On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:28:20AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:31:46AM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote: > > Hi Prasanna, > > > > The API is to update a VirtualMachine's affinity group associations > > - it's not really an update operation on an affinity group - hence > > the odd naming. The resource the API is acting on is a VM. > > > Please suggest any other name that seems meaningful and fits the > > conventions... > > Yes I imagined it would be something to do with the VM. But > deleteAffinityGroup&vmid=<uuid> then got me wondering. If it is > 'updateVmAffinity' then it should be 'deleteVmAffinity' as well? Or does > the delete also remove the affinity group after dissociating the group > from the VM? I think not - because the affinity group could be > associated with multiple VMs? > :wq > Bump Prachi - looking for your thoughts on this one.
-- Prasanna., ------------------------ Powered by BigRock.com
