Re: ACS Upgrade Failed :: Xenserver

> > > > root@cloudstack1:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list > > #deb http://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu bionic 4.15 > > deb http://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu bionic 4.16 > > deb http://download.c

Re: ACS Upgrade Failed :: Xenserver

> *The following packages have unmet dependencies: cloudstack-usage : > > Depends: cloudstack-common (= 4.17.0.0~focal) but 4.17.0.0~bionic is to > be > > installedE: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken > > packages.root@cloudstack1:~#* > >

Re: ACS Upgrade Failed :: Xenserver

Ranjit can you please try the upgrade again? There was an issue with the mirror for the usage package (4.17.0.0 bionic only). Should be good now (the mirror might still be syncing, but I bet it is already good to go). Regards, Gabriel. On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:15 AM Ranjit Jadhav wrote: > Hel

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17

Sounds good to me. Thanks for the update, Nicolas! Regards, Gabriel. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022, 10:59 Suresh Kumar Anaparti wrote: > Looks good Nicolas. > > Regards, > Suresh > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:29 PM Rohit Yadav > wrote: > > > > Sounds good to me, thanks for sharing Nicolas. > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] CentOS 7 KVM binaries

I don`t want to "pollute" the vote thread, as we should keep discussions on the proper thread (Discussion here [1]). However, we are already in such a situation. I hope that I can add some context and clarify a few things. @Daniel, please correct me if I misunderstood anything or my raised points

Re: [VOTE] CentOS 7 KVM binaries

The few times I used CentOS, or when implementing KVM local storage migration, I always had issues with "stock" CentOS qemu. I am definitely +1. On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 22:01 Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador < dvsalvador...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rohit, > > As we are deciding a requirement for deployi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote. On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov wrote: > Hi all, > > Voting +1 > > I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using > different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2, > 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

Hello folks, I would like to raise the issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6049. It affects not only 4.16.1.0 RC2, but also previous releases. I consider it a critical issue, which could potentially impact the need for a release candidate #3. Any thoughts? Regards, Gabriel. On Mon,

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.16.1

Sounds good! Thanks for volunteering, Suresh. Regards, Gabriel. On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:15 PM Suresh Anaparti < suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I propose the following timelines for 4.16.1.0 release, which is targeted > for Q1 2022. Please let me know if you have any feedb

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

iling > lists. > > -----Original Message- > From: Gabriel Bräscher > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 9:41 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04 > > Just adding to the "qemu-ev 2.10" & "qemu-ev

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

h den Absender und löschen Sie > die E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. > Vielen Dank. > > The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential > and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of > this e

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

, migrate should work from ubuntu 18.04 to ubuntu 20.04. But it is > not a bug if migration fails from ubuntu 20.04 to ubuntu 18.04. > > As Paul said, migration fails from qemu-ev 2.10 to qemu-ev 2.12, this is > definitely a bug in my point of view. > > -Wei > > On Mon, 6 De

Re: Live migration between AMD Epyc and Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04

Hi Paul (& all), I strongly believe that this is a bug in QEMU. I was looking for bugs and found something that looks related to what we are seeing. Precisely at Ubuntu's bug #*1887490* : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+b

Re: Docker images

Hi Marcus, I have never played with the Dockerfile you've mentioned. I need to double-check on it, but I would like to see CloudStack Docker images "officially" supported in order to deploy management nodes (especially for development and testing) and build packages. In terms of using Docker to b

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Based on tests on 4.16-SNAPSHOT packages and the RC1, RC2 Tested RC1/2: - build packages - manually seed System VM template - deploy VMs (system + user) - run couple of tests on VMs Em qui., 28 de out. de 2021 às 10:55, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador < dvsalvador...@gmail.com> esc

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2)

ld with unit tests passes. > > Regards. > ____ > From: Gabriel Bräscher > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 10:45:55 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2) > > I am still taking a spin on it. > > I would

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2)

, Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > +1 (binding) > > I also tried reproducing the building failure but could not hit it > building from branch 4.15.2.0-RC20210910T2119 > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > ______

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.2.0 (RC2)

I am still taking a spin on it. I would like to raise that when building the packages I've noticed some errors on tests that require ignoring them in order to build deb packages: [INFO] --- [INFO] T E S T S [INFO] ---

Re: [DISCUSS] hackathon at ccc

nd >>> wrote: >>> >>> > :D that is merged PL, please have at 5082 where I try to fix some >>> failing >>> > component tests. test frameworks and such is a good subject though! >>> > >>> > On Fri, Aug 27,

Re: [VOTE] Standard string lib

+1 On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 12:40 Sadi wrote: > +1 > > Good idea. > > On 13/09/2021 12:02, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using ( > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

working on the release. > > 3.1.2. Voting may take four flavors: > 3.1.2.1.+1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be performed." In > general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter > in "making it happen" >

Re: [Discussion] String libs

I do understand that a facade adds great value in many situations. However, I am afraid that this could escalate up to a point of us maintaining multiple facades of well-known libraries that in the end already offer us what we need. Such libraries tend to be stable; as an example, lang3 was launch

