Re: Reg CLOUDSTACK-8616

Hi Rohit, Indeed. I was about to write a comment on his review. Funny that in 2015 nobody, not even I who wrote the code, noticed. :) Cheers, Wilder > On 14 Feb 2018, at 11:40, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > ... for reference, the current code: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.11/syst

Re: Reg CLOUDSTACK-8616

Hi Jayakarteek, It’s been a long time I haven’t look at that code, but I will have a look. Cheers, Wilder Rodrigues Machine Learning Engineer City AI Ambassador +31 6 5050 2255 https://ekholabs.ai/ <https://ekholabs.ai/> https://amsterdam.city.ai/ <https://amsterdam.city.ai/> >

Re: Back to the list

ur @ > apache.org email fwd-ing to your email, change it through > https://id.apache.org. > > > Regards. > > ________ > From: Wilder Rodrigues > Sent: 30 November 2016 14:28:12 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Back to the list &

Re: Back to the list

I might need that filter, Rene! :D Cheers, Wilder On 30 November 2016 at 10:34, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Welcome back Wilder ! > > 2016-11-30 9:58 GMT+01:00 Wilder Rodrigues : > > > Hi there, > > > > I have been away for a while, but would like to let you now that I wi

Back to the list

Hi there, I have been away for a while, but would like to let you now that I will try to follow a a bit more closely the development around CloudStack. :) After I left Schuberg Philis I forgot to change my email address on the dev-list. It means that I might have missed some messages. Sorry for t

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

ilto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs > > >> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> It’s

[Proposal] Concerning open PRs

Hi all, It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit off the radar, but from next week I will start helping to get some of those

Re: [PROPOSAL] Freeze everything until we get CI

+1 , Sebastien! From the last 12 PRs that were merged, only 2 had integration tests executed against. I don’t understand why the rush to merge things that were not properly tested. It already looks like a broken master and 4 votes to get 1 release through every 9 months. I should not make such

Re: New release manager wanted

Thanks for ll the hard work and support, Remi! We worked quite some weekends testing PRs in order to get them merged properly, following the guidelines: 2 LGTM (1 being code review; 1 being integration tests) I hope that the same principle will now be taken as a standard. Thanks again! Cheers,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Boris Roman Schrijver

Better later than never! :) Welcome, dude! Let’s make this boat rock! Cheers, Wilder > On 19 Jan 2016, at 13:15, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack is pleased to > announce that Boris Roman Schrijver has accepted our inv

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Boris Roman Schrijver

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack is pleased to announce that Boris Roman Schrijver has accepted our invitation to join the PMC. Please join me in congratulating him. On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC Wilder Rodrigues

Re: CS 4.7.0 RC1: bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory

Hi there… What kind of hypervisor do you have? Cheers, Wilder > On 16 Dec 2015, at 09:15, Milamber wrote: > > Hello, > > On my 4.7.0 RC1 test environment, I've this warning message: > 2015-12-15 23:57:35,165 WARN [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] > (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f15

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

host. > On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:30, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi Rohit, > > I successfully upgraded from 4.6.2 to 4.7.0. There were no DB changes from > 4.6.1 to 4.6.2, so no need to create am extra java file like > “Upgrade462to470”. > > Are you voting -1 f

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

fg details ? Thanks, Raja -Original Message----- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:03 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0 I will test an upgrade from 4.6.2

Re: BVT report for week of 12/14

Super! Thanks, man! Cheers, Wilder > On 15 Dec 2015, at 12:57, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Ok, will cross check the configurations and rerun them. > > -Original Message- > From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2

Re: BVT report for week of 12/14

Hi Raja, Yes, those were moved and have been tested - as they to smoke tests instead of component. All of them are passing and they have been executed not only by me. There are all green on both KVM and Xen. You can find my DC configurations here: https://github.com/schubergphilis/MCT-shared/b

Re: BVT report for week of 12/14

Raja, We need your help in order to understand what went wrong. Except for the Quota tests, all the others you mentioned have been executed successfully agains master several times last weeks. Could you please past the error messages / exception stack trace and also tell us what kind of enviro

