I have CentOS 7.1 RPMs. In case anyone needs them now, I can make available.
Testing the 4.6.0 RC as I type. Cheers, Wilder > On 04 Nov 2015, at 18:12, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > > The jobs failed due to the git clone failing (time out). I also experience it > is quite slow at the moment. > > It is mirrored here (same commit id): > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > On 04/11/15 17:17, "Rajani Karuturi" <rajani.karut...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> I started jenkins builds for cloudstack RPM packages and systemvm templates >> for this branch here >> >> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter/19/console >> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized-sytemvm/3/console >> >> We can use them once the build is complete. >> >> ~Rajani >> >> On 04-Nov-2015, at 8:58 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Has jenkins built rpms for this somewhere? >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Remi Bergsma" <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 14:55:11 >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a >> vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 >> >> Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77 >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>
