I appreciate the help and look forward to working with you.  :)

I agree with Koushik that getting some form of CI in place to validate PRs
should be a priority.  What Bharat is working on looks very promising to
solve this.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Koushik Das <koushik....@citrix.com> wrote:

> I think that it is better to sort out the CI stuff for validating PRs
> before moving ahead with the next release.
> There was a recent mail from Bharat on a sample CI BVT run. As I
> understand it is still WIP, but once the remaining items are fixed it will
> be useful for validating PRs.
>
> Also I can be the 2nd RM along with Will for the next release.
>
> -Koushik
>
> > On 25-Feb-2016, at 10:13 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am willing to step up as the RM for 4.9.  I need to get caught up on
> the
> > workflow and what CI we have in place etc...  Any help getting caught up
> on
> > how we are currently working would be appreciated.  I need to get my lab
> > setup to start testing and working through the different PRs, so I am
> still
> > a little ways out from being able to actually get things moving.
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Morning folks,
> >>
> >> We have several crucial pending items, that we need to resolve before
> >> moving on:
> >>
> >> 1- We need an RM for master ( just saw some commits there that should be
> >> reverted or merged properly in other branches).
> >>
> >> 2- We need to automate writing release notes, pushing/tagging new docs
> >> when release come out and announcing releases on website. Currently
> neither
> >> 4.7 nor 4.8 have been announced.
> >>
> >> 3- CI is still almost inexistent
> >>
> >> -Sebastien
>
>

Reply via email to