On 09/11/2013 07:43 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
I think we messed up with the users again this time. Partly a fault
that we can't get beta-quality builds for users to test. Seeing
everyone run 4.2 packages after release announcement
That's a good question, I'm not sure how preconditions work with Marvin cases,
but I know the tests are run generically. Say I run copyvolumeToPrimary (not
sure this test exists, hypothetical at the moment), it gets run against a slew
of infrastructure configurations using local storage as well
If a test is meddling with the infrastructure then we have two
options:
1. isolate the test and run it separately when other tests aren't
running
2. prepare a deployment with those nfs storage preconfigured.
It can be difficult to always get the infra right for a test so tests
often will skip the
But if the test requires some sort of preconfiguration, what then (e.g.
test NFS primary storage would need a local or remote NFS configured)? do I
need to roll my own, or can I touch the existing test infra and do the
preconfigure?
On Sep 11, 2013 12:34 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
> Yes - On
Yes - Once your test goes into the repo, it should get picked in the subsequent
run.
Jenkins installations from various companies can be combined into a single
landing page. Jenkins itself doesn't support master/slave but it does through
the gearman plugin. It's something I have tried using with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14063/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository: cloudstack-gi
I think there are jenkins slaves that run the nicera plugins on/at Schuberg
Philis housed infrastructure. The Citrix jenkins nodes also runs as slaves
that connect back to the apache owned/controlled jenkins. No reason why
testing infra need be so consolidated, it just so happens no one is putting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14077/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Kishan Kavala.
Repository: cloud
CloudStack Dev,
I was emailed about some of the testing questions I brought up
over the last few threads, and a few things were pointed out to me
that I think we should try to remedy. Primarily, that the testing
environment is owned by Citrix, the QA team is primarily Citrix-run,
and the testi
Folks
Now that 4.2.0 VOTE has passed I want to call out for any committers who are
interested in taking over as the release manager for the upcoming 4.2.1
maintenance release and the 4.3.0 release.
Following our 4 month release cycle the feature freeze for 4.3.0 should be by
end of October an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13877/#review26034
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajesh Battala
On Aug. 28, 2013, 8:58 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13877/#review26035
---
Ship it!
Looks good for me.
- Rajesh Battala
On Aug. 28, 2013, 8
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
> I think we messed up with the users again this time. Partly a fault
> that we can't get beta-quality builds for users to test. Seeing
> everyone run 4.2 packages after release announcement and reporting
> critical bugs I wish could've
Thank you! That's my looking for.
Yoshikazu Nojima
2013/9/10 Harikrishna Patnala :
> Hi,
>
> Xenserver
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
>
>
> KVM
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.q
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13806/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2013, 5:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
Hi,
Have you set the global parameter secstorage.allowed.internal.sites ?
On 11-Sep-2013, at 10:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to using KVM with CS.
>
> I noticed under Templates there is CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM).
>
> When I drill down to look at its details, it says
Hi,
I'm new to using KVM with CS.
I noticed under Templates there is CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM).
When I drill down to look at its details, it says it is built in and not
ready.
Any advice on how I can make it "ready?"
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire I
Hi,
This is a minor "issue," but I just wanted to see what people thought.
In the GUI, we have the buttons that line the left side of the display.
One of them is called "Templates."
When you click on it, you can see "Templates" and "ISOs."
The fact that Templates and ISOs are grouped under Tem
Had to remove large artifacts from job being hosted. The downloads
and large artifacts were making jenkins crawl. I'm working on finding
a hosting for these soon.
Meanwhile, all non-oss jars are available on wido's mirror. You should
be able to build from there quickly.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 0
Thanks Mike! Whenever you can get to it!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:50:46PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> I plan to correct the docs once I have the process in place. :)
>
> I first need to make modifications to Java code (for what I'm working on)
> and then re-deploy the DEBs (noting the proce
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:46:43PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> One of the things I've been pondering of late is a set of release
> criteria. E.g. here is what CloudStack MUST do to be considered for
> release.
>
> So as background there is a somewhat complex social contract that I
I plan to correct the docs once I have the process in place. :)
I first need to make modifications to Java code (for what I'm working on)
and then re-deploy the DEBs (noting the process I took).
At present, I played around with stuff a bit and don't recall the exact
steps I took to get it to work
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:22:59PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the info, Ian!
>
> I was following the instructions in 3.5.2 here:
>
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html
>
> Perhaps they are a bit
Hi,
Xenserver
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
KVM
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
VMware (generic)
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
Hi,
I'm looking for latest system vm template file.
It seems jenkins job( build-systemvm-master ) does not generates an artifact.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
Do you know where can we download the latest latest system vm template file?
Thanks,
Yoshikazu N
Thanks a lot for the info, Ian!
I was following the instructions in 3.5.2 here:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html
Perhaps they are a bit incorrect.
Thanks again!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Prasanna Santhanam.
