Installed the oneiric Ubuntu haproxy for ours and it seems to work. On May 28, 2013 4:07 PM, "Milamber" <milam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello Chiradeep, > > Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): > http://lists.debian.org/**debian-backports-changes/2013/**05/msg00050.html<http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2013/05/msg00050.html> > http://packages.debian.org/**wheezy-backports/haproxy<http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/haproxy> > > Milamber > > Le 11/05/2013 01:14, Chiradeep Vittal a ecrit : > >> Fixed by fetching haproxy 1.4.8-1 from squeeze-backports >> >> On 5/9/13 4:16 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> >> Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible. >>> >>> or just use sid packages if possible? >>> >>> dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6. >>> >>> --Sheng >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >>> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> How old? When did it disappear? >>>> >>>> I propose using the Ubuntu package. >>>> In tools/appliance/definitions/**systemvmtemplate/postinstall.**sh >>>> >>>> wget >>>> >>>> http://security.ubuntu.com/**ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/** >>>> haproxy_1.4.18-0ubu<http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubu> >>>> nt >>>> u2.1_i386.deb >>>> >>>> dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_**i386.deb >>>> >>>> Also do we know if the system vm template contains the version of >>>> dnsmasq >>>> that is known to work for ipv6 support? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chiradeep >>>> >>>> On 5/9/13 3:48 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for >>>>> >>>> now. >>>> >>>>> --Sheng >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >>>>> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is >>>>>>> >>>>>> missing. >>>>>> >>>>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-**bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447> >>>>>>> http://lists.debian.org/**debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.**html<http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no >>>>>>> >>>>>> schedule >>>> >>>>> of >>>>>> >>>>>>> recovering yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is >>>>>>> >>>>>> dangerous. >>>>>> >>>>>>> --Sheng >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < >>>>>>>> agneya2...@hotmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> system >>>>>> >>>>>>> VM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> template. Is the path used to create the templates different for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> services >>>> >>>>> installed on all the system VM templates meant for different >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hypervisors >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> should be same ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/**systemvmtemplate/postinstall.**sh, >>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> it's >>>> >>>>> there >>>>>>>> those pkgs will be installed. >>>>>>>> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> system >>>> >>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -abhi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> >
