Can we get the fix in 4.4? I'd rather sync that then master, since it
has been cut already.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kelven Yang <kelven.y...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> I¹ve pushed the fix to master already. You probably need to sync your
> local branch with master
>
> Kelven
>
> On 3/14/14, 11:08 AM, "Marcus" <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It's in branch resize-root
>>
>>On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Marcus,
>>>
>>> What is the latest commit you have picked up on your local
>>>setup from
>>> master? Our QA reports similar issues caused by recent VMSync bug fix,
>>> just want to make sure that your local code has that fix.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -min
>>>
>>> On 3/14/14 9:37 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Before merge, I did a sanity zone and VM deployment test, and worked
>>>>fine
>>>>on my setup after fixing the issues introduced by Antonio's commit. I
>>>>can
>>>>verify this again today. From the symptom, it seems not related to IAM
>>>>change.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>-min
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 3/14/14 1:07 AM, "Marcus" <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>creating a new router does the same...
>>>>>
>>>>>2014-03-14 02:06:41,446 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
>>>>>(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Unable to update
>>>>>VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running; updated=3;
>>>>>time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1; State=Running;
>>>>>updated=3; time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} Stale Data: {Host=1;
>>>>>State=Starting; updated=2; time=Fri Mar 14 02:05:52 MDT 2014}
>>>>>2014-03-14 02:06:41,448 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>>>(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Failed to start
>>>>>instance VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]
>>>>>com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to transition
>>>>>to a new state.
>>>>>at
>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineM
>>>>>an
>>>>>a
>>>>>gerImpl.java:1029)
>>>>>at
>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManag
>>>>>er
>>>>>I
>>>>>mpl.java:775)
>>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm
>>>>>> unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago.
>>>>>>I
>>>>>> can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it
>>>>>> can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,356 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
>>>>>> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Unable to update
>>>>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running;
>>>>>> updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1;
>>>>>> State=Running; updated=19; time=Fri Mar 14 01:57:11 MDT 2014} Stale
>>>>>> Data: {Host=1; State=Starting; updated=18; time=Fri Mar 14 01:56:38
>>>>>> MDT 2014}
>>>>>> 2014-03-14 01:57:46,359 ERROR [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>>>> (Work-Job-Executor-1:Job-33/Job-34 ctx-5fc7b113) Failed to start
>>>>>> instance VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-1-VM]
>>>>>> com.cloud.exception.ConcurrentOperationException: Unable to
>>>>>>transition
>>>>>> to a new state.
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachine
>>>>>>Ma
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>agerImpl.java:1029)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachine
>>>>>>Ma
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>agerImpl.java:5129)
>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.j
>>>>>>av
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>:57)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccess
>>>>>>or
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>mpl.java:43)
>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerPro
>>>>>>xy
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>java:107)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineM
>>>>>>an
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>gerImpl.java:5274)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInC
>>>>>>on
>>>>>>t
>>>>>>ext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:491)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Man
>>>>>>ag
>>>>>>e
>>>>>>dContextRunnable.java:49)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.cal
>>>>>>l(
>>>>>>D
>>>>>>efaultManagedContext.java:56)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callW
>>>>>>it
>>>>>>h
>>>>>>Context(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWi
>>>>>>th
>>>>>>C
>>>>>>ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Manag
>>>>>>ed
>>>>>>C
>>>>>>ontextRunnable.java:46)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(As
>>>>>>yn
>>>>>>c
>>>>>>JobManagerImpl.java:448)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471
>>>>>>)
>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.j
>>>>>>av
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>:1145)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>>>>>>ja
>>>>>>v
>>>>>>a:615)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether
>>>>>>>we
>>>>>>> are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or
>>>>>>>preserve
>>>>>>> history. It's nice to preserve history, but it's a lot easier to
>>>>>>>undo
>>>>>>> a squashed merge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>> IAM branch is now merged to master.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/13/14 10:13 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Since we haven't heard of any objections to this merge for 3 days,
>>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>>am
>>>>>>>>>going to merge it to master today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>>>>>-min
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 3/11/14 12:23 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 11 mrt. 2014, at 19:52, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, have already run FingBugs on our branch and addressed all
>>>>>>>>>>>new
>>>>>>>>>>> findings introduced by our branch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Awesome! :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/14 7:33 PM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No new jar dependencies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 7:22 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any new jar dependencies?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/14, 11:34 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prachi and I would like to merge CloudStack Identity and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Access
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Management(IAM) plugin services to the master branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this effort has been done by Prachi and me on ACS rbac branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=sh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>log;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s/heads/rbac).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checklists for the merge:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. JIRA ticket:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Functional Specs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudSt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ac
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>k
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+Ide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ti
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin. We have proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feature
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back in Jan, and accommodated all the feedbacks in our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>implementation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Unit tests for the feature are available at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services/iam/server/test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (for iam server) and services/iam/plugin/test (for iam
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>plugin).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Marvin integration tests for the feature are available at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test/integration/smoke/test_vm_iam.py.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Branch has been rebased with master branch up to commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 63e3eea7905e22cab9466b28a2ab2a80b586aeed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. RAT test has been passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -min
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