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

sts across three hypervisors - that is not to say no release has no > reported issues (in fact they all do 🙂). > > > Regards. > > > From: Gabriel Bräscher > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 18:39 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle > > Th

Re: [Discussion] Release Cycle

rt 3+ LTS simultaneously, which > doesn't make sense. Regular versions will give us some breath and will > reduce rework. > - Although the EOL is well defined, it seems we don't have a solid > criteria to define new versions, because they don't have a pattern. > Users

[Discussion] Release Cycle

Hello, I would like to open a discussion regarding the project release cycle. More specifically on the following topics: 1. LTS and Regular releases 2. Releases period 3. Enhance roadmap and Release cycle for users 1 LTS and Regular releases It has been a while since the last regular rel

Re: [DISCUSS] hackathon at ccc

+1 Sounds good to me. I would propose someone organizing the hackathon by raising the topics and adding at a Kanban during the Hackathon, then we can split into teams if there are too many tasks/attendees. The Kanban would be similar to what was done in the ApacheCon Montréal 2018 Hackathon [1,2].

Re: [DRAFT] [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0

+1 Looks good to me. Thanks, David! Em seg., 23 de ago. de 2021 às 08:53, Ivet Petrova < ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Hi David, > > I checked the links, all work correctly. The rest also looks good to me. > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > On 23 Aug 2021, at 14:37, David Jumani wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.15.2.0

Sounds good, Rohit. I'm +1 on a quick/stable 4.15.2. Em qui., 19 de ago. de 2021 às 07:54, Rohit Yadav escreveu: > All, > > I want to kick a thread to discuss and gather interest from the community > on doing a 4.15.2.0 release, before Nicolas (our RM) cuts 4.16.0.0 RC1 > around the end of Sept

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.16

+1 Good luck, Nicolas, Feel free to ping me if you need any help. Em qui., 24 de jun. de 2021 às 12:20, Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Yes Daan, that would be included on the timeline > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > De: Daan Hoog

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudMonkey v6.2.0

+1 Em sex., 9 de jul. de 2021 às 08:45, Rohit Yadav escreveu: > +1 > > It's been about a year since the last release, good to see the initiative > Pearl! > > Regards. > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > > > From: Pearl d'Silva > Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 10:51:44 AM >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Based on manual tests and validation of the issues raised in 4.15.1.0-RC1 & 4.15.1.0-RC2 which were addressed in RC3. Environment: - Apache CloudStack: Management server + DB (Ubuntu 18.04) - Zone Network: Advanced network + Security Groups - Hosts: KVM (Ubuntu 18.04) - Primary Stora

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)

I hate to bring bad news, but I found an issue caused by PR #5085 [1]. The issue affects only VM deployment via UI when using an offering that has root disk size. I've just opened PR #5150 [2]; tested it and this fixes the issue. Sorry for the inconvenience but this might require a third round. Wh

Re: Meet the CloudStack Community: Who is NEXT?

Hi Ivet & all I would suggest Pierre-Luc and/or Simon :-) They are PMCs that have been involved in the project for some time. It would be great if one of them (or both) could share a bit of their long-term experience with CloudStack. Cheers, Gabriel. Em sex., 18 de jun. de 2021 às 12:05, Ivet Pe

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider

I understand that OpenVPN is a great option and far adopted. I am ++1 in allowing Users/Admins to choose which VPN provider suits them best; creating an offering (or global settings) that would allow setting which VPN provider will be used would be awesome. I understand that OpenVPN is a great op

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC1)

4.15.1.0 RC1? > > If this is indeed a blocker issue, I'm happy to cut another RC next week > after the current RC's voting window. Meanwhile all PMCs, committers and > users may continue to test, vote RC1. Thanks. > > > Regards. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC1)

Hi Rohit, Thanks for bringing RC1. I am afraid that we will need an RC2. We are facing an issue that might be a blocker. I've just opened the issue here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5071 In a nutshell, we are not able to create a network when using VXLAN due to a validation added

Re: GSoC'21 - Clone a Virtual Machine

Hi Junxuan Wu, Congratulations! Welcome aboard :-) I am sure that the Mentors will do great work guiding you. But feel free to reach us in dev@ and GitHub issue/PRs anytime. Regards, Gabriel. Em qui., 20 de mai. de 2021 às 01:29, Pearl d'Silva < pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Hi Junxua

Re: GSoC'21 - UX enchancements

Hi Apurv, Congratulations! Welcome aboard :-) I am sure that the Mentors will do great work guiding you. But feel free to reach us in dev@ and GitHub issue/PRs anytime. Regards, Gabriel. Em qui., 20 de mai. de 2021 às 01:28, Pearl d'Silva < pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Hi Apurv, > >

Re: GSoC 2021 - Synchronization of network devices on newly added hosts for Persistent Networks