Reposit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14075/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Prasanna Santhanam.
Reposit
So to me it looks like the syntax of your sources.list entry is incorrect
The standard syntax is as follows: ( http://linux.die.net/man/5/sources.list)
type baseuri distribution [component component2 ... compnentN]
With the below outlined setup should work:
1) Your directory structure is:
.
└─
Hi all,
I am adding a plugin to CloudStack. One of the APIs of this plugin
(launchCluster) is to start a haoop cluster on Cloudstack using Whirr. I
included whirr as a dependency to my plugin.
org.apache.whirr
whirr
0.8.2
pom
When I test this api in CloudMonkey I a
We use to be able to download nonoss builds (specifically RPMs for RHEL) in
Jenkins back sometime ago.
I want to try out 4.2 but I can no longer find a downloadable tar.gz file.
Example : http://jenkins.cloudstack.org:8080/job/build-4.0-nonoss-rhel63/
Are we done with providing tar.gz of Jenkin
In CloudStack 4.0 release there was RPM for console proxy
(cloud-console-proxy-4.0.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm); this is not available in 4.2.0
release.
Is this this merged with any other RPMs ? any idea about this ?
Regards,
Rayees
Yes, I we should move the fixVersion 4.2.0 bugs to 4.2.1.
On 11/09/13 2:22 am, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>I changed the fix version for the clvm issue to 4.2.1
>seemed appropriate
>
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The vote has *passed* with the following resu
Hi folks,
One of the things I've been pondering of late is a set of release
criteria. E.g. here is what CloudStack MUST do to be considered for
release.
So as background there is a somewhat complex social contract that I
think we informally enter with our users. People expect us to release
when w
Hi,
Any thoughts on these messages when I run the following (the docs say I can
ignore the missing override file):
mtutkowski@ubuntu:/var/www/cloudstack/repo/binary$ sudo dpkg-scanpackages .
/dev/null | tee Packages | gzip -9 > Packages.gz
tee: Packages: Permission denied
bash: Packages.gz: Permi
OK, thanks, though...I will post it under a different e-mail subject so it
might get more people to see it.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Sorry, maybe someone else can help.
> On Sep 10, 2013 12:42 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Marcus
>>
>> Any thoughts
Ron
I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in time in next
2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation before the formal
annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is appreciated.
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rw
Oh, and to be clear, I don't think anyone is criticizing Animesh's efforts.
He does a great job of keeping track of defect trends and informing the
community.
Let me provide an example for how we did this at HP/LeftHand, which is
where I worked on a clustered SAN technology for seven years before
>>
>> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
>> indicated with a "*" next to their name:
>>
>> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid
>> -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller
>>
>
> FWIW, I am very disappointed by this vote. The result
I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing
longstanding documentation problems.
There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers are
not going to fix them.
The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs. It
is makes the whole proje
>From my point of view, it's hard to 'buy off' on something that has
such a large scope. In the past I've been skiddish to cast a vote,
knowing that I've only tested the things I'm familiar with and I may
very well be casting a +1 for something completely broken. The irony
is that I don't think a
Yep, I agree it's a tight schedule. Whether or not that's a good idea is
beside the point, I suppose.
I also agree some last-minute changes will come in. I was simply pointing
out that I have never encountered over 200 fixes coming into a release in
the final couple weeks. On a project where regre
Including a row in hypervisor_capabilities table for 'Simulator' as
hypervisor type seems to have done the trick.
Thanks again!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:37 AM, David Grizzanti <
david.grizza...@sungard.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions and help. I'll try out what Prasanna sugg
I do believe we had reached a consensus on a market place needing to be
external to the project, but If someone wanted to make connectors/plug-ins for
integration with an existing service, that would be ok.
I'm pretty certain it had to do with legalities/logistics of the project being
attached
The process is laid out. There's exactly 2 months of testing/bug fixing.
Given that schedule it isn't unreasonable that there are last minute
fixes.
Since the release manager is not an expert on any one feature,
he/she cannot judge which fixes should/shouldn't make it into the release.
The RM onl
Sorry, maybe someone else can help.
On Sep 10, 2013 12:42 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Thanks, Marcus
>
> Any thoughts on these messages when I run the following (the docs say I
> can ignore the missing override file):
>
> mtutkowski@ubuntu:/var/www/cloudstack/repo/binary$ sudo dpkg-scanpackages
Sebastien,
I could/would have voted +0 as I don't have a clear picture of the
quality of the release.
this once again comes down to testing in 72 hour and automating it.
Daan
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the
Hi Sebastien,
Personally I felt like I just didn't yet understand our testing/QA process
enough to know if 4.2 was ready or not.
