Anyone else see these errors in Eclipse?

"display cannot be resolved to a variable" http://i.imgur.com/Jz2swFS.png -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud *(tm)*

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

It is already in 4.4 as well. Kelven On 3/14/14, 3:58 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >That is, I'll pull the current 4.4 into my branch and test before I merge >it in > > >On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it >> has been c

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:15 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 14.03.2014 21:57, Edison Su wrote: > > Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852e50ebd99d4a72fd51d1753b05eb

IAM guidelines for CS APIs

Hi there, With the introduction of the IAM feature, there are some new annotations/mechanisms to implement access control at CS API and Service layer. Min and I have documented guidelines to follow while adding APIs to CloudStack: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 21:57, Edison Su wrote: Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852e50ebd99d4a72fd51d1753b05eb on 4.3-forward branch. I do see the rule coming on the kvm host: -A FORWARD -o cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0 -A FORWARD -i cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

That is, I'll pull the current 4.4 into my branch and test before I merge it in On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Marcus wrote: > Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it > has been cut already. > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: >> Marcus, >>

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it has been cut already. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Marcus, > > I¹ve pushed the fix to master already. You probably need to sync your > local branch with master > > Kelven > > On 3/14/14, 11:08 AM, "Mar

Re: review request hook for git

anybody gave it apin? just put it in your local .git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg and it should do its job. It's job is to do nothing if you don't add or update any files that end with .sql and to add the tag [DB-CHANGE] to the commit message if you do. I would like some feedback before I apply. Like

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 21:57, Edison Su wrote: Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852e50ebd99d4a72fd51d1753b05eb on 4.3-forward branch. I do see the rule coming on the kvm host: -A FORWARD -o cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0 -A FORWARD -i cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 2:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852e50ebd99d4a72fd51d1753b05eb on 4.3-forward > branch. > I do

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Marcus, I¹ve pushed the fix to master already. You probably need to sync your local branch with master Kelven On 3/14/14, 11:08 AM, "Marcus" wrote: >It's in branch resize-root > >On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Min Chen wrote: >> Marcus, >> >> What is the latest commit you have pick

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852e50ebd99d4a72fd51d1753b05eb on 4.3-forward branch. I do see the rule coming on the kvm host: -A FORWARD -o cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0 -A FORWARD -i cloudbr0 -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j BF-cloudbr0 -A FORWARD -o cloudbr0 -j DROP -A FORW

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 2:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Edison Su [mailto:ed

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

When I originally wrote this integration there was no way to solve the Same-Origin issue. I wrote this implementation 2 years ago and I just ported it the the 4.4 code base recently to potentially make available to the community. Currently: If you want to have Swift available on its own host whic

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > The following change will the be root cause: > > -refs = execute("iptables

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Nice job, Edison! :) On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Edison Su wrote: > The following change will the be root cause: > > -refs = execute("iptables -n -L " + brfw + " |grep " + brfw + " | > cut -d \( -f2 | awk '{print $1}'").strip() > +refs = execute("""iptables -n -L " + brfw +

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

The following change will the be root cause: -refs = execute("iptables -n -L " + brfw + " |grep " + brfw + " | cut -d \( -f2 | awk '{print $1}'").strip() +refs = execute("""iptables -n -L " + brfw + " | awk '/%s(.*)references/ {gsub(/\(/, "") ;print $3}'""" % brfw).strip() In co

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

I agree. It's not immediately clear to me why there's a prerequisite that the traffic for both mgmt servers and swift have to go to the same IP. It also eliminates the use of v1.0 and v1 for other purposes, as its very common for REST API routes to start with something like that (say the CS mgmt se

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 19:36, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:19 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) On 14.03.2014 19:14, Edison Su wrote: Hi Nux, Could you post secu

RE: cherrypick to 4.3

If I build another RC I will pick it up From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:43 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: cherrypick to 4.3 Animesh, one more commit for the same bug needs to be cherry-picked: 94817c1b4b89cfa69f2db50a7060dcb7d7c39dbb

Re: cherrypick to 4.3

Animesh, one more commit for the same bug needs to be cherry-picked: 94817c1b4b89cfa69f2db50a7060dcb7d7c39dbb -alena. From: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@c

