if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of
it and will not come back in the next merges.


~Rajani

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and
> it is not supposed to go into master?
>
> Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > 4.5 is merged to master as of
> > commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7
> >
> > I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the
> pull
> > > requests and hence abandoned the merge. Now that travis is green, I
> > > planning to put up another pull request.
> > >
> > > let me know if you see any issues.
> > >
> > > ~Rajani
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>

Reply via email to