gt;
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul Angus
> >> VP Technology , ShapeBlue
> >>
> >>
> >> t: @cloudyangus
> >>
> >> e: paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> >> | w: www.s
bad.
> > > >>
> > > >> We very much want this to be a community 'thing', and we're happy to
> > > work
> > > >> with everyone/anyone to get there.
> > > >>
> > > >> Any ideas on the most effective way to have a numb
e most effective way to have a number of people on
> this -
> > >> I'm all ears.
> > >> In the meantime I'll try to make good on my promises to get our ideas
> > >> visible to everyone...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >&g
veryone...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Paul Angus
> >> VP Technology , ShapeBlue
> >>
> >>
> >> t: @cloudyangus
> >>
> >> e: paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> >> |
VP Technology , ShapeBlue
>>
>>
>> t: @cloudyangus
>>
>> e: paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
>> | w: www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
tp://www.shapeblue.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Will Stevens
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Important Pe
ww.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Important Pending Items
@Paul and @Bharat, th
d any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are no
I appreciate the help and look forward to working with you. :)
I agree with Koushik that getting some form of CI in place to validate PRs
should be a priority. What Bharat is working on looks very promising to
solve this.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420
I think that it is better to sort out the CI stuff for validating PRs before
moving ahead with the next release.
There was a recent mail from Bharat on a sample CI BVT run. As I understand it
is still WIP, but once the remaining items are fixed it will be useful for
validating PRs.
Also I can b
I am willing to step up as the RM for 4.9. I need to get caught up on the
workflow and what CI we have in place etc... Any help getting caught up on
how we are currently working would be appreciated. I need to get my lab
setup to start testing and working through the different PRs, so I am still
ender if you
believe you have received this email in error.
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Important Pending Items
Hi Se
or.
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Important Pending Items
Hi Sebastien,
As Raja said, we are actively working on it and we will share the code on
github soon.
Hi Sebastien,
As Raja said, we are actively working on it and we will share the code on
github soon.
Thanks,
Bharat.
> On 11-Feb-2016, at 2:41 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On item (3) - the BVTs have been running consistently (with same passrates)
> and haven't had the tim
Hi Sebastien,
On item (3) - the BVTs have been running consistently (with same passrates) and
haven't had the time to automate the process of reporting to an external site.
Bharat and Sanjeev are working on CI - running BVTs/Regression, working on
getting it run automatically and consistent
15 matches
Mail list logo
