Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159605020
With all respect to shapeblue team, contributions and efforts,
-1 with this current PR. Adding "official" in the source section doesn't
make sense. This is the main site of the project, it's expected to be the
official releases. For third party repos, I don't think apt-get.eu repos
should be listed there as it's maintain by the cloudstack community not a
single entity such as shapeblue one. shapeblue could be listed in a third party
section, but why a shapeblue repo, how different it is compare to the community
one or event Citrix cloudplatform. Then why cloudplatform would not be listed
there too?
So far, I saw lots of confusion introduced in all the documentation
regarding repo urls because urls keep swapping between shapeblue.com and
cloudstack.apt-get.eu between release. It make documentation a bit weird and
look like an unstable project. I don't think shapeblue.com repos should be
listed in the general cloudstack documentation, but can be listed in a "third
party distributions" section of the download page.
I don't see shapeblue.com repo as a community repo but as a vendor repo, as
oppose to cloudstack.apt-get.eu which is a community driven repo not backed by
a vendor.
Maybe we could have download page heading like this?:
```
<h4>Source Release</h4>
<h4>Community Packages</h4>
<h4>Third-Party Distributions</h4>
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