Hi Sangwoo, Congratulations! Welcome aboard :-) I am sure that the Mentors will do great work guiding you. Feel free to reach us in dev@ and GitHub issue/PRs anytime. Regards, Gabriel. Em qui., 20 de mai. de 2021 às 01:30, Pearl d'Silva < pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Hi Sangwoo, > >

Re: GSoC '21

Hi Bikram, Congratulations! Welcome aboard, enjoy the opportunity. I am sure that the Mentors will do great work guiding you. Regards, Gabriel. Em qui., 20 de mai. de 2021 às 01:32, Pearl d'Silva < pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Hi Bikram, > > Congratulations and welcome to the communi

Re: Meet the CloudStack Community - Sven Vogel

Awesome, good job Ivet and Sven. It is great to see that we are starting to consistently deliver new content and showing some faces to the whole community. Thanks for the hard work, Ivet. Regards, Gabriel. Em sex., 14 de mai. de 2021 às 07:51, Ivet Petrova < ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com> escreveu:

Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming default git branch name from 'master' to 'main'

Hi all, For the record, there have been some discussions on the [VOTE] thread ( https://markmail.org/thread/n6sbl3vgm7hy77zj) that have not been addressed here. Having such a discussion is way better than not having it. I would like to thank you all (both mail threads) for bringing points of view

Re: [VOTE] Renaming default git branch name from 'master' to 'main' and replace offensive words as appropriate for inclusiveness

+1 (binding) Em sex., 30 de abr. de 2021 às 08:51, Daan Hoogland escreveu: > +1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus > vote) > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti < > suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the discussi

Re: [VOTE] Renaming default git branch name from 'master' to 'main' and replace offensive words as appropriate for inclusiveness

+1 (binding) Em sex., 30 de abr. de 2021 às 08:51, Daan Hoogland escreveu: > +1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus > vote) > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti < > suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the discussi

Re: [GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] GabrielBrascher commented on pull request #204: Remove IRC reference as it is no longer used

@paul_a can you please add your feedback at the GitHub PR [1] as well? [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/204 Thanks Em sex., 2 de abr. de 2021 às 07:20, escreveu: > -1 on *steering* users, especially new ones to Slack. > > -- it requires signup/permission to a third p

Re: Congratulations to Gabriel - CloudStack PMC Chair

Many thanks to you all. I would also like to thank Sven for his engagement as 2020's VP. Best Regards, Gabriel. Em qui., 18 de mar. de 2021 às 08:45, Harikrishna Patnala < harikrishna.patn...@shapeblue.com> escreveu: > Congratulations Gabriel > > Best regards, > Harikrishna > ___

Re: Congratulations to Sven - Apache Software Foundation Member

Congrats Sven, keep the good work! Gabriel Em qua., 17 de mar. de 2021 às 18:16, Simon Weller escreveu: > Congrats Sven! > > From: Paul Angus > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:13 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; > us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: C

Re: Cloudstack developer training

Thanks for sharing this, Giles. It can definitely help newcomers. Gabriel On Sun, Mar 7, 2021, 10:05 Will Stevens wrote: > Nice work team. This is an awesome contribution to the community. > > Will > > On Fri., Feb. 26, 2021, 10:43 a.m. Giles Sirett, < > giles.sir...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC4]

+1 (binding) * Environment: - Apache CloudStack: Management server + DB (Ubuntu 18.04) - Hosts: KVM (Ubuntu 18.04) - Primary Storage: NFS, RBD, KVM Local - Secondary Storage: NFS - Zone Network: Advanced network + Security Groups - Tests were performed on both Primate UI and legacy UI * RC4 tests

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

+1 (binding) I could not find any blocker issue neither on CloudStack nor CloudStack-primate. Details: 1. Environment: - Apache CloudStack: Management server + DB (Ubuntu 18.04) - Hosts: KVM (Ubuntu 18.04) - Primary Storage: NFS, RBD, KVM Local- Secondary Storage: NFS - Zone Network: Advanced net

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC2]

+1 (binding) Environment: - Apache CloudStack: Management server + DB (Ubuntu 18.04) - Hosts: KVM (Ubuntu 18.04) - Primary Storage: NFS, RBD, KVM Local- Secondary Storage: NFS - Zone Network: Advanced network + Security Groups - Tests were performed on both Primate UI and legacy UI -- Tests - Bui

Re: [DISCUSS] [IMPORTANT] CloudStack 4.14 release WITH updated UI

Thanks for bringing this discussion, Rohit. I have no objections to proceeding with the VOTE. But I would like to bring a small consern. I see benefits in combining both projects into one; however, I also find it quite interesting to provide some "autonomy" to the UI project. At least in terms of

Re: [DISCUSS][RELEASE] 4.15 merges and milestone

That's awesome! Things are looking good for a RC1. Do we have any due time for it? Em qui., 3 de dez. de 2020 às 11:14, Daan Hoogland escreveu: > Hello again, > > I have just merged the last critical item for 4.14 and 4.15. All other PRs > are (or should be) moved to future milestones. > I think