Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159668471
@bhaisaab can you bring this to the list ? I think it would be best
discussed there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159605020
With all respect to shapeblue team, contributions and efforts,
-1 with this current PR. Adding "official" in the source section doesn't
make sense. This
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159593139
â¬0,02: I think a great benefit of having shapeblue supplying their own
packages is them being able to backort features for their customers. I would
like th
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159589449
@abhinandanprateek Please dont get me wrong. This is not a question of
good or bad. I am not denying anyone's part in community neither am I saying
that x is go
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159586783
@karuturi shapeblue folks are also part of community like citrix or sbp
folks. by that definition the shapeblue packages are as good. it is just that
sh
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159585876
@karuturi there is the issue with noredist under ASF though, how about we
move this as a discuss thread to dev@? there are more changes that could be
discussed
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159583159
well, it got evolved during the 4.0 release and no one objected.
May be, first we should start a discuss/vote first on what can we include.
community
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159578241
@karuturi reference to the vote/agreement regarding apt-get.eu repositories
being agreed as some sort of "official" distribution. I do not recall the
community
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159576804
@jburwell apt-get is just a temporary spot until we get to
packages.cloudstack.apache.org
yes, we should mention that these are not official but just the rpms
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159576408
@abhinandanprateek
I think they were added silently in the first place.
We are doing one rpm build as a community for user convenience(which was
discusse
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159575622
@karuturi the repos currently listed on the [Downloads
page](http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html) are not under community
control. Furthermore, the mann
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159573954
As I see it either we do not put any non-official build on the project
page. If we are doing it for users convenience we should all such repositories
th
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159568400
I agree with @remibergsma
-1 for adding more repos which community may not have control. This will
definitely confuse users. Since these are build from the s
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159543089
According to @ke4qqq we should be able to use packages.apache.org (see
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201506.mbox/%3CCAKprHVYH+m-A2g=cj
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159539414
Let's hear it from @ke4qqq as VP of infra.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159539257
I think it is quite fair. The source is the official release, and the
packages are not official.
I don't know that we will ever be able to offer official packag
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159530377
Stating 3rd party I agree with. I just don't want the confusion of having
different company names and people saying on the list they use "the shape blue
versi
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159526803
@remibergsma as a project we don't ship official repository or packages
yet, until that happens we need to state that the packages/link we've provided
are 3rd pa
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159526854
@remibergsma If we state that packages are 3rd party it gives sense (imho)
to inform who makes those packages. the regular ones from apt-get.eu could be
mention
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159526424
@bhaisaab what do you want to achieve? What's different with the shapeblue
packages? Why mentioning company names? It's highly confusing if you ask me,
especi
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20
downloads: State packages on downloads page are 3rd party
- Adds statement that packages on the download page are not official
releases
similar to Cassandra's page (https://cassandra.a
22 matches
Mail list logo
