, comme

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Venkata! Congrats and welcome aboard! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Sailaja! Congrats! Welcome aboard! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-2621 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Failed to delete guest IP range from a new subnet/C

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#review21095 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java

Re: patchviasocket: Why in Perl and not native Java?

On Sun, May 26, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do we want to standardize and say that if it can't be in Java, and it > can't be in Bash, it has to be in Python? This seems like it'd be a good discussion to have - but really ought to be broken out into a separate thread so it's obviou

Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:44:10AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC > tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so. > Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether > we had

Re: Review Request: add zone wide primary storage tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 3:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santh

RE: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)

I will attend -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:44 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29) Hey all, The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC tomorrow. We

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

All, I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review thus far (https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/). TL;DR is that this patch has a number of significant issues which can be summarized as follows: 1. While it appeas that the requirement of NFS for secondary storage

RE: 4.1 release manager

I will tentatively say yes - pending my discussion with Chip on Thursday on the process. Regards ilya > -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:40 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.1 release manager > > On Sat,

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2702) unable to install XenServer Support Package (CSP) on Xen cloud platform 1.6

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:52:20PM +, Dean Kamali (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13668307#comment-13668307 > ] > > Dean Kamali commented on CLOUDSTACK-270

[MERGE] Storage migration support VMware into MASTER

Hi, I would like to merge the storage migration support to VMware into master. This is incremental piece of work to extend storage migration support to VMware. Earlier storage migration feature work was done & merged into master as part of JIRA ticket CLOUDSTACK-659. This work just extends th

Re: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:23:20PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote: > And if not how do I manipulate the order of tests? IMO, tests should *never* require that they execute in a specific order. That's what the setup and teardown phases of test execution are for. If you find this is the issue, let's fi

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

I deployed the latest master today , infact moments back , but build was a success ! -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLS

RE: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today. Thanks, Anthony From: Anthony Xu Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alena Prokharchyk; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com); Anthony Xu Subject: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master Hi all,

RE: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 1:27 AM To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website Hi, After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the "Packt Bo

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:44:59PM +, Anthony Xu wrote: > I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today. +1

RE: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)

Joe, Swamped with $dayjob, I will try to attend, but I have nothing to report. Thanks Ilya > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:52 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

+1 Wei 2013/5/28 Anthony Xu > I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today. > > > Thanks, > Anthony > > From: Anthony Xu > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Alena Prokharchyk; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com); Anthony Xu > Subject: [MERGE] security

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

Chip, It is ok. Hope 4.1 will be released soon. 2013/5/23 Chip Childers > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > Guys, > > > > Is it possible to merge this branch to 4.1? > > > > Wei > > Wei - IMO we need to wait for 4.2 for that feature to come back into the > product.

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Chip, > > It is ok. Hope 4.1 will be released soon. Feel free to test the RC and vote! -chip

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 While I appreciate the don't-play-favorites sentiments, I do feel that we are over thinking this issue. If favoritism becomes an issue, we can revisit. At that point, I'd imagine that there would be half-a-dozen books on CloudStack and listing/not listing them won't make much difference -- so w

Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

Hey All, I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make sure I understand the process and what is required for submitting my code for review. I have read this and am comfortable with its content: http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html You can check out mor

Re: Regarding the RPS and RFS support in the virtual router.

The test is invalid -- it is only testing one core. RPS steers the packet processing to a CPU core based on the hash of the TCP/UDP 4-tuple in the header (src addr, dest addr, src port dst port). With a single-stream test, the hash will send every packet to the same cpu RFS is similarly based on t

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

Agree with the "we don't have to get this perfect right away" approach. On 28 May 2013 18:17, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > +1 > > While I appreciate the don't-play-favorites sentiments, I do feel that we > are over thinking this issue. If favoritism becomes an issue, we can > revisit. At that poin

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 binding. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:48 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following

Re: Question about Review Request

Mike - the problem is that you have two patches (2 commits) in the same patch file. Here's what to do (choose 1): 1) Squash down to 1 commit / patch and submit it. OR 2) Create a review for the first patch, and then a follow up review for the second patch. On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:27:13PM -

Re: Question about Review Request

Thanks, Chip! I didn't know that would be a problem. If you know off hand, can you tell me how to do a squash? Thanks again! On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Mike - the problem is that you have two patches (2 commits) in the same > patch file. > > Here's what to do (ch

Re: Question about Review Request

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:57:32AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Thanks, Chip! > > I didn't know that would be a problem. > > If you know off hand, can you tell me how to do a squash? > > Thanks again! In your branch, do: git rebase -i HEAD~2 You're editor will pull up something like the fol

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > Hey All, > I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make sure > I understand the process and what is required for submitting my code for > review. > > I have read this and am comfortable with its content: > ht

Re: [DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:56:21PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > In CloudStack, currently there are four distinct operations available with > public IP's at network service and manager layers. > > 1. Acquiring a public IP from zone level public IP pool > 2. Associate acquired public IP with

