All, Thanks for the suggestions and help. I'll try out what Prasanna suggested and let you know.
Thanks! On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:08:11AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > The current implementation of simulator has its own limitation: the > > > simulator itself is a separate hypervisor type, thus a lot of condition > > > checks against hypervisor type in mgt server will fail if simulator is > used. > > > For example, currently, the zone wide primary storage only works for > > > vmware and kvm, so if you add a zone wide primary storage into a zone > which > > > only has simulator as hypervisor, then you can't use that zone wide > primary > > > storage at all. > > > The simulator should be able to simulate any other hypervisors, maybe > > > fixed in 4.3? > > > > Some of this dependency on the hypervisor is unavoidable but will keep > improving as the architecture allows it. OTOH, Zone-Wide primary storage > should be easy to add to the simulator, I'll look into that. > > > Yeah, that's probably the best way to fix this up. Being able to have the > > simulator "emulate" another HV for the orchestration logic would be good. > > OTOH, I don't think we want to make this overly complex... > > > The original problem posed by David about the NPE comes because of a > config check from the `hypervisor_capabilities` table, if you include > a row for the simulator similar to the other hypervisors then you > should be able to get past the NPE. > -- > Prasanna., > > ------------------------ > Powered by BigRock.com > > > -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315
