Yep, I agree it's a tight schedule. Whether or not that's a good idea is
beside the point, I suppose.

I also agree some last-minute changes will come in. I was simply pointing
out that I have never encountered over 200 fixes coming into a release in
the final couple weeks. On a project where regression tests (hopefully
almost all automated) cover most all of the system, I expect such a high
number of last-minute changes would be OK.

That being said, the schedules for projects I've been involved in prior to
CloudStack have been more on the order of 6 - 12 months, where QA has
literally months to perform regression testing and bug fixes trickle in
very slowly during that time frame.

Since this is a different environment and I am not all that familiar with
how we churn out releases, I decided not to vote because I - like Daan - do
not have a good feel for the overall quality of the release.

Thanks


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:

> The process is laid out. There's exactly 2 months of testing/bug fixing.
> Given that schedule it isn't unreasonable that there are last minute
> fixes.
> Since the release manager is not an expert on any one feature,
> he/she cannot judge which fixes should/shouldn't make it into the release.
>
> The RM only has the list of open bugs and the RC date to make a decision!
>
> The voting requirements aren't as onerous, I hope all committers have read
> this:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/-oTlAQ
>
>
>
> On 9/10/13 1:55 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Sebastien,
> >
> >Personally I felt like I just didn't yet understand our testing/QA process
> >enough to know if 4.2 was ready or not.
> >
> >I did voice concerns over the past few weeks regarding the number of
> >checkins that took place right before a RC was built (since I have never
> >on
> >any product I've worked on in the past 15 years experienced such a high
> >volume of fixes so late in the game).
> >
> >People did chime in both in agreement and also to try to soothe my
> >concerns.
> >
> >In the end, I just wanted to wait and see how this process plays out, so I
> >didn't feel I should cast a vote.
> >
> >I hope that clarifies my thinking here.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
> ><run...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the 4.2 release.
> >>
> >> On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> >> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
> >> indicated with a "*" next to their name:
> >> >
> >> > +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove
> >> Ewerlid
> >> > -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller
> >> >
> >>
> >> FWIW, I am very disappointed by this vote. The result does not matter,
> >>the
> >> number of people voting is worrisome to me.
> >>
> >> We have over ~70 apache committers on CloudStack, why didn't people
