Github user milamberspace commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#discussion_r44112143
--- Diff: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfigServer.py ---
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ def checkHostName():
bash("chown cloud.cloud /var/run/cl
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/801#issuecomment-154335646
ok so bottom line, it seems reviews are +1 and we will merge this in 4.7.
ASAP after 4.6.0 is out, taking.
the only thing will be to keep an eye on it and
When I test last time remote access vpn and s2s vpn are working.
I think there are no changes done on vpn after that.
@Nux
If you still see problem observe /var/log/auth.log in the VR.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On 06-Nov-2015, at 5:22 am, Nux! wrote:
>
> Remi,
>
> This was a normal server-client VPN,
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154239490
@ustcweizhou We can! Though in the current structure, if we change to
support Tomcat7 we can't support Tomcat6... In my opinion, we leave it to
Tomcat6 for the 4
Remi,
This was a normal server-client VPN, not site2site. The client is Win7, but the
network was a bit dodgy there, hence my doubts the VPN was actually broken. :)
Lucian
PS: script welcome for possible future uses, thanks!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154233552
cannot we fix the issue in tomcat7 suppport ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/801#issuecomment-154200225
:+1: LGTM
@nlivens excellent work -- much appreciate the hard work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Hi Lucian,
As far as I know it works. The Marvin tests also passes.
When I test manual and connect two VPCs together, I can ping the hosts on each
side. I can send you a small script that sets it up, if you want.
Regards,
Remi
On 05/11/15 19:47, "Nux!" wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>I am testing 4.6
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154161203
LGTM
We can deal with other Tomcat versions later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040
CLOUDSTACK-9040: Use Tomcat6 for Debian packages.
Use Tomcat6 for Debian packages.
How to test:
Package debian packages and install them. Will depend specifically on
tomcat6 for
Installation on CentOS 6 mgmt and HVs worked great, added some templates,
deployed some instances, no issues.
I'll get back if I hit problems.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.
Hi,
I don't know if it's something in my environment, but I am running a basic
zone with one pod and one XenServer 6.5 cluster and my VMs don't seem to
get IP addresses from the range I specified.
The VM's hostname is not set properly nor does it produce the correct IP
address when I run ifconfig
Hi guys,
I am testing 4.6 briefly and basic operations work. I am also trying now VPN
functionality on a SNAT public IP, however I don't seem to get it working.
Can someone confirm it works for them so I know it's me (as always)? I am not
usually using this feature, but thought to try it anyway.
Great work Rohit,
What I'd like to see:
- vCPU list/count for instance metrics (GHz is meaningless to me)
- can we make the whole thing wider so we can fit more columns there without
that ugly horizontal scroll bar? So much wasted screen space
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technolog
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039
CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ubuntu Management
Fix paths for logging Ubuntu Management.
How to test:
Install via DEB packages...
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1034#discussion_r44015311
--- Diff: ui/scripts/vpc.js ---
@@ -4184,7 +4184,7 @@
// Get VPN gateways
$.ajax({
-
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154067974
For screenshots, please see the FS:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Metrics+Views+for+CloudStack+UI
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Hi all,
The present CloudStack UI hides most of the metrics data such as cpu, memory,
disk, network usage in inner detail views. Such information is critical to find
issues in one’s cloud, for example finding clusters where hosts are failing, or
finding storage pools where disk space has deplet
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038
Metrics views for CloudStack UI
FS:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Metrics+Views+for+CloudStack+UI
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9020
You
Hi Team,
We have scheduled daily volume snapshots in ACS 4.3.1 and XenServer 6.2 SP1 as
Hypervisor. In secondary storage, we are getting full backups every day
instead of incremental backups.
After restarting management service and SQL service, we found that the next
backup was incremental a
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154062799
I am not fine with this change but must be honest and report regressions
tests from the bubble: they all passed.