I did voice concerns over the past few weeks regarding the number of
checkins that took place right before a RC was built (since I have never on
any product I've worked
I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the 4.2 release.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated
> with a "*" next to their name:
>
> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasan
I changed the fix version for the clvm issue to 4.2.1
seemed appropriate
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
>
>
> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated
> with a "*" next to their name:
>
> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Pras
Thanks, Marcus
Any thoughts on these messages when I run the following (the docs say I can
ignore the missing override file):
mtutkowski@ubuntu:/var/www/cloudstack/repo/binary$ sudo dpkg-scanpackages .
/dev/null | tee Packages | gzip -9 > Packages.gz
tee: Packages: Permission denied
bash: Package
Haven't done too much with Ubuntu yet, but with centos you can build and
install the packages, OR you can do the mvn, but the mvn developer project
only does the mgmt server portion, you still need to install the agent
packages on your host. This is why I find it easiest to just build packages
and
At this point its not available directly ( you may want to create a
feature request for the same in JIRA )
There is some kind of workaround though. See if it fits your use case (Do
state that if you can)
You can try creating them with tags (storage/compute) and introduce
similar tagged storage/hos
Folks
For the 4.2 release cycle a huge and commendable effort was made by the
community to stick to the time-based release while delivering 85 new features
and improvement and resolving over 1800 defects. I recognize the disappointment
that Marcus and Simon have expressed over not including t
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated
with a "*" next to their name:
+1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid
-1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller
I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now
Hi,
I've been following these instructions, but having a little trouble:
3.5.2. Configuring your machines to use the APT repository
Now that we have created the repository, you need to configure your machine
to make use of the APT repository. You can do this by adding a repository
file under /etc
Open to correction on this one but it appears to be a permissions issue.
I'm assuming your user mtutkowski does not have write access on the
directory /var/www/cloudstack/repo/binary. The sudo will only apply to the
first command not all.
sudo su - # change to root
# execute your commands
exit #
I believe it was a permissions issue with the folder called binary. I did a
sudo chmod 777 binary and now it is able to generate the Packages.gz file.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any thoughts on these messages when I run the f
Thanks, Ian - I believe your suggestion would work, as well.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> Open to correction on this one but it appears to be a permissions issue.
>
> I'm assuming your user mtutkowski does not have write access on the
> directory /var/www/cloudstack/repo/
Hey Marcus,
Figured I'd follow up on this.
I have KVM running in an Ubuntu 12.04.1 VM under VMware Fusion now
(although not added into CS just yet).
I set up two adapters for the VM: 1) Uses NAT (so I can access the
internet) and 2) Uses a host-only network (which is the same network the
VMs KVM
I think that ServiceOfferings are not tied to a specific zone, so they will be
globally available.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 6:59 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: serviceofferings per zone
Hi,
I am looki
Hi,
I've been testing the security groups in advanced zones with 'UK's largest
satellite broadcaster'. We've found that migrated VMs do not get their security
groups re-applied on the new host.
A error appears in the management log saying:
callHostPlugin failed for cmd: network_rules with args
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have
> issues that you want raised to the board, please let me know.
>
> -chip
>
Draft board report here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2013-09+Boar
I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have
issues that you want raised to the board, please let me know.
-chip
- Forwarded message from ASF Board -
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:20:58 +
From: ASF Board
To: Chip Childers
Subject: ASF Board Report for Sep 20
Hi,
I am looking at the apidoc:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/root_admin/createServiceOffering.html
Is there a way to define a compute service offering per public zone ?
It seems that if you have multiple public zones, a service offering will be
created in all zones ?
I am
All,
Thanks for the suggestions and help. I'll try out what Prasanna suggested
and let you know.
Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:08:11AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:58:52PM +, Mathias Mullins wrote:
> Was trying to help a non-bias party. :-)
Yup, and we appreciate it Matt.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:26:12AM +0200, France wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> during recent problems creating my own Ubuntu 12.04 LTS PV template
> to work on CS 4.1.1. with XS 6.0.2, i got the idea, that it would be
> nice, if i could share my templates with the world. I would also
> like to get new ones
Ah, Thanks for clarifying Chip, wasn't super clear in the by-laws the way
they are written. So I wasn't sure how to write it.
I totally agree with you that all votes are important, the only reason I
focused on the PMC votes is because we seemed to be getting completely off
base about getting the r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14061/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository: cloudstack-gi
Some videos have started appearing on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLb899uhkHRoaK3MYBdi5Vt7wQWY4V14y-
Thanks for the uploads
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 07:37:18AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Heya,
>
> Right now I'm focusing on getting the new website for the November conference
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14060/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository: cloudstack-gi
Hi all,
during recent problems creating my own Ubuntu 12.04 LTS PV template to
work on CS 4.1.1. with XS 6.0.2, i got the idea, that it would be nice,
if i could share my templates with the world. I would also like to get
new ones for free. So before i go and create my own public free template
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review26016
---
Commit 28af817fcc835c10e4a21f08e971041325ad206d in branch refs/heads
74 matches
Mail list logo
