Re: Font question in GUI

On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I needed to set up a CloudPlatform 4.2 environment today to perform a > certification test and noticed this font issue exists on 4.2, as well. Mike, I think there are lots of issues with the UI, see [1] My main concern is that there was no

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Real quick, because I don't know if I will be able to track this > thread in detail starting tonight... Take this as input to the > discussion that the whole community needs to have about the > *potential* problem with the current situation. >

Re: Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18027/#review35136 --- Commit c04fb68fc7022c9d3ef6206d314194c3ce2a1872 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18027/#review35135 --- Commit f1f79586da64cf3ad79ea7698927f10920b0d18d in cloudstack's bran

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Yeah, that's an option too. It's sometimes very inconvenient, but that's what was intended. At any rate I don't think we want to automatically create multiple templates of different sizes after upload, I'd rather see the root resize. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Heh,

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

If someone gets around to it they can add in root resize support via the patch I've posted to the list once or twice. I can maybe look at updating it for master and testing if I can find some time. It's a very short patch, but the testing is what I don't have time for at the moment, more of a prior

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Don't you already have dropbox support? Just go into your drop box and fetch a public URL, add &qcow2 to fool the file type checker, and it should pull the thing down. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Heh, AWS seems to manage fine without it. But that is AWS. > Service o

Re: VMware and NFS

For XS that¹s not required as its pushed into XS directly. I also think secondary storage is mounted for Vmware on MS to copy the system vm template to Primary storage. On 20/02/14 9:13 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >So, just to be sure I have this correct, the management server mounts >secondary

Re: VMware and NFS

I typically use Ubuntu for the management server; however, today I needed to install CloudPlatform (the Citrix-branded version of CloudStack) on CentOS and it seemed to work fine with XenServer (I didn't try it with VMware). I had my NFS share for secondary storage on Ubuntu still, though. On Th

Re: VMware and NFS

So, just to be sure I have this correct, the management server mounts secondary storage regardless of hypervisor type due to systemvm.iso. Is that correct? Thanks On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > F

RE: VMware and NFS

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:54 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > > Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to remember > there being something unusual a

Re: Authentication and devCloud

User authenticators are defined in the bean userAuthenticatorsRegistry defined in cloudstack/core/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-core-registry-core-context.xml Each of these authenticators are called once in the order until the authentication is successful in any of them. you should

RE: VMware and NFS

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] > Sent: 21 February 2014 09:59 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: VMware and NFS > > h.I have been scoring docs etcit would not surprise me... > Can any of the dev guys possibly elabo

RE: VMware and NFS

h.I have been scoring docs etcit would not surprise me... Can any of the dev guys possibly elaborate? BTW Mike, I finally gave up on making 4.x work with centos and just used ubuntuit worked like a charm. So I can only guess that something is up with the newer versions of CS w

Re: VMware and NFS

Yes, the hypervisor does need to mount the NFS share, but I seem to remember there being something unusual about VMware in that the management server needed to be able to mount the NFS share, as well. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > Interesting as I do see errors in th

RE: VMware and NFS

Interesting as I do see errors in the mgmt log in regards to /mnt/sec...however if I am understanding the architecture correctly isn't it the hypervisor that needs access to the secondary storage? The mgmt server only needs to access secondary storage to be able to seed the templates right? >

RE: VMware and NFS

Yes to both... > From: nitin.me...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: VMware and NFS > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:39:01 + > > Couple of questions. > Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you > mount that template location in sec. storage on

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I find a little ironic that the internal policies are a lot more restrictive than the Apache license itself :S Meanwhile, isn't CloudStack falling into the MySQL FOSS exception? http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/ Francois On 2/20/2014, 9:20 PM, David Nalley wrote: On

Re: VMware and NFS

I may be remembering this incorrectly, but for VMware doesn't the management server have to be able to mount the secondary storage NFS share to /mnt/sec? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Couple of questions. > Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And

Re: VMware and NFS

Couple of questions. Did you seed the system vm template onto the sec. storage ? And can you mount that template location in sec. storage on your management server ? On 20/02/14 6:32 PM, "Michael Phillips" wrote: >Hey dev guys, I just recently got CS up and running with vmware. However >I am run

VMware and NFS

Hey dev guys, I just recently got CS up and running with vmware. However I am running into an issue where it seems my esxi hosts are not mounting the secondary NFS storage. NFS is working as I can mount to it from other linux boxes, and I can mount a NFS datastore from the hypervisors. In my lo

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > I may be wrong here, and far from being an expert at this, but isn't the > MariaDB connector doing the same thing, but under a Lesser GPL license? > Which would solve a lot of licensing issues (no need to put CloudStack > entirely on GP

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I may be wrong here, and far from being an expert at this, but isn't the MariaDB connector doing the same thing, but under a Lesser GPL license? Which would solve a lot of licensing issues (no need to put CloudStack entirely on GPL). FG On 2/20/2014, 5:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Real quick,

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Heh, AWS seems to manage fine without it. But that is AWS. Service offerings are only for compute, there is a separate disk offering for the data volumes. Presumably the data volumes can be used for persistent storage (e.g., db files). What is the difference between a 40G Drupal template and an 80G

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 67fc2f5

Hi folks, I've been working on the legal issue wrt mysql-connector-java dependency, and it's worse than originally feared. We have a compile dependency on GPL'ed software. This was committed to master (and 4.3) back in November. We have not released this software. Please consider this a -1 (veto)

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

On 20.02.2014 23:04, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature request? It's been here for a while: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5305 It's a major PITA for me (and I imagine for anyone else who wants to sell cloud publicly).

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Nux, that's an entirely different problem. Care to raise a feature request? On 2/20/14 11:34 AM, "Nux!" wrote: >On 19.02.2014 22:12, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before >> the templates can be imported into secondary sto

Authentication and devCloud

Hi! I am a student and I'm doing work about authentication CloudStack. Does anyone could provide me a document or picture that explains the authentication model, or a reference that I can use as an introduction? Moreover, I have trying to install devCloud , but I have a problem with maven . Th

Re: Font question in GUI

I needed to set up a CloudPlatform 4.2 environment today to perform a certification test and noticed this font issue exists on 4.2, as well. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Anyone know if there is already a JIRA ticket open for this issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Real quick, because I don't know if I will be able to track this thread in detail starting tonight... Take this as input to the discussion that the whole community needs to have about the *potential* problem with the current situation. Legal documentation as well as application of the "valid lice

RE: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

> -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:45 AM > To: > Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Ian Southam > Subject: Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130 > > Hey, > > Should be fixed by: > commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d7

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of > fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers I'm sorry to say that I do not have the available cycles. $dayjob + getting ready for a few days off

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Nate Gordon wrote: > Will this cause issues with people running ACS from maven jetty (or any > other maven operation that needs the db) if the connector isn't pulled in > by the pom? I could see it being added to support that need. If they are > running it from a

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Will this cause issues with people running ACS from maven jetty (or any other maven operation that needs the db) if the connector isn't pulled in by the pom? I could see it being added to support that need. If they are running it from a tomcat instance managed by eclipse, it would be pretty easy

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

You are right Chiradeep, When talking about real simple installations It would be nice, though. for a bit more you would not want this indeed. So it would be an extra for the administrator. I still like the idea. As for you wiki page, I presume you want to propose both implementations, Or are you

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

Sent from my iPhone > On 20 feb. 2014, at 18:31, Srikanteswararao Talluri > wrote: > > > >> On 20/02/14 7:14 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Should be fixed by: >> commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 >> Author: Hugo Trippaers >> Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

On 19.02.2014 22:12, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Hi all, The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before the templates can be imported into secondary storage is an inconvenience. I am not sure how much of an inconvenience it is, but I was asked to detail the technical architectu

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

This isn't for the admin. The end user has no access to the MS file system or any direct access to the secondary storage NFS server. The only frontend available to the NFS secondary share is the SSVM. Re: dropbox: that is already available : enter a URL. On 2/20/14 11:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