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

skipped because I used only 1 host. > On 15 Dec 2015, at 11:32, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Raja, could you please send the complete BVT report? I don’t understand week > 12/14, as we are in the week 51, I might presume you mention 12th to 14th > December. > > In order

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

Raja, could you please send the complete BVT report? I don’t understand week 12/14, as we are in the week 51, I might presume you mention 12th to 14th December. In order to avoid mistakes, just send the report because we want to see which tests are included in this BVT you guys run. Cheers, Wi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.2

Hi all, Test this RC yesterday and here goes my +1 (binding). Details below: ACS 4.6.2 :: Environment 1 :: * Hardware required: TRUE * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 * One KVM Host on CentOS 7.1 * Agent + Common RPMs built from 4.6.2 source :: Tests Suites Executed :: nosetests --w

Re: Building Cloudstack failing on windows

no need to hard code the path. We can use the “File.separator” as it is being used in the class under test. Cheers, Wilder On 14 Dec 2015, at 11:36, Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: On 12/14/2015 07:25 AM, Sudharma Jain wrote: While building Cloudstack on windows, it fails w

Re: Feature freeze ACS 4.7 next Monday

Hi there cs user, If you put some details on the PR about how to test it, I can help out and, perhaps, even write a test for it. Cheers, Wilder > On 07 Dec 2015, at 15:09, cs user wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Would anyone else be able to give > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1037 a t

Re: Feature freeze ACS 4.7 next Monday

I'm loving it! Hopefully the rVPC Private Gateway will be fixed within the next hour! Few things were not anticipated on the Java side of the code. I have already refactored the NicProfileHelper and some other classes. Deploying a DC and will test it soon. Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

tatus : SUCCESS === ok Test for release public IP address ... === TestName: test_releaseIP | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 42 tests in 8997.361s OK (SKIP=1) (END) On 04 Dec 2015, at 08:48, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wr

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.1

Sorry for the absence… testing the RC now! Cheers, Wilder > On 03 Dec 2015, at 18:52, Glenn Wagner wrote: > > Good day > > +1 > > Centos 6,7 management server > Xenserver 6,2 > NFS storage > > Tests done , > Standard VM tests > Template uploads > ISO uploads > Basic network functions , add a

Re: Hello 4.6.0, now what?!

I won’t be RM, Daan. Will just continue that work I do in the way I do it. Cheers, Wilder > On 17 Nov 2015, at 09:25, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Sebastien, > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > >> >>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 7:

Re: Hello 4.6.0, now what?!

Nice email, Remi! The most important point that everyone has to be aware of: Master is release branch for 4.7 Master has now become the 4.7.0 release branch. Please see PR [2] to make that happen. Soon, we will start accepting all types of Pull Requests again. Bu

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

shift back >> through the git log to find all known CVE fixes and add each hash to a file >> representing the commits that must be present. Our release tests then >> perform a git tag —contains for each has to ensure that no CVE fixes have >> been missed. >>>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

3 0542 > http://www.shapeblue.com | @ShapeBlue > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS > > > >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >> :( >> >> Sad to hear that just that late in the release process, John

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

:( Sad to hear that just that late in the release process, John. Even worse to hear that it was already happening in 4.5.2 - released some months ago. But no worries! With our new release process, we can do things, in a proper way, quicker than before. The ACS 4.6.1 RC1 will be out within 2 we

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

g Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro/> - Original Message - From: "Wilder Rodrigues" mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, 11 November, 2015 12:39:25 Subject: Re: [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

for release public IP address ... === TestName: test_releaseIP | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 42 tests in 5350.271s OK (SKIP=1) (END) On 11 Nov 2015, at 13:39, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>&

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

Hi Nux, Concerning your second comment: 2 - after upgrading the packages to 4.6.0, the mgmt server complains the 4.5 systemvm is missing - wtf? We explained how the upgrade is done in the issue ==> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9046 The current way ACS does the upgrade requ

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

est_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso > - integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcSite2SiteVpn.test_vpc_site2site_vpn > - :setup > - > integration.smoke.test_vm_snapshots.TestSnapshots.test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot > > -Original Message- > From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Tue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2)

