Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-06-11 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:50:09PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > The jenkins build of the systemvm has been failing for a couple of days. > Can someone clean it up? Looks like the 64-bit job was enabled and left a hdd hanging. There was a mistake in the grep pattern that returned the hung disk

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-06-10 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
The jenkins build of the systemvm has been failing for a couple of days. Can someone clean it up? On 6/7/13 5:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >This is now done. >http://s.apache.org/wy > > > >On 5/28/13 3:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >wrote: > >>Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-06-07 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Installed the oneiric Ubuntu haproxy for ours and it seems to work. On May 28, 2013 4:07 PM, "Milamber" wrote: > Hello Chiradeep, > > Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): > http://lists.debian.org/**debian-backports-changes/2013/**05/msg00050.html

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-06-07 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
This is now done. http://s.apache.org/wy On 5/28/13 3:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well. > >On 5/28/13 3:07 PM, "Milamber" wrote: > >>Hello Chiradeep, >> >>Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): >>http://lists.debia

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-28 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well. On 5/28/13 3:07 PM, "Milamber" wrote: >Hello Chiradeep, > >Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): >http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2013/05/msg00050.html >http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/ha

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-28 Thread Milamber
Hello Chiradeep, Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2013/05/msg00050.html http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/haproxy Milamber Le 11/05/2013 01:14, Chiradeep Vittal a ecrit : Fixed by fetching haproxy 1.4.8-

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-10 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Fixed by fetching haproxy 1.4.8-1 from squeeze-backports On 5/9/13 4:16 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible. > >or just use sid packages if possible? > >dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6. > >--Sheng > > >On Thu, May 9, 2013 a

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-09 Thread Sheng Yang
Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible. or just use sid packages if possible? dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6. --Sheng On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > How old? When did it disappear? > > I pr

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-09 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
How old? When did it disappear? I propose using the Ubuntu package. In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh wget http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubunt u2.1_i386.deb dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb Also do we know if the s

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-09 Thread Sheng Yang
No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for now. --Sheng On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? > > On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > > >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-09 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html > >The new maintainer t

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-05-09 Thread Sheng Yang
HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule of recovering yet. That's why depends o

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

2013-04-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare system VM > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for different > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the services > installed on a