Yes, shouldn't take to much work. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:01 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > You mean to load files off the management server, yea? That makes sense to me > > On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Daan Hoogland > mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > why not a allowing a simple file://

Re: Review Request 18277: CLOUDSTACK-6015: initial check in for selenium based client side automated testing

Sebastien: I'll add apache license headers to them, possibly together with some code that I want to submit. But how do I add a wiki page? I created an account for myself for https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/. I saw Parth Jagirdar has a page un

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I will try to work on this a bit this evening, but others may be faster. --David On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of > fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers > > Thanks > Animes

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Hi Karl, An separate way to VR to configure keepalived/conntrackd besides cloud-early-setup is a must without doubt. But a separate API may not be necessary. So here is the question: can keepalived/conntrackd used independently regardless of network setup? I think the answer for now is no. I be

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking care of fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:13 AM > To: dev@cloudstack

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

> On Feb. 20, 2014, 6:17 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > > > Also I've confirmed that even with this option, the MAC would show in > > dnsmasq.log, which is necessary for debug. > > > > Applied to MASTER. Thanks! One moment, on a second thought, even with current setup, dnsm

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

> On Feb. 20, 2014, 6:17 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > > > Also I've confirmed that even with this option, the MAC would show in > > dnsmasq.log, which is necessary for debug. > > > > Applied to MASTER. Thanks! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > One moment, on a second thought, e

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/#review35021 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Also I've confirmed that even with this

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/#review35020 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Also I've confirmed that even with this

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling >> a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize >> in advance; i

RE: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Because I am a Citrix employee, who has the day-to-day work to complete. There was a mail thread that only post 4.3 release, we can switch to RST. Let me hunt down. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:05 PM To: dev@cloudstack

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java > depen

Re: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

On 20/02/14 8:40 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu" wrote: >Yes, > >sdn.ovs.controller = true >sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = GUEST // label used on XenServer >guest network > >Without the OVS controller switched on, I think one will not see the OVS >bridge created. >The first part of the setup works,

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi, > > From Citrix-perspective, this is going to be effort intensive considering the > current head count for documentation. > Citrix has no standing in Apache CloudStack decisions. What is your individual opinion with your CloudSta

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

On 20/02/14 7:14 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey, > >Should be fixed by: >commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 >Author: Hugo Trippaers >Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014 +0100 > >Fix parameter index in getCount function. > > >@Talluri, Agreed. However with the current way of te

RE: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Hi, >From Citrix-perspective, this is going to be effort intensive considering the >current head count for documentation. For 4.3, we would like to continue with DocBook, as per our earlier consensus. I shall come back with a concrete plan soon after completing the 4.3 feature documentation.

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

You mean to load files off the management server, yea? That makes sense to me On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: why not a allowing a simple file:///home/me/my.template kind of url? for simple installations this should do. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling > a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize > in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. > > I've

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java dependency, I'm -1 (binding) until that is resolved. -chip

Re: Review Request 18309: sysctl improvements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18309/#review35005 --- systemvm/patches/debian/buildsystemvm.sh

Fwd: Warning from dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Hi guys, I got this in my mail box from last year. I honestly do not know how I missed this. Isn't this a little odd as I have been able to mail you guys successfully. Kind Regards, Onuonga Frankie -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM Subject: Warnin

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #320

See

Re: Xen Server Setup

Hi, Sorry for the late response. If you can describe your setup I am sure I can get you in motion. thanks. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Has anyone setup a public facing cloudstack with Xen server. I want to be > able to provide the internal systems with a 10.x IP add

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

All, Here's what I've got so far with partitioning the problem. There are 3 main areas I've found so far along with a proposal for implementation. Keepalived: As Is: Current VRR network configuration setup is assumed by the existing code to be static. A single Keepalived config template file

[DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

Hi, With the change of format for docs, I have started to refactor the main docs repo "cloudstack-docs.git" The allocator,midonet,nicira,qig,vxlan and release notes guides have been converted to .rst format. I am moving the docbook version of these guides into an /archive directory for the ti

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #319

See -- [...truncated 17386 lines...] 1443/1875 KB 1446/1875 KB 1449/1875 KB 1453/1875 KB 1457/1875 KB 1461/1875 KB 1465/1875 KB 1469/1875 KB 1473/1875 KB 1477/1875 KB 1480/1

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Yes, sdn.ovs.controller = true sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = GUEST // label used on XenServer guest network Without the OVS controller switched on, I think one will not see the OVS bridge created. The first part of the setup works, allocating a GRE key from the VLAN range, setting up the

[Responsiveess report] 2014w06 usr

http://markmail.org/message/4r3hlg4rsdus42gu DNS question by Zack Payton http://markmail.org/message/tnfl6rz2ncbiyqle Can't start cloudstack-usage by Sean Hamilton http://markmail.org/message/py4tv4cehmp4klrl Reg: Storage tags by Prakash.M http://markmail.org/message/qdbuihkh4yyjycx2 CloudStack sto

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Have you set sdn.ovs.controller = true And sdn.ovs.controller.default.label = < > in the global settings (and restarted mgmt. server) Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Florin Dum

RE: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

Hi Paul, I would be very curious to hear your feedback. I am not able to get GRE working with RC6. The OVS bridge is created, but the GRE tunnel is not. So far I have tried (using XenServer 6.1.0): a) 2 hosts within different clusters and different pods b) 2 hosts within different cluster and sam

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6015

Yichi has submitted a review to add selenium tests. But for some reason I can't assign him the 6015 bug. Could someone with karma try ? thanks On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:43 PM, Yichi Lu wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Yichi Lu > Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:13 PM > Su

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I agree totally, my point was that while there is nothing technically stopping us going for w2k3 there is little reason to do so. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: David Nalley [m

Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend

> On Feb. 19, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > It seems good to me. Applies cleanly to master and builds just fine. > > > > Code-wise it's simple but effective, should allow us to support Gluster. I just merged it into master and pushed. So gluster is in master right now! Niels,

[Responsiveness report] 2014w02 dev

http://markmail.org/message/xyhzffhc44dqxgxo devcloud system VMs problem by Victor Rodionov for an explanation of this report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Responsiveness+report -- Daan

[Responsiveness report] 2014w04 dev

http://markmail.org/message/ocv5dj36xbfdm7wp UI Issues by Alex Hitchins http://markmail.org/message/ats22vo6benycwgm Doc Build Reflects No Recent Changes ! by Radhika Puthiyetath http://markmail.org/message/j7lms5py3cszmn5z OpenVswitch | KVM | CentOS 6.5 | Cloudstack 4.2 by Maurice Lawler for an

[Responsiveness report] 2014w03 dev

http://markmail.org/message/cwuq5dgkya4qhpnj Why i cannot set vpn on Source NAT IP by Yitao Jiang http://markmail.org/message/55ydrna6ikmjiuf5 CloudStack 4.2 | Cent OS 6.4 | KVM by Maurice Lawler http://markmail.org/message/z3b2yeg6zidcjkwq Issue in creating template from volume in vmware hyperviso

[Responsiveness report] 2014w05 dev

http://markmail.org/message/2uu5ly7is3i6tkqn Error creating bean with name 'lockMasterListener' by Alex Hitchins http://markmail.org/message/4zatk66ild4xsxwa Unable to add host with latest build on RHEL6 master by Manikanta Kattamuri http://markmail.org/message/qoq3734bm7abhk7e RSA Key Issue by Ale

[Responsiveness report] 2014w05 usr

http://markmail.org/message/6qcus5e7qihkh2sy Agent kvm not start: Not allowed to connect to the server: sent incorrect data center: default by e.angi...@libero.it http://markmail.org/message/wwkauchx7o73kidk agent can't start by e.angi...@libero.it http://markmail.org/message/o7m6mwhdyli5dazc Trou

Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Hugo Trippaers, and Sheng Yang. R

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

On 02/20/2014 02:37 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. My apologies, I didn't find the

Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130

Hey, Should be fixed by: commit ba7ff5369cc602c7e0c8d788b6617f27123c2328 Author: Hugo Trippaers Date: Thu Feb 20 14:04:51 2014 +0100 Fix parameter index in getCount function. @Talluri, Agreed. However with the current way of testing it is really hard to see which commit actually broke

Review Request 18309: sysctl improvements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18309/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, daan Hoogland, and Hugo Trippaers. R

[DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

Hi folks, I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to RC6. I've been playing with 4.3.0-rc6 for a couple of days now. I attempted to build

Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

There's a difference in incidentally working and validated to work on. I'd limit focus to making sure it works on 2k12r2. --David On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - that said It's > old and I can't see people hav

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) Tested: XenServer 6.2, Primary NFS, Secondary NFS, Two physical networks with Guest traffic on both Tested 64bit systemvm template (jenkins version) Tested SSVM using the Xen VHD template Tested instance creation on VLAN based networks Tested instance creation on NS

Re: Review Request 18165: FindBugs findings: fixing equals() methods in 2 classes; commenting out dead variable in 1 class; adding 5 tests to cover the changes in the equals() methods.

> On Feb. 15, 2014, 12:53 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Heya, did you test this with devcloud as well? > > Wilder Rodrigues wrote: > Unfortunately not. I got the link error when trying it in my environment > over my network. Will try to refresh the mac addresses on the net adapters in >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 Have now successfully tested the new VPC Remote VPN feature, and all other tests pass (based on upgrading a clean build from 4.2.1 and deploying new Zone) Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Origina

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) based on the rc-5 testing I've done and a diff of the releases. The extra patch I asked for is being tested by Hugo, no doubt he will approve shortly. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Folks I want to cle

Re: Can't login to webui

Hi, I find this sometimes happens if enough ram is not available. Please insure you have at least 2gb of ram. On 19 February 2014 19:37, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Typically Mac OS X 10.8.3 or Ubuntu 12.04. This is always set up for > development purposes. I don't use the scripts that an admin wo

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) > > On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Folks > > > > I want to clear up the confusion on syst

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - that said It's old and I can't see people having a need for it. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Folks I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3 I have noticed the system vms come up with 128 MB ram, isn't this a bit too little for 64bit machines? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.n

Re: Review Request 18016: CLOUDSTACK-5626: Simplifying VM Migrate code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18016/#review34996 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Feb. 14, 2014, 7:54 a.m

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Isn't the hyper-v support dependant on using 2012r2 ? So I don't know if I'd bother with going back as far as 2003 Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh

Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads

why not a allowing a simple file:///home/me/my.template kind of url? for simple installations this should do. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:42 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > We definitely need to support more than http download. http upload sounds > interesting, but I'd love to see something more resi

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

AFAIK, it would be windows server 2k3, 2k8 2012, 2012R2. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:32 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS One question I h

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

One question I have is, Which version of windows we need to target? Thanks & Regards Damodar/ -Original Message- From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Fixed System VM Templates

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/2 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response. If your project does not have this featu

[Proposal] HyperV supporting features in 4.4

Hi All, Hyper-V Hypervisor support is added in 4.3. For 4.4 release, following functionalities will be supported on Hyper-V. We (Rajesh, Devdeep, Anshul) would be working on writing the features for Hyper-V. 1. HA for guest VMs 2. VPC 3. Network throttling 4. Primary storage: iSCSI

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

OK, the systemvm status is making more sense now. For everybody just as confused as me by the current discussion let me try to summarize. SystemVM template build process: Currently there is a build process for the systemvm template in the CloudStack source code. This build process is using v

Re: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0

On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:45 PM, Florin Dumitrascu wrote: > Hi Tuna, > > Can you please clarify what is the status of the functionality described > below in relation to 4.3 release: > > http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html quick note to say that this is not yet

  1   2   >