Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
>> -Original Message- >> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:21 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs >> >> >> -1 on the proposal to lower pri

RE: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-26 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
). > - republish definition of defect priority so community is aware on the proper > categorization of defects (I can publish this as well on wiki. > > Thanks > /Sudha > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday,

RE: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-26 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
well on wiki. Thanks /Sudha -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:11 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs Not well formatted but is this what you want? Key Summary Reporter Assignee Updated CLOUDSTACK

Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-26 Thread Daan Hoogland
-- >>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 >>> To: dev >>> Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs >>> >>> LS, >>> >>> There are several blocker bugs registered for 4.4 th

Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-26 Thread sebgoa
>> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 >> To: dev >> Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs >> >> LS, >> >> There are several blocker bugs registered for 4

Re: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-26 Thread Daan Hoogland
; Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been > agreed on, on list. > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 > To: dev > Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs &g

RE: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-23 Thread Daan Hoogland
I will start implementing this on Monday. Also I would like to propose that nothing is a blocker unless it has been agreed on, on list. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 22 mei 2014 10:08 To: dev Subject: [ACS44][PROPOSAL] old

[ACS44][PROPOSAL] old blocker bugs

2014-05-22 Thread Daan Hoogland
LS, There are several blocker bugs registered for 4.4 that have not been touched for over a week. I seems strange to me that a blocker would be left alone for so long and I therefor propose to reduce priority of blockers that have not been touched for over a week to trivial. I have mailed reporter