```
Test router internal advanced
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1018#issuecomment-154050616
@runseb because this is to old you get a 404. My guess about the failure is
that it ran on any of the machines mentioned in INFRA-10703. these have regular
SEG
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/999#issuecomment-154050476
+1 LGTM , does not touch core, totally independent code, only affects the
behavior of built docker images.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1018#issuecomment-154050065
simple enough, but why is Jenkins failing, the link even goes 404.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1034#issuecomment-154048544
+1 LGTM, just looked at the code, did not check the actual UI rendering.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Hi Daan,
Thanks for getting back to me. I just had chance to try this again today
and it appeared to go through fine. Very strange!
Cheers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> hey some guy,
>
> Our jenkins apidoc builders have been failing regularly in such a way
> coming bac
Github user atrbgithub commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/925#issuecomment-154042688
Fix for master branch has been proposed here
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1037
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user atrbgithub opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1037
Fix for CLOUDSTACK-8937 - XenServer migrations with storage failing iâ¦
â¦n clustered management server environment
This pull request relates to the following Jira bug report:
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1036#issuecomment-154035977
Thanks @rags22489664 sounds good! Will try to test it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154035894
@DaanHoogland If you look at ApiResponseGsonHelper.java in this PR there
are GSon builders
private static final GsonBuilder s_gBuilder;
private s
GitHub user rags22489664 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1036
CLOUDSTACK-9038 - Infrastructure tab is slow because of synchronous API
calls
Making parallel asynchronous calls to speed up the infrastructure page.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154032129
@koushik-das you said 'LogLevel is used in the latter one only.'. That is
not true, I think. see com.cloud.agent.transport.RequestTest
---
If your project is
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154030678
@DaanHoogland That's right. I had already mentioned about the agent
commands in one of my previous comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154027199
@koushik-das I don't think you are right, command serialisation uses
LogLevel as well. Look at com.cloud.agent.transport.RequestTest and tell me if
you agree.
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#issuecomment-154025365
@DaanHoogland About the issue you pointed out in com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart
serialization. Nice find but these are already existing issues. They surely
needs fixi
Hi all,
I have been busy testing the 4.6.0 RC since last night. The results below are
still partial (I still have to test XenServer 6.5), but it looks very promising!
My vote will be given once I’m done with Xen65 and upgrade tests.
Cheers,
Wilder
:: Environment 1 ::
* Hardware required: TRUE
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r43997043
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseGsonHelper.java ---
@@ -71,4 +83,19 @@ public boolean shouldSkipField(FieldAttributes f) {
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r43996820
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseGsonHelper.java ---
@@ -27,30 +29,40 @@
import com.google.gson.GsonBuilder;
/**
- *
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r43996309
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/UserVmResponse.java ---
@@ -256,6 +259,7 @@
@SerializedName(ApiConstants.SSH_KEYPA
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1035#issuecomment-154019836
tested. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r43996196
--- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SslCertResponse.java
---
@@ -38,6 +40,7 @@
@SerializedName(ApiConstants.CERTIFICA
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r43996031
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java ---
@@ -40,6 +42,7 @@
@SerializedName("fingerprint")
Hi all!
I've made the DEB packages of the 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 publicly available here:
https://cloudstack.o.auroraobjects.eu/precise/cloudstack-agent_4.6.0_all.deb
https://cloudstack.o.auroraobjects.eu/precise/cloudstack-cli_4.6.0_all.deb
https://cloudstack.o.auroraobjects.eu/precise/cloudstack
Cool that you went the extra mile with the manual test. :)
Once fixed, I will also write a test to cover the scenario you described in the
issue. It will make it future proof.
Thanks again, Bharat!
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 05 Nov 2015, at 10:54, Bharat Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Wilder has already
Hi,
Wilder has already reduced the priority to critical, I found it while manually
testing some of my changes.
I am not aware of a test which checks this.
—Bharat.
On 05-Nov-2015, at 3:03 pm, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi Bharat,
>
> First of all: thanks for reporting the issue!
