+1 (binding)

I could not find any blocker issue neither on CloudStack nor
CloudStack-primate.

Details:
1. Environment:
- Apache CloudStack: Management server + DB (Ubuntu 18.04)
- Hosts: KVM (Ubuntu 18.04)
- Primary Storage: NFS, RBD, KVM Local- Secondary Storage: NFS
- Zone Network: Advanced network + Security Groups
- Tests were performed on both Primate UI and legacy UI

2. Tests:
- Build 4.15.0.0 from source
- Upgrade from 4.13.1.0 to 4.15.0.0
- Deploy SystemVMs
- create user VMs on different primary storages (local, NFS, RBD)
- Live Migrate VMs (tested with local, NFS, and RBD)
- Put host in maintenance
- Remove/add host
- Add/remove primary storage (local and NFS)
- Add secondary storage (NFS)
- Deploy new Zone
- Register template
- Configure Service Offerings
- Change VM's offering
- Enable OOBM (Redfish)
- Perform OOBM actions (Redfish)

Em qui., 31 de dez. de 2020 às 06:03, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
escreveu:

> +1 (binding)
>
> I ran smoketests with the following combination (fresh installation only)
> and all tests passed except for one case on KVM (see below), few cases
> known to fail intermittently were checked and ignored (test_01_scale_vm,
> test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes which passed in other environments):
>
> CentOS7 mgmt server + vmware-65u2 + adv zone
> CentOS7 mgmt server + kvm-centos7 + adv zone
> CentOS7 mgmt server + xenserver-71 + adv zone
>
> On the KVM CentOS7 env this failed:
> test_03_deploy_and_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster | `Failure` | 240.74 |
> test_kubernetes_clusters.py
>
> On manual investigation, the above turned out to be an intermittent issue
> (passed on manual attempt and already passed in other env). I've also
> manually tested the following:
> - Basic VM lifecycle tests using default built-in CentOS template on an
> isolated network
> - CKS cluster setup with v1.16.0 with CoreOS template, also tested upgrade
> CKS cluster to v1.16.3
> - Several basic views of the modern UI, and legacy UI on the
> <host:8080>/client/legacy to check basic VM lifecycle views and actions
> - The new novnc console both over unsecured and SSL-enabled environments
>
>
> Proposed a minor document change based on testing Kubernetes/CKS cluster:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/174/files
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 23:13
> To: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> LS,
> After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other than
> bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
> vmware.
>
> We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
>
> The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
> separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming releases,
> at least from a version management point of view.
> I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:Git Branches:
> main code:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> >
> ui code:
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> >
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> and Commit SH:
> main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev. 45059)
> PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
> open
> for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members
> please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
> the next few days.
> The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to