>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:21 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs
>>
>>
>> -1 on the proposal to lower pri
).
> - republish definition of defect priority so community is aware on the proper
> categorization of defects (I can publish this as well on wiki.
>
> Thanks
> /Sudha
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday,
well on wiki.
Thanks
/Sudha
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:11 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs
Not well formatted but is this what you want?
Key Summary Reporter Assignee Updated
CLOUDSTACK
Not well formatted but is this what you want?
Key Summary Reporter Assignee Updated
CLOUDSTACK-6754
SSVM not responding with S3 secondary sotre
Pavan Kumar Bandarupally Min Chen 26/May/14
Actions
CLOUDSTACK-6755
[OVS] Can't create more than 7 GRE tunnel networks in xen cluster
Sanjeev N Murali
On May 26, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I
> can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I
> would really get some consent on this.
Can you send the list of those blockers to the list with th
I didn't get any reactions on this second proposal and though I know I
can force discussion on it by just starting to implement it as well I
would really get some consent on this.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I will start implementing this on Monday.
>
> Also I would l
I will start implementing this on Monday.
Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been
agreed on, on list.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08
To: dev
Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old block