Will start testing now. Back with results + vote tomorrow. Cheers, Wilder > On 10 Nov 2015, at 17:22, Boris Schrijver wrote: > > Hi, > > I've build the DEB packages for Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (14.04). They are available > here: > > https://cloudstack.o.auroraobjects.eu/trusty/cloudstack-agent_4.6

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Boris Schrijver

Congratulations, Boris! Well deserved, dude! Cheers, Wilder > On 09 Nov 2015, at 11:07, Koushik Das wrote: > > Congrats Boris! > > -Original Message- > From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, 9 November 2015 12:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Just a quick note, Sebastian: RAT is running on Master (jenkins.b.a.c.org) which has actually the same code as 4.6.0 RC1. If Pierre Luc push the RC to the Docker hub and we can run real tests, that would be nice, but perhaps too late now. But running a RC against the s

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

ernal_lb.TestInternalLb.test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 >>> //failed due to VM deployment >>> · >>> >>> integration.smoke.test_over_provisioning.TestUpdateOverProvision.test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor >>> //test case issue &

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

The tests are trying to deploy QCOW image based VMs on the Xen Host (see my report, please). Cheers, Wilder > On 06 Nov 2015, at 12:04, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi Raja, > > Concerning the LB + VPN tests, I also faced issues when ran them against > XenServer 6.2. The t

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

issue • integration.smoke.test_vm_snapshots.TestSnapshots.test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot //test case issue • integration.smoke.test_iso.TestISO.test_07_list_default_iso //test case issue :setup //test case issue -Original Message- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 4:19

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

passwd resets right in the time BACKUP becomes MASTER. How > long is this generally? > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Wilder Rodrigues" >> T

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

we saw in the past fixing it all delayed release considerably. Now, how broken is that VPC? :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> - Original Message - From: "Wilder Rodrigues" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Frida

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

it still be part of 4.6.0? Cheers, Wilder On 06 Nov 2015, at 09:17, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi all, My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: * test_vpc_redundant.py on li

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi all, My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: * test_vpc_redundant.py on line 522 - AssertionError: No Master or too many master routers found 0 * test_internal_lb.py lines 712 and 576, when trying to deploy a virtual machine

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi all, I have been busy testing the 4.6.0 RC since last night. The results below are still partial (I still have to test XenServer 6.5), but it looks very promising! My vote will be given once I’m done with Xen65 and upgrade tests. Cheers, Wilder :: Environment 1 :: * Hardware required: TRUE

Re: User vm password gets update only the master VR.

we think that it is ok to have the work around for now fix this later, >>> we can bring the priority down to critical. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bharat. >>> >>> On 05-Nov-2015, at 2:49 pm, Wilder Rodrigues >>> wrote: >>> >

Re: User vm password gets update only the master VR.

Hi Bharat, Please check if what you just mention will work. If it does, then the issue is not a blocker. Cheers, Wilder > On 05 Nov 2015, at 10:09, Bharat Kumar wrote: > > I have’t checked, but form the code it looks like it will work if we reissue > the reset command after the slave become

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

I have CentOS 7.1 RPMs. In case anyone needs them now, I can make available. Testing the 4.6.0 RC as I type. Cheers, Wilder > On 04 Nov 2015, at 18:12, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > The jobs failed due to the git clone failing (time out). I also experience it > is quite slow at the moment. > > It

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

Cool! Thanks a lot! > On 03 Nov 2015, at 12:13, Sanjeev N wrote: > > Ran one test > > Test SSVM Internals ... === TestName: test_03_ssvm_internals | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > > LGTM!! > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < &g

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

PR has been created. Could you please have a look? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1026 Cheers, Wilder On 03 Nov 2015, at 10:59, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Thanks for the details, Sanjeev. Fixing the test now. PR to follow. Cheers, Wild

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

"cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline | xargs | sed \"s/ /\\n/g\" | grep eth0ip= | > sed \"s/\=/ /g\" | awk '{print $2}'",. > It is using eth0ip. However, it should be eth1ip. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

ssage(msg, standardMsg)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 410, in fail raise self.failureException(msg) 'The cached Link Local should be the same as the current Link Local IP, but they are different! Current ==> 10.71.153.33; Cached ==> 1

