mobile dev with bilingual spelling checker used (read at your own risk) Op 9 dec. 2014 05:43 schreef "Rajani Karuturi" <raj...@apache.org>: > > This looks like recurring problem we are going to face again in the future > version. Especially given that its so deep in a java file, its very easy to > slip it for a release. > > Can we use the max version of a 'completed' step from the version table? No, it might be lower.
> Or make this configurable and update it in the docs to use the latest > template version? Configurable sound allright but the config action must be the same as the sysvm install action or we are shifting our responsibilty to the user. > > ~Rajani > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I see some changes that make me want to put 4.5.0 in there for the 4.5 > > branch. proceding > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade > > > procedure if it is not needed. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > >> Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it > > >> must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in > > >> MinVRVersion in 4.4! > > >> > > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rohit Yadav < rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > >>> In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such > > as ACS > > >>> 4.4.x, this value should be 4.4.0 unless we want to use higher > > templates > > >>> such as 4.4.1 or 4.4.2. > > >>> For 4.5, it should be 4.5.0. This is assuming that ACS templates are > > >>> compatible with future bugfix releases and we don't want to enforce > > >>> templates upgrades unless necessary. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Monday 08 December 2014 07:55 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I am looking if the value 4.4.1 is applicable there or whether it > > >>>> should be higher, as we mail. will update you all. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>> > This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess? > > >>>> > > > >>>> > -- > > >>>> > Erik > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland < > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > >>>> > wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> >> H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out > > >>>> >> that in the update procedure the flag > > >>>> >> VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for versions > > >>>> >> 4.4.0-4.4.2 > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> I have no workaround other then rebooting the routers instead of > > >>>> >> upgading/updating them. I will patch the branch to contain the > > correct > > >>>> >> minimal version. The higher version branches have this var still > > set > > >>>> >> to 4.3.0 as well. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> -- > > >>>> >> Daan > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Rohit Yadav > > >>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue > > >>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > >>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > > >>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) > > >>> > > >>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > > services > > >>> > > >>> IaaS Cloud Design & > > >>> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > > >>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework< > > http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > > >>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > > >>> CloudStack Software > > >>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > > >>> CloudStack Infrastructure > > >>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > > >>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training > > >>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > >>> > > >>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > > intended > > >>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any > > views or > > >>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > > necessarily > > >>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not > > the > > >>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action > > based > > >>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the > > sender > > >>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd > > is a > > >>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP > > is a > > >>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape > > Blue > > >>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in > > Brasil > > >>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty > > Ltd is a > > >>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under > > >>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Daan > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > >
