if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of it and will not come back in the next merges.
~Rajani On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and > it is not supposed to go into master? > > Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired. > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > 4.5 is merged to master as of > > commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7 > > > > I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved. > > > > ~Rajani > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the > pull > > > requests and hence abandoned the merge. Now that travis is green, I > > > planning to put up another pull request. > > > > > > let me know if you see any issues. > > > > > > ~Rajani > > > > > > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >