command and
answer objects, the agent uses weak typing. Data is left in JSON container
objects.
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: 17 October 2013 16:39
> To:
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons
>
> Agree with
That's a shame, but I could check if I can setup some teleconference gear. If
you are interested. Though the time might be a serious bother depending on your
timezone.
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 okt. 2013, at 17:39, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> I won't be this time.
>
> On Thu
[shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons
I'm not at all against it, I just haven't heard anyone give any reason
as to why. Keep in mind that we'd essentially be asking anyone who
has writt
Marcus,
Okay, well I'll give a fully articulated argument for this eventually.
Regardless, no reason to discourage a hackathon on the topic. Might as well
talk and hack on it a bit and then we will know if it's a terrible idea.
Darren
> On Oct 17, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I'm not at all against it, I just haven't heard anyone give any reason
> as to why. Keep in mind that we'd essentially be asking anyone who
> has written code for the agent to re-do their work (midonet, vxlan,
> storage plugins). My impress
I won't be this time.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> Will you be at CCC? I think it's immensely important and can give plenty of
> good reasons, but too lazy to type at the moment. And I need to do a bit
> more analysis on the scope.
>
> Darren
>
>> On O
Agree with Marcus here.
If we are planning to rewrite, I think that there should be some discussion
around the possibility of making it a direct agent like XS/Vmware. If this is
possible then installing the KVM agent on individual hosts will be eliminated.
On 17-Oct-2013, at 8:49 PM, Marcus Sor
I'd like to throw in the topic of API clients. So specifically what's the
state of clients in python, ruby, java, and go. With the api discovery feature
it should be simple to write dynamic clients that are always up to date with
the api.
Darren
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Sebastien Goasg
Marcus,
Will you be at CCC? I think it's immensely important and can give plenty of
good reasons, but too lazy to type at the moment. And I need to do a bit more
analysis on the scope.
Darren
> On Oct 17, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> I'm not at all against it, I just haven'
I'm not at all against it, I just haven't heard anyone give any reason
as to why. Keep in mind that we'd essentially be asking anyone who
has written code for the agent to re-do their work (midonet, vxlan,
storage plugins). My impression is that people just like the 'feel'
of it being in Python,
+1
Santhosh
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage [kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons
+1 again for KVM in Python!
- Original Message -
From
2013/10/14 Sebastien Goasguen
> -API interfaces (AWS refactor, GCE, OCCI&CIMI standard): Discuss the state
> of our interfaces, plans for future, needs etc. AWS interface might need a
> refactor, GCE is a new interface, OCCI is a standard and Isaac Chiang has
> developed an interface. We are miss
+1 again for KVM in Python!
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Shepherd"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:54:26 PM
Subject: Re: Cloudstack collab Hackathons
+1 for kvm in python. I'd like to take it a step further. I'd like to
+1 for kvm in python. I'd like to take it a step further. I'd like to create
a framework for adding compute and storage with python drivers. The first
implementation should just happen to be libvirt/kvm. So yeah, I'll be
interested in this. I'll be landing around 10am so don't know what time
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> The CloudStack collaboration conference is right around the corner. The
>> first day of the conference will be dedicated to workshops and a hackathon.
>>
>> I'm
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys,
> >
>
Hi
> > The CloudStack collaboration conference is right around the corner. The
> first day of the conference will be dedicated to workshops and a hackathon.
> >
On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> The CloudStack collaboration conference is right around the corner. The first
> day of the conference will be dedicated to workshops and a hackathon.
>
> I'm curious which developers are planning to attend the hackthon and wha
I plan on attending the hackathon.
I expect to be participating in the automated testing discussion since I'd
like to develop tests for the SolidFire plug-in I built and continue to
enhance (and see how I can leverage a SAN in my lab for these tests and
still have the tests kicked off in response
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe
contains a provisionary list. You can add there if you have wiki
access or ask in this thread as Hugo suggests.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> The CloudStack collaboration conference is righ
19 matches
Mail list logo