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

Hi Raja, We don't have vmware/hyperv test environment. Could you please print the whole error message? I'm missing the bit that says: Current ==> %s; Cached ==> %s Without the full message I cannot look further into it. Cheers, Wilder > On 30 Oct 2015, at 17:03, Raja Pullela wrote: > > H

Re: Redundant VPC Virtual Router's state is BACKUP & BACKUP

Looking into it already. Thanks for the note. Cheers, Wilder > On 01 Nov 2015, at 14:08, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > Thanks, we will look into this tomorrow! > > Regards, Remi > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 01 Nov 2015, at 03:48, giraffeg forestg wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> My environment:

Re: CloudStack-8933 changes regressed HyperV and VMware BVTs - 8 tests in test_ssvm.py

Hi Raja, We don't have vmware/hyperv test environment. Could you please print the whole error message? I'm missing the bit that says: Current ==> %s; Cached ==> %s Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Oct 2015, at 17:03, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Hi Wilder > > The changes from this co

Re: BVT report - 10/22

t removed from VR even after disabling statin NAT") AssertionError: IP address isnot removed from VR even after disabling statin NAT I will create an issue and have a look into it. Cheers, Wilder On 22 Oct 2015, at 18:22, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.

Re: BVT report - 10/22

failures, some race condition > when I ran it. > > Best > Raja >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >> Hi Raja, >> >> Internal LB has been working since wilder PR 940 was merged and the test >> itself has als

Re: BVT report - 10/22

Hi Raja, Internal LB has been working since PR 940 was merged and the test itself has also been improved to do proper testing. We have tested that for KVM. What do you mean by "// Issue to be investigated”? Concerning the SSVM/CPVM, yep… working fine again: I created the PR 959 (with extra tes

Re: BVT Report 10/14

I will run test_network on latest master with the following environment now Advance Zone 2 KVM hosts Basic Zone 1 KVM host Cheers, Wilder > On 22 Oct 2015, at 09:01, Remi Bergsma wrote: > > Thanks! > > FYI: 1) is fixed by PR 959 that was merged last night. The tests should now > pass, as sh

Re: BVT report 10/1

Oct 1, 2015, at 4:47 PM, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Sebastien, Remi and Raja… Michael and I just tested that one on 4.4.4, and it also happens there: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697 Thanks for testing this as well as the detail

Re: BVT report 10/1

Sebastien, Remi and Raja… Michael and I just tested that one on 4.4.4, and it also happens there: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697 I already updated the issue and put some logs there. We tested agains out acceptance cloud, which is used to test things before we go to produc

Re: 4.6 blockers

Hi Rajani, Since I’m busy with VOC, I will take a look at this one as well. Assigned to me. Thanks! Cheers, Wilder > On 30 Sep 2015, at 06:14, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > As per the latest BVT reports, CLOUDSTACK-8876 should also be a blocker. > I am bumping the priority of it. > > ~Rajani

Re: BVT report 9/29

Cool! Thanks for retesting! Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 19:07, Raja Pullela wrote: > > Yes, looks like 8891 is resolved based on the comments. I will double check > the tests in regression too - just to make sure. > >> On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Wilder

Re: 4.6 blockers

f you check the log file, I don't think it matters really that it was done > via the UI, could be wrong though. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Wilder Rodrigu

Re: BVT report 9/29

I’m testing 8915 now. The vrrp configuration was broken: instead of CIDR it was configured with IP only - messed up the guest network interfaces. Concerning 8891, it was fixed over the weekend, right? We tested iso nets and VMs got IPs assigned successfully. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015,

Re: 4.6 blockers

Go one, Nux! We haven’t tested the UI for a while! All advanced/basic zones I have created are done via Marvin. Will add that to the list for next tests. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 15:17, Nux! wrote: > > I built fresh RPMs from today's master, but the same story. I created an > is

Re: 4.6 blockers

Hi Sebastien, We are able to use ACS + KVM for a while and I have not faced such a problem as described on CLOUDSTACK-8920 Just as a reminder, we have several tests executed agains KVM with ACS 4.6 on Sunday… all went fine. Cheers, Wilder > On 29 Sep 2015, at 13:36, Sebastien Goasguen wro

