Re: Review Request 22511: Allow use of simulator hypervisor from client gui

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:19 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Looks like a handy feature, Leo can you send a new patch or have a > > discussion if we should have it? As Prasanna notes, this is not needed in > > production. Hey Rohit thanks for checking in. It looks like I commented way back when, but

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #88

See

Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi Star, Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1. how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for xenserver host? waiting for your reply. Regards, Rajasekhar. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo wrote: > > Hi, > > There is a priority: t

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 9 dec. 2014 05:43 schreef "Rajani Karuturi" : > > This looks like recurring problem we are going to face again in the future > version. Especially given that its so deep in a java file, its very easy to > slip it for a relea

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user rajesh-battala commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-66244114 Its in private permission. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Krunal Jain wrote: > Hi Leo. > > Could you please share > https://w

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

Hi Marcus, static NAT (outound connections) works fine - when internal VM access internet, it's source address is replaced with the MAIN public IP of the VPC VR (call it IP1 in my example - x.x.x.x) - so all fine. Then I have additional public IPs to be able to do port forwarding... - when I do po

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

I will help you resolve the conflicts. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Koushik Das wrote: I tried a merge just now and it failed for tools/appliance/build.sh On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:23 AM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > Sounds good - thanks > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi > wr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user krunal10 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-66243468 Hi Leo. Could you please share https://www.slideshare.net/LeoSimons1/toolkit-posterccceu14-v2 with me. Thanks! Regards, Krunal Jain (Sung

Review Request 28840: CLOUDSTACK-8049: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28840/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

I tried a merge just now and it failed for tools/appliance/build.sh On 09-Dec-2014, at 11:23 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Sounds good - thanks > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > >> yes >> >> ~Rajani >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski < >> mike.

答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi, There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the network rate of global configuration. If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and focus on ... . Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 发送时

unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi all, i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200 Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate. please suggest me

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

Github user sudhansu7 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66239667 Thanks Rajani. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

Github user sudhansu7 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

Sounds good - thanks On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > yes > > ~Rajani > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and > then > > do an empty merge to

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

yes ~Rajani On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and then > do an empty merge to master? Is that correct? > > Thanks > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Rajani Karuturi > wrote

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

I guess I would expect the non-zero blocks of your disk to be backed up the first time, which could lead to anywhere from some small amount of space all the way up to 8 GB (in your situation). However, you mentioned that you see 9 GB consumed, which does seem unexpected. When you say your templat

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

Thanks Mike! However, I am observing this in case of first snapshot also. Let me try on various hypervisors to see the behavior. Regards, Gaurav On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and then do an empty merge to master? Is that correct? Thanks On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of > it and will not come back in the

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of it and will not come back in the next merges. ~Rajani On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and > i

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are using XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume, each subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the prior snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with CloudStack). That bein

Review Request 28836: CLOUDSTACK-8048: Fix test_ss_limits.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

[QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

Hello, When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an account, then 1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size) 2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the account? Currently I can see s

Re: [Question] System VM

Thanks, Nitin! On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec. > storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate > the new iso which will contain your code change. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and it is not supposed to go into master? Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > 4.5 is merged to master as of > commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec893

Re: [Question] System VM

I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec. storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate the new iso which will contain your code change. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SystemVm.iso#SystemV m.iso-VMWare Thanks, -

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

This looks like recurring problem we are going to face again in the future version. Especially given that its so deep in a java file, its very easy to slip it for a release. Can we use the max version of a 'completed' step from the version table? Or make this configurable and update it in the docs

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

4.5 is merged to master as of commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7 I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved. ~Rajani On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the pull > re

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #87

See

Re: [Question] System VM

Thanks, Sateesh! On Monday, December 8, 2014, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > ] > > Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [Question

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #758

See

RE: [Question] System VM

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [Question] System VM > > Hi, > > I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to primary > storage from second

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #86

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #757

See

[Question] System VM

Hi, I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to primary storage from secondary storage. This code - related to ESXi - gets run in the SSVM. Is it sufficient if I rebuild the codebase using the systemvm profile, destroy my SSVM, and allow a new one to be created? Does thi

Re: [DISCUSS] Issues with Ubuntu instance creation

> On Dec 8, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Tim Mackey wrote: > > I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS > templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues, > but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the > right thing.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #85