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Unit tests are ran in random order because each unit test should be self-sufficient. I'm saying I've seen cases where unit tests aren't written to be self-sufficient and that's why an unit test fails sometimes and passes sometimes. In those cases, we should fix the unit test and not the orde

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

Sebastien, Nope, we don't do votes on the users@ list. That list is just for user support. Decision making happens on dev@*, and if users want to take part in that, they can subscribe. * Or marketing@, private@, and security@ On 27 May 2013 08:53, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On May 24, 201

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update - 9 days left to freeze

I would also like to close on the development of the systemvm. AFAIK, it has been undergoing some level of validation. It is desirable to 'freeze' the bits of the system vm image as early as possible. The only 'unfreeze' I anticipate is when HAProxy returns to wheezy. As of today the system vm con

Re: Unsupported System VM OS Debian 7.0 Wheezy on xenserver 6.1

I guess the question would be "why do you want xs-tools on the system vm"? Other than xs tools, Debian wheezy should work just fine on XS 6.1 As a point of reference, Debian squeeze wasn't supported on XS 5.6 (the first release on which the "old" system vm was deployed) either and worked just fine

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:18:51PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > I will tentatively say yes - pending my discussion with Chip on Thursday on > the process. Outback - if you want to help, that's still a possibility (see my note about how you could help). Ilya has the commit-bit, so he can be the

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:56AM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review > thus far (https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/). TL;DR is that this patch > has a number of significant issues which can be summarized as follows

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:53:47AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted > by > > > the 2013

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:58:07AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hey Chip, we had created tickets on infra and now we've a new github mirror > which is up to date: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack > They somehow did not get rid of the incubator-cloudstack/ repo on github > which is very behind

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

Just my view: Lobbying is something we should avoid from what I understand from the Apache culture. This is not to flame anybody or anything, I've recognized may be the issue is in me; sorry but I've very strong sentiments and emotions around opensource software development, I've decreased my contr

Re: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:23PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Hi Chip, > > Thanks for clarifying the IP info required. I'll take a closer look ASAP. Awesome, thanks! > Citrix have provided some effort for a suitable console proxy, which needs to > be integrated into the System VM. (Volun

[MERGE] zone wide primary storage support for VMware into MASTER

Hi, I would like to merge support for zone wide primary storage for VMware resources in CloudStack deployment. This is incremental piece of work to extend zone wide primary storage pool support to VMware. Earlier zone wide primary storage support was merged into master as part of JIRA ticket C

vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Hey everybody, I downloaded a 4.2 snapshot today and have been trying to get it going without much luck. I got an error about systemvm.iso not being found, so I manually copied it to the problem spot from a 4.1 tree I have laying around. However, vhd-util is not found, and I am getting a scope

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test functionality? On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > > Hey All, > > I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make > sure

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test > functionality? Yup: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python

4.0.2 nonoss , can't connect to vsphere

As suggested on the user@ forum, i'm posting here. Hi, I built 4.0.2 on centos 6.4, and worked my way through the issues. I think I have correctly created the rpms required to integrate with netscaler and vsphere. However when I try to connect to vsphere I get an error '431 Could not find corre

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

Thank you... On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test > > functionality? > > Yup: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvi

Re: vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Here is the stack trace: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:) We cannot locate /home/dlamotta/Dev/cloudstack-4.2-cfd8056/client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xenserver60/../vhd-util INFO [network.security.SecurityGroupL

Re: vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Search for vhd-util on this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch It explains what to do (hopefully). On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:49:51PM +, La Motta, David wrote: > Here is the stack trace: > > > WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (D

Re: Question about Review Request

Thanks, Chip! I was busy talking to a customer about CloudStack for a while, but should be able to re-submit my patch soon. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:57:32AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Thanks, Chip! > > > > I didn't know that would

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On May 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Sebastien, > > Nope, we don't do votes on the users@ list. That list is just for user > support. > > Decision making happens on dev@*, and if users want to take part in that, > they can subscribe. This needs to be made clearer then, otherwise

RE: PLEASE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Kishan, Git blame shows the file is checked in by you. Can you take a look at why it's failing? Thanks. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 9:39 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: PLEASE: maste

Re: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

thanks fellows, It is clear to me, what hte problem and the course to take is. I will report more on it tomorrow regards, Daan On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Unit tests are ran in random order because each unit test should be > self-sufficient. I'm saying I've seen case

Re: vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Cool, thanks. I saw a reference to a NetApp plugin on that page. Would you know who from NetApp was working on this, if anybody? David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix NetApp 919.476.5042 dlamo...@netapp.com On May 28, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Chip Childe

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

I am not a commiter and did not know there where things at all that I could vote on. Nice to hear. What things? How to recognise them? regards, Daan On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On May 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > > Sebastien, > > > > Nope, we

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

Users are *by definition* people who do not vote. The minute a user votes they become a developer. ;) I agree with you that interaction with the user@ list should use inclusive language, and should call for participation in the decision-making process that happens on dev@. Daan, monitor this list

  1   2   >