Re: Blameless post mortem

s at any frequency. But since concerns have been raised on the quality aspect I feel it needs to be addressed appropriately. Let users take an informed decision on whether to use a particular release or not. I am not saying that postponing is the only option. -Koushik On 28-Sep-2015, at 6:

Re: Blameless post mortem

changes and deal with them accordingly. > > > Regards, > Bharat. > > > On 28-Sep-2015, at 6:02 pm, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > >> Only few tests…. 51 tests against a real environment. >> >> At that time Nux also tested it and we tried to get Paul

Re: Blameless post mortem

Only few tests…. 51 tests against a real environment. At that time Nux also tested it and we tried to get Paul Angus, Geoff and Rohit from Shape Blue to test it as well. Nux found a couple of issues that were reported and fixed (see email below). When I came back from holidays, 4 weeks ago, a P

Re: Blameless post mortem

Hi Bharat, Perhaps you haven’t been away of not reading all the email that were sent to the list in the past. Why am I saying that? just based on your sentence where you said “i wonder why was this ignored when merging the VR refactor code" Is there any particular point you want to make that w

Re: VR refactoring, concerns and a way out ?

s is very disrespectful... Sorry to say that you don't understand the > complexity and impact of this.. Let's not discuss this over an email and > agree to disagree with each other... move on! > >> On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >

Testing ACS master + 7 PRs

Hi all, We have spent some extra time to test the current master in conjunction with 7 PRs that should be fixing some PF/FW/VR problems. There are still issues with the VPC VR when we try to stop/start the router of a VPC which contains tiers/VMs. In that case, 2 of 8 tests failed. Concerning

Re: VR refactoring, concerns and a way out ?

Raja, Do you actually know the amount of blockers we have and how many are VR related? Because I have seen emails from Rajani around concerning the blockers and I don’t see many. So, yes, I really do think your approach is non-sense. I mentioned it before, about 1 week ago, but I think you just

Re: VR refactoring, concerns and a way out ?

Raja, A nice way out would be to have more people knowing about coding and git. I have no idea from where you got this non-sense approach, but I would say it can be compared with the previous git flow the community had: not tests; no PRs; no review. @Ramanath: you, and many others, should have

Re: VPC router issue

Issue is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8878 Cheers, Wilder On 17 Sep 2015, at 10:14, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi Rajani, The last commit from 8 September works: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/

Re: VPC router issue

builds? ~Rajani On 16-Sep-2015, at 10:05 am, Raja Pullela mailto:raja.pull...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi Wilder, BTW, I just checked my setup and it was passing on Sep 9th and was regressed after that. Thanks for checking this out, Raja -Original Message- From: Wilder Rodrigues [ma

Re: VPC router issue

th and was regressed after that. Thanks for checking this out, Raja -Original Message- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 7:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: Remi Bergsma

Re: [PROPOSAL] stable master and 4.6 release

Then we create a 4.6.0 branch, fix all of it and allow people to continue to merge broken code on master. Once we merge 4.6 back to master, most probably the 4.6 stuff won’t work anymore. I have seen it before. I would still say +1 for the freeze and suggest that we get the contributors aligned

Re: [PROPOSAL] stable master and 4.6 release

I just replied the other email about the VRs, where I actually mentioned the current mess that our github is due to the number of PRs and lack of proper reviews. So, +100 for that approach! If one cannot test a PR, so do not LGTM it! I would also add that a PR shall contain: 1. Jira ticket 2.

Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR

emented/tested for the basic zone VR. What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of components the code affects is not done. Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier. Thanks, Jayapal On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig.