See

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

Or wait, you're not using static NAT, you're just using port forwarding, correct? Everything will be NAT'ed outbound to the VPC router's public IP per SNAT, like one would expect behind a NAT. You could force outbound to match the IP that the port forwarder is on, but what if you have multiple IPs

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes unnoticed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > And just

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

Hi Erik - yes I know of shared network - been using that, but want to move behind VPC to organize stuff a little bit more... ok, for loadbalancing - did not check, as that is not my problem at the moment. But port forwarding really is - this is really bad implemenation or bug in my opinion, never

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to > come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. > So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port > forwading) because all connections appear to come from m

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi, > > when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access > web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access > logs as remote IP. > > Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? > My under

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. This is terrible design/bug - can

Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other rea

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 7 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 8 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #756

See

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

FYI During my regression testing of 4.5, I noticed a storage-related issue with regards to VMware. I had to correct it in be38b9706615d5ab0cc9959577b0fff9a36a9fc6. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is >

Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #84

See

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

It is still doing the same, I suspect that this is an intentional behavior of qemu, it keeps the disk space for future use. However I haven't found any documentation on how users should free the space. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > As far as I know, KVM does support memory

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:50 AM, lsimons wrote: > Github user lsimons commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65199170 > > Hey folks, > > Karl thanks for contributing. Looks like quite a bit of work! > > Rohit thanks for CC-ing m

[CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds CVSS: 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Afffected: Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4 Description: Apache CloudStack may be configured

Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-singlerun #755

See

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

Heya, Restarted Jenkins after cleaning up some space. Hopefully this will keep Jenkins running for a couple of days. When i have some more time i’ll try and think of a more permanent solution. @David, would it be possible to add an extra disk to this box? A 100Gb disk would go a long way. C

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: make the VPN feature work more reliable a...

GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/54 make the VPN feature work more reliable and secure At Schuberg Philis we wanted to use the VPN feature, but found it hard to make it work in a reliable way. When we dove into it, we found som

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #211

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #671

See

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

Also raised the issue a few days ago. Hugo seemed awfully busy. Erik Den mandag 8. desember 2014 skrev Rohit Yadav følgende: > > > On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > >> Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? >> >> We have not had a successfu

Re: [ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage

I think you need to take VOLUME snapshots for them to be stored on the SS. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "benoit lair" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 8 December, 2014 16:57:34 > Subject: [ACS

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the workload. Is this an expecte

[ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage

Hello Folks, My environment is ACS 4.3.0 with xenservers 6.2.0 When taking snapshots, there are stocked in the primary storage (supposing calling native xenservers apis). In my remembers i have already seen (with xenservers) snapshots stocked on secondary storage. How can i achieve this ? My

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:55 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on > > master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch. > > Axel Delahaye wrote: > I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent Send

jenkins.buildacloud.org

Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the workload. Is this an expected outage? Cheers, *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps*

[DISCUSS] Issues with Ubuntu instance creation

I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues, but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the right thing. Here's my list of issues, and what I did to get past my "issue"

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:55 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on > > master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch. I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent - Axel ---

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

> On déc. 5, 2014, 9:43 après-midi, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Does the feature include the capability to update or change userdata once > > the VM is created? No, it is an optional textarea in the instanceWizard - Axel --- This is an

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is working correctly. Lots of things in the queue though, so it may take a while. ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* t

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

merged On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting > on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the > reader;) > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: >> I am not hosting a public

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

Fair enough. :) Just merge the branch this time and we will figure out the details going forward. I think reducing the work for the person doing the merge will help collaboration (even if the committer has to do a bit more work), so I am open to how we do this... ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Develo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Ovmsupport

Github user snuf commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-66134697 Hi Rohit, Well there are a couple of things here: 1st: I work on a fork and pull in upstream master and merge that into ovmsupport (https://github.com/snu

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the reader;) On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the > simplest way. A pull requ

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices for the > community to adopt! > > On Fri

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the simplest way. A pull request is great for non-committers to contribute, but I think it is a bit disjointed for committers who already have access to create fix branches. Do you agree? ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudO

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

lgtm, do i look for a pull request, or just merge? On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the > system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a > compatibility issues. > > This merge

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

I just checked it. That is because Leo Simons made the changes for CLOUDSTACK-7143. Nice! 2014-12-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland : > Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit > dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been > spending enough time in th

Re: 答复: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

Yeah, that's what I meant by "not straighforward". :-) I'll stick with my libvirt/KVM setups for now. Cheers Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Star Guo" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 8 Decembe

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been spending enough time in the newer branches lately:( On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Daan, > > system64template dir does not exist in master branch.