>
> Would it be
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1035
CLOUDSTACK-9037 patterns can be more elaborate then prefixes.
little fix to make sure for instance "eth" is not regarded as interface
when it is part of "methamfetamine"
You can merge thi
Hi Bharat,
First of all: thanks for reporting the issue!
Would it be possible to write a Marvin test for it, so we can test this
automatically and prevent regression? Or did you find this by an existing
Marvin test that I missed?
Please downgrade to critical. We should fix this, and we will, b
Hi Wilder,
If we think that it is ok to have the work around for now fix this later, we
can bring the priority down to critical.
Thanks,
Bharat.
On 05-Nov-2015, at 2:49 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi Bharat,
>
> Please check if what you just mention will work. If it does, then the issue
The 4.6.0 tag is now removed.
To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
- [deleted] 4.6.0
Didn’t take it like that, René, you had a valid point. No problem.
Regards, Remi
On 05/11/15 09:55, "Rene Moser" wrote:
>Hi
>
>On 11/05/2015 09:52 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>
Hi Bharat,
Please check if what you just mention will work. If it does, then the issue is
not a blocker.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 05 Nov 2015, at 10:09, Bharat Kumar wrote:
>
> I have’t checked, but form the code it looks like it will work if we reissue
> the reset command after the slave become
I have’t checked, but form the code it looks like it will work if we reissue
the reset command after the slave becomes master.
—Bharat.
On 05-Nov-2015, at 12:59 pm, Erik Weber
mailto:terbol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Bharat Kumar
mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com>>
wro
Hi
On 11/05/2015 09:52 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before it
> is final. Sorry!
Ok then! Was not meant to be a criticism at all, Remi, Don't get me
wrong. Would be good to me to remove it.
Yours
René
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Remi Bergsma
> wrote:
>
>> I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before
>> it is final. Sorry!
>>
>> Let's see if we can get rid of it until the vote passes.
>>
>> Regards, Remi
I don't like the rc1 tag. The date tag is more descriptive. and easier to
automate. As for the tag being or not in git doesn't really matter. I used
to rename the released branch to GA-4.4.x after the vote and leave the tag
on there as well. In the end it is the commit-id that is significnant.
On
Guys,
I accidentally pushed the 4.6.0 tag and I shouldn't have done that before it is
final. Sorry!
Let's see if we can get rid of it until the vote passes.
Regards, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
> On 05 Nov 2015, at 09:35, Rene Moser wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tag
Good point! Hadn't looked there. I don't think we should tag an RC as it's still
under active development.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Boris Schrijver
PCextreme B.V.
http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact
Tel direct: +31 6 33784542
> On November 5, 2015 at 9:47 AM Rene Moser wrote:
>
I don't see a tag either. When the RC passes its vote, then a tag and
corresponding release will be created. Until then, we just have the rc branch.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Boris Schrijver
PCextreme B.V.
http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact
Tel direct: +31 6 33784542
> On Novemb
Thanks Remi!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Remi Bergsma"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 20:45:59
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0
> Kicked off some Jenkins builds:
>
On 11/05/2015 09:45 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
I am not seeing it on github yet, but on here
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tags
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
>
> We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
>
>
Unless I'm seeing wrong, we have a branch, and it's called
'4.6.0-RC20151104T1522'
htt
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1034
Fix some small UI bugs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ustcweizhou/cloudstack ui-changes
Alternatively you can review
+1 with 4.6.0-rc1
2015-11-05 9:34 GMT+01:00 Rene Moser :
> Hi
>
> I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
>
> We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
>
> 1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
> anyo
Hi
I have kind of a question about the tagging policy in cloudstack git repo:
We now have tag 4.6.0 but we call it an RC. This raises 2 problems:
1st: from the public perspective, this is a released version. Or how can
anyone not related to the project see, if this is an RC or not?
2nd: tags se
63 matches
Mail list logo