Re: VPC router issue

tests executed against, but not the test_vpc_routers, and there it fails. So, the problem occurred between 788 and 805. Will keep digging. Cheers, Wilder On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:18, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi all, This morning I shared a message

Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR

y issues in production for some > time to come. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > >> On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >> I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2. >> >> Please, make sure the routers

Reverted PR 825

Guys, Unfortunately, PR 825 broke Master. Due to that, Remi and I just reverted it. @Boris: please fix the error and reopen the PR. Cheers, Wilder

Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR

I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2. Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same. Cheers, Wilder > On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > wrote: > > Assigned to myself. > > Thanks, > Jayapal >> On 15

VPC router issue

Hi all, This morning I shared a message on our Slack channel about the current issue I’m facing with VPC routers. The problem was caught by the test_vpc_routers.py tests, which are unable to verify the following: * Create a VPC with 2 Tiers, 3 VMs, 2Pub IPs, and 1 ACL * Stop the VPC router * St

Re: Update on ACS 4.6

good point! :) let me try again. Cheers, Wilder > On 10 Sep 2015, at 13:58, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > Did you login to ACS jira? Its visible only after login. > > ~Rajani > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>

Re: Update on ACS 4.6

Hi Remi, I went to the Dashboard but the message I got was: No matching issues found. I could not find the 6-8 blocker issues you mentioned. I would like to have a look at them and do some assessment on wh

Re: [Blocker/Critical] VR related Issues

Hi guys, CLOUDSTACK-8823 is a duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8814, created 2 days ago. Cheers, Wilder On 08 Sep 2015, at 13:35, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi guys, Thanks for reporting those issues. Concerni

Re: [Blocker/Critical] VR related Issues

Hi guys, Thanks for reporting those issues. Concerning the following issues… * Remote Access VPN https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/772 * Default INPUT/Forward policies https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/765 * Default route not configured on VPC https://github.com/apache/clou

Re: Remi Bergsma joins the PMC

Congratulations, dude! Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Aug 2015, at 19:09, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > LS, > > Today the PMC has invited Remi Bergsma to join its ranks. I am happy to say > that he accepted. Please join me in congratulating Remi. > > ​regards,​ > -- > Daan

Re: [Blocker] Default ip table rules on VR

HI, VPC routers (used by single and redundant VPCs) already fixed. Now testing shared/isolated routers. PR will be available in a few hours. Cheers, Wilder > On 03 Aug 2015, at 11:47, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Yep… that bit I know and it was already in the code. > &

Re: [Blocker] Default ip table rules on VR

st to ssh > to VR. > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sanjeev, >> >> I added some comments to the issue on Jira, but will share it here as well >> since not many people are watching

Re: [Blocker] Default ip table rules on VR

w iptables configuration with the old iptables-vpcrouter/iptables-router files. Cheers, Wilder > On 31 Jul 2015, at 06:03, Sanjeev N wrote: > > Thanks for working on it Wilder !! > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >

Re: [Blocker] Default ip table rules on VR

Hi, We discussed that one yesterday and I already assigned the issue to myself on Jira. I will fix it. Cheers, WIlder > On 30 Jul 2015, at 14:09, Sanjeev N wrote: > > Agree with Kishan Kavala and Jayapal. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Kishan Kavala > wrote: > >> This is a security

Re: [BLOCKER] unable to start VR in basic zone on master

Just replied to the previous email to the list. Sorry, I missed that one. I haven’t tested basic zone in a while… will give it a try. Cheers, Wilder > On 27 Jul 2015, at 14:51, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi there Rajani, > > My apologies, I missed that one. > >

Re: [BLOCKER] unable to start VR in basic zone on master

Hi there Rajani, My apologies, I missed that one. I haven’t tested basic zone in a while, to be honest. I will have a look to see if I can be of any help. Cheers, Wilder > On 27 Jul 2015, at 11:11, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > I faced the same issue with basic zone using xenserver on master.

[DISCUSS] Add at least test steps to PR

Hi all, Although we have been through those PR related discussions a lot, I would like to add just 1 point: * When a PR hasn't been properly tested before submitted or when the Committer hasn’t added any test report, that at least the test steps are present in the PR description. If for every

Re: [MASTER] ID RSA pub too open and asking passprrase

After 3 days we managed to find the problem. It has been fixed and pushed towards master. KVM is back on business! Details here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612 Cheers, Wilder On 20 Jul 2015, at 15:51, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi Wido

Re: [MASTER] ID RSA pub too open and asking passprrase

r On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Could you please ask him, Wido? I will look into it again tomorrow and get it fixed! Thanks for the reply! Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone On 17 Jul 2015, at 15:19, Wido den Hollander mailt

  1   2   3   4   >