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

What I am trying to say is the public domain name for CloudStack mgt server and cloud storage(either swift and S3) can be different. For example, the cloudstack mgt server can have a domain name, like your-company.com, which mapping to a pubic ip address @ 52.53.53.55, while cloud storage can ha

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > > Sent

Re: Review Request 19034: Assigning LB rule to vm nic secondary ip

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19034/#review37257 --- api/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRulesService.java

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:19 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 14.03.2014 19:14, Edison Su wrote: > > Hi Nux, > >Could you post security group log fi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bridge functionality

I would also like to chime in on this. Our customers routinely make use of bridging vlans out into dedicated infrastructure, and a way to automate this with SDN deployments would be welcome. I might even be able to get some dev resources to assist with the development. Thanks, -Nate On Thu, M

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 19:14, Edison Su wrote: Hi Nux, Could you post security group log file on your 4.3 kvm host? The file is @/var/log/cloudstack/agent/security_group.log Thanks Edison, but the problem went away once I replaced that python script with https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cl

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Hi Nux, Could you post security group log file on your 4.3 kvm host? The file is @/var/log/cloudstack/agent/security_group.log > -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:06 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache

RE: Anybody saw this error on master?

GPUGroup.getEnabledVGPUTypes was added in XenServer 6.2 SP1, it doesn't exist in 6.2. Tina > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: 14 March 2014 5:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Anybody saw this error on master? > > I am using Xen

Re: Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

Thanks, Daan! On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Seif Eddine Jemli > > > added > > And I added you to administrators for the project, Mike > > -- > Daan > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, Sol

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

For a new feature, I’d agree that squashed-merge is better. From: Marcus mailto:shadow...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Friday, March 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

It's in branch resize-root On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Min Chen wrote: > Marcus, > > What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local setup from > master? Our QA reports similar issues caused by recent VMSync bug fix, > just want to make sure that your local code has that

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Ok, thanks. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Kelven Yang wrote: > That¹s my bad. I cherry-picked a fix after IAM¹s merge and this has broken > it. The problem didn¹t show up in my local run. > > I¹m working on a fix of it. > > Kelven > > On 3/14/14, 9:47 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: > >>Marcus, >> >>

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Maybe, although to some extent the action of merging I think should be seen as saying "this is complete". If the history is important, it could perhaps be kept around in the feature branch until it becomes irrelevant. Of course it may have minor issues that aren't known, but I think the ability to

Re: database version changed to 4.5 on master and it breaks the build

You shouldn't have to. I've got an automated test run that does the same and that succeeded before I committed the db change. I do a clean before jetty:run but that shouldn't matter. Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 14 mrt. 2014, at 18:25, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > > My master version is 38

RE: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Just a thought about the squashed merge, if there are multiple developers working on a feature branch as in this case, won't it be better to preserve the change history? -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 9:35 AM To: dev@cloudstac

Re: database version changed to 4.5 on master and it breaks the build

My master version is 384eeaf79261c3f744daa138369a424d3ef37295, so all the fixes from remote are in my local repo. I observe the error after executing the regular sequence of: mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run Hugo

Re: database version changed to 4.5 on master and it breaks the build

On 14.03.2014 17:15, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Observing following error on master after re-deploying the DB and running clean maven build: [ERROR] Nested in org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is com.cloud.utils.ex

database version changed to 4.5 on master and it breaks the build

Observing following error on master after re-deploying the DB and running clean maven build: [ERROR] Nested in org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextException: Failed to start bean 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Database versi

Re: Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Seif Eddine Jemli added And I added you to administrators for the project, Mike -- Daan

Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

I am using XenServer 6.2 Thanks -min On 3/14/14 12:45 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" wrote: >Hi Min, > >Which version of XS you are working on? > >--Sanjay > >-Original Message- >From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:18 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Sub

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

That¹s my bad. I cherry-picked a fix after IAM¹s merge and this has broken it. The problem didn¹t show up in my local run. I¹m working on a fix of it. Kelven On 3/14/14, 9:47 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Marcus, > > What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local setup from >master?