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

Daan, system64template dir does not exist in master branch. It is strange. I saw many commits on systemvmtemplate, but not on system64template. Maybe we need to fix it. -Wei 2014-12-08 15:32 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland : > Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the systemvm64template dir mostly. I > think

答复: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

I think if all the cloudstack network is behind a firewall ( a device setting DNAT+SNAT ) it may be easy to achieve the goal of DR. Make all CS management (mysql) as a KVM instance which start with virsh, and backend btrfs, and make primary storage and secondary storage backend of other subvolu

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a compatibility issues. This merge should be made asap... Cheers, *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

few question about 4.5; - which systemvm should we use? jenkins job build-systemvm-4.5 is a month old. - upgrade path seams damaged, previous bug CLOUDSTACK-8041 is false, although I've never succeed to upgrade a system so far. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > The up

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

I see some changes that make me want to put 4.5.0 in there for the 4.5 branch. proceding On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade > procedure if it is not needed. > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wr

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade procedure if it is not needed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it > must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in > MinVRVersio

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in MinVRVersion in 4.4! On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such as ACS > 4.4.x, this val

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the systemvm64template dir mostly. I think the 32bit one is no longer supported, really. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM, wrote: > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master f73ad2e8b -> ca5c800f8 > > > Fix CloudStack version (4.6.0) in systemv

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such as ACS 4.4.x, this value should be 4.4.0 unless we want to use higher templates such as 4.4.1 or 4.4.2. For 4.5, it should be 4.5.0. This is assuming that ACS templates are compatible with future bugfix releases and we don't

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

I am looking if the value 4.4.1 is applicable there or whether it should be higher, as we mail. will update you all. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess? > > -- > Erik > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland > wr

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess? -- Erik On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out > that in the update procedure the flag > VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for ver

[ACS44] router upgrade issue

H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out that in the update procedure the flag VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for versions 4.4.0-4.4.2 I have no workaround other then rebooting the routers instead of upgading/updating them. I will patch the branch

Re: [ACS45] release notes

Hi Daan, Yes, 1.7 java upgrade is from the RN of 4.4, I'll remove 4.5 RN from RTD since it's not completed yet. Sorry about that. PL On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Pierre-Luc, > > I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is java > 1.7 as well. > >

Re: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

Thanks, but that is not my main problem. My difficulties are more like: - how do I dump metadata for cloudstack KVM guests that are not running? virsh dumpxml will not work as the guests that are not running are not defined at all in libvirt (ie this will not list them: virsh list --all) - how

答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

Hi, I think if you make nfs as primary storage backend on brtfs or zfs (freenas?) you could take a snapshot and send all to DR site. Also, a plan of increment snapshot. This may be good method. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 发送时间: 2014年12月8日 20:34 收件人

Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

Hi, I'm getting more and more requests from customers to have "mini clouds" installed, but also DR capability. This would be a great occasion to introduce them to Cloudstack, except for the DR bit for which I have found no straightforward way of performing. I'd have to replicate a whole lot of

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Andrija, No, 6.2 went fully free, no more restrictions. You can do disk and/or memory snapshots as much as you want, ACS supports it. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Andrija Panic" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Not that I know. I take VM snaphots all the time, and don't have XS licenses. -- Erik On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless > you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ? > > On 8 Decem

[proposal] Purge Volumes instead of deleting them

Anybody interested ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Best -- Andrija Panić

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ? On 8 December 2014 at 12:43, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk < > vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee > > wrote: > > > CS does not s

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are > working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I > thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not > support memory sna

[ACS45] release notes

Pierre-Luc, I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is java 1.7 as well. -- Daan

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

As far as I know, KVM does support memory snapshot. The shortcoming is libvirt-java supports only internal snapshot (not external snapshots) for now. In this case, the memory snapshot will be attached to the qcow2 file, and the qcow2 will grow even after we remove the memory snapshot. I've changed

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66104188 missed adding a link to the pr in commit message 4.3: 7d17e95991035beeb802483a4b3d98df0dc9c8e8 4.4: c8882b39ec6ba84355a70c2f59f01a422e906b31 4.5 and master:

  1   2   >