Fixed by fetching haproxy 1.4.8-1 from squeeze-backports On 5/9/13 4:16 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible. > >or just use sid packages if possible? > >dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6. > >--Sheng > > >On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> How old? When did it disappear? >> >> I propose using the Ubuntu package. >> In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh >> >> wget >> >>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubu >>nt >> u2.1_i386.deb >> >> dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb >> >> Also do we know if the system vm template contains the version of >>dnsmasq >> that is known to work for ipv6 support? >> >> -- >> Chiradeep >> >> On 5/9/13 3:48 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >> >No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for >>now. >> > >> >--Sheng >> > >> > >> >On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >> >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? >> >> >> >> On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is >> >>missing. >> >> > >> >> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 >> >> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html >> >> > >> >> >The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no >>schedule >> >>of >> >> >recovering yet. >> >> > >> >> >That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is >> >>dangerous. >> >> > >> >> >--Sheng >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < >> >> >> agneya2...@hotmail.com >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare >> >>system >> >> >>VM >> >> >> > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for >> >> >> different >> >> >> > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the >>services >> >> >> > installed on all the system VM templates meant for different >> >> >>hypervisors >> >> >> > should be same ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh, if >>it's >> >> >>there >> >> >> those pkgs will be installed. >> >> >> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my >>system >> >>and >> >> >> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -abhi >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