Re: Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

Seif Eddine Jemli On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > who? > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to assign a JIRA ticket to someone who has a JIRA account, > but I > > don't see his name in the list (I see plenty of other na

Re: Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

who? On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to assign a JIRA ticket to someone who has a JIRA account, but I > don't see his name in the list (I see plenty of other names in the list I > recognize, though). > > Any thoughts on what I might be missing here? > >

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Marcus, What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local setup from master? Our QA reports similar issues caused by recent VMSync bug fix, just want to make sure that your local code has that fix. Thanks -min On 3/14/14 9:37 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Before merge

Re: Review Request 19039: CLOUDSTACK-2266: Adding automation tests for IP reservation feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19039/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 4:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edu

Re: Master is broken?

ApiDispatcher#dispatchAbout the previous questions, I think checkUuid() should be executed in any case. Actually this part was added recently, before that there was already the return to avoid getting to the cmd.execute(). So I think when the checkUuid was added it should have been added for any c

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Before merge, I did a sanity zone and VM deployment test, and worked fine on my setup after fixing the issues introduced by Antonio's commit. I can verify this again today. From the symptom, it seems not related to IAM change. Thanks -min On 3/14/14 1:07 AM, "Marcus" wrote: >creating a new ro

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Thanks Marcus. I am not aware of this convention, will remember that next time when I do the merge. -min On 3/13/14 10:30 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we >are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve >history.

Re: Master is broken?

Hi Talluri. I am trying to know what causes the issue you describe. Just to make sure I understand you, why do you think this issue is related with this change? Anybody knows anything else about it? Thanks. Cheers Antonio 2014-03-14 14:17 GMT+01:00 Srikanteswararao Talluri < srikanteswararao.tall

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward > > Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as ma

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Fair enough, i’ll try to send a reminder for the next phases a bit earlier. Just wanted to make sure that people wouldn’t forget to put their merge requests in on time. I’m trying to be a bit strict about the timing, we are already seeing the strain on the 4.3 release which isn’t even out ther

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

> On March 13, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > Also why don't start routers in parallel? First, get all the router nics in > > one query like John suggested, then span start process for routers in > > separate threads, check the status of each job using Future. Sure I will do tha

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

> On March 13, 2014, 4:46 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 756 > > > > > > Two queries are executed in this for loop which puts stress on the > > database and slows do

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote: Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. I got it from

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 03/14/2014 03:29 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? Yes, fresh 4.2.1. /Ove -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. My colleague who i

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Yes, you did. I for one was up until 2AM trying to test my branch against the current master to try to get it in, but gave up. I think most people saw "Get your merge request in today because I'll be cutting the branch on Friday". At the time that most of us in the west read that email, "get your

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Since a lot of devs are basing their features that have not yet been placed in Git off of master (which is now 4.5), we need to make sure it is clear not to rebase yourself beyond 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db or 4.5 code that should not be in 4.4 could be brought into 4.4. On Fri, Mar

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

The branch is already cut and master has already been switched to 4.5.0. I’ve announced that the switch would be at 14:00 CET, you can’t expect me to get up in the middle of the night to cut a release branch. Cheers, Hugo On 14 mrt. 2014, at 16:09, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Can time be give

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late. On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it >shouldn¹t be a surprise. > >But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the >ML i see no problem with merging it in i

Re: Git Push Summary

On 14/03/14 8:24 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey Muralli, > >The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i¹m not >going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number >are already updated. > >Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it wil

[ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Can time be given till PST EOD as many developers are also in this time zone? If specific features are being pulled in to 4.4, we might as well cut branch a little later where approved merge queue is cleared. -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citri

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it shouldn’t be a surprise. But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the ML i see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of the trouble with master. Just make sure it hits both mast

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the master and commit there features. -1 for the timing to cut the branch ! On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: > >>Repository: cloudstack >>Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/4.

Re: Git Push Summary

Hey Muralli, The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i’m not going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number are already updated. Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it will be easy to pull into master and 4.4. Cheers, H

Assigning a JIRA ticket to someone

Hi, I'm trying to assign a JIRA ticket to someone who has a JIRA account, but I don't see his name in the list (I see plenty of other names in the list I recognize, though). Any thoughts on what I might be missing here? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

The build is not broken. I, personally, just cannot start VMs in my environment, even after starting afresh. It may still be something I'm doing (like a missed behavioral change), but I've seen at least one bug submitted overnight that looks like a stack trace I got. It would be nice to see if anyo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote: Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. Do you happen t

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Other alternative is to block further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed. As long as BVTs are good then it can be opened up for further check ins. Just a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:40 AM To: dev@cloudstac

