Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is working correctly. Lots of things in the queue though, so it may take a while.
ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > merged > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting > > on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the > > reader;) > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > >> I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the > >> simplest way. A pull request is great for non-committers to contribute, > >> but I think it is a bit disjointed for committers who already have > access > >> to create fix branches. Do you agree? > >> > >> ws > >> > >> > >> *Will STEVENS* > >> Lead Developer > >> > >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> lgtm, > >>> > >>> do i look for a pull request, or just merge? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to > get > >>> the > >>> > system vms building again. The building is currently broken because > of a > >>> > compatibility issues. > >>> > > >>> > This merge should be made asap... > >>> > > >>> > Cheers, > >>> > > >>> > *Will STEVENS* > >>> > Lead Developer > >>> > > >>> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > >>> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > >>> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> few question about 4.5; > >>> >> > >>> >> - which systemvm should we use? jenkins job build-systemvm-4.5 is a > >>> month > >>> >> old. > >>> >> - upgrade path seams damaged, previous bug CLOUDSTACK-8041 is > >>> >> false, although I've never succeed to upgrade a system so far. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion < > pd...@cloudops.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > The upgrade path require a systemvm-template otherwise the > database > >>> >> > upgrade fail, I've create this one: CLOUDSTACK-8041 > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Could it be possible to just look for the latest template to exist > >>> during > >>> >> > a db upgrade? with the current check, to upgrade from 4.2.1 > require to > >>> >> have > >>> >> > the systemvm-template of 4.3,4.4 and 4.5 of all hypervisors in > order > >>> to > >>> >> > successfully upgrade the database. is this something easy to fix? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:53 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> Hi All, > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following > artifacts > >>> >> >> up for review: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20141206T0129 > >>> >> >> Commit: fcfc3060ff5a7aa2c57548ded90298c0920921fd > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the > same > >>> >> >> location): > >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc0/ > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> PGP release keys (signed using A15F30B9): > >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Because this is an early RC, I am not going to yet call a vote > on it, > >>> >> >> but rather going to let it set and let folks see if it's tenable. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> PLEASE test, and leave feedback in this thread. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> --David > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daan > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > > -- > Daan >