Re: Git Push Summary

On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: cloudstack >Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d > Hugo, I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready to be checked-in an

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Yes, having a temp freeze of the codebase while a build is broken is standard procedure at several places I've worked at. We should probably employ such a technique here, too. It's nothing enforced by the VCS - just something devs control when they see such an e-mail. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

OK, then ignore my previous email. it looks no issue with security_group.py 2014-03-14 15:43 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Nux and Ove, >> >> Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? >> >> > Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the problem. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ? git checkout 0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py scp to all hosts, and try again. -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote: Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the problem. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as many of those changes are intended for 4.3.1 and not 4.3. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is > g

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is going through RC. It is meant for maintenance release. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Dif

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

It may even just be a behavioral change or something simple I missed that is now required with a recent check-in. Obviously I don't feel comfortable merging in my feature branch though when I pull from master and can no longer run my own feature tests. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Marcus wrot

Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Right, I think it's dangerous to sync 4.3.1 to 4.3 because developers might have changes in 4.3.1 that are not yet in master. This is not my situation personally, but I imagine some devs might be in this state. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrot

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

I'm not sure what the offending ones are at the moment, and there was recently a feature merge that was not squashed, so it might be a little difficult to weed through. On Mar 14, 2014 7:45 AM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: > Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master be blocked for further >

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37199 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mike Tutkowski On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m.,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Nux and Ove, Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform? -Wei 2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! : > On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? >> > > Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. > My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG rules > wor

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

any idea ? Le 13/03/2014 16:55, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com a écrit : Yes : mysql> select * from vlan where vlan_gateway = '10.200.244.129' and vlan_netmask = '255.255.255.192' ; +-+-++-+---++--

RE: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward

Yes that is my understanding that all of these would go in to next maintenance that is why they are staged in forward branch. -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:38 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Differences

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37198 --- server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote: Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM. My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG rules work as expected (though ipset update still requires VM stop/start). Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #2

See

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 18:58, Nux! wrote: On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: -1 In Adv SG zone assigning secondary IPs to a NIC doesn't update the ipset accordingly on the agent/hv; it requires stopping/sta

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #428

See Changes: [koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting [Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-6143: Storage motion support for hyper-v. With these changes a volume on a shared [muralimmreddy] -introduces 'Dist

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144? 2014-03-14 14:57 GMT+01:00 Wei ZHOU : > Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform? > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform? 2014-03-14 14:51 GMT+01:00 Ove Ewerlid : > It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM. > I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's. > When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM. > /Ove > > > On 03/14/

Re: Review Request 19036: CLOUDSTACK-6092: Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37196 --- Commit 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db in cloudstack's bran

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #1

See -- [...truncated 60 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor Or

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM. I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's. When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM. /Ove On 03/14/2014 02:41 PM, Ove Ewerlid wrote: On 03/14/2014 01:57 PM, Nux! wrote: On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: I

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

-1 given the regression in Security Groups for advanced zones. I was able to duplicate NUX reported issues, e.g., works in ACS421 but does not work at all in ACS43. /Ove On 03/13/2014 01:26 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master be blocked for further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed. Talluri is running BVTs and can that be taken as basic passing criteria to re-enable check-ins. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, M

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 03/14/2014 01:57 PM, Nux! wrote: On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: It looks like the traffic doesn't go in the right chains, all traffic is accepted as FORWARD is set to ACCEPT. There are zero packets going through BF-breth0-109. Here's outputs from: iptables-save: http://paste.fedoraproject.

Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Will be doing it today, however it seems that there have been some new issues that have cropped up in master that break basic functionality. I'm not sure if anyone should merge or not while that is the case. I was attempting to validate that the latest merges played well in my branch, but I couldn

Re: Master is broken?

I am seeing another issue on master. Filed a bug for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6239 Thanks, ~Talluri On 14/03/14 3:50 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios > wrote: >> antonio.fornie > > >is in > >-- >Daan

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

hi guys, i have resolved all issues with fixes and refactoring of plugin code, its good to go now , i'll submit once i get the ship it message. thanks for the review. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, punith s wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://re

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote: It looks like the traffic doesn't go in the right chains, all traffic is accepted as FORWARD is set to ACCEPT. There are zero packets going through BF-breth0-109. Here's outputs from: iptables-save: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/85337/47982321/raw/ ebatables-sav

  1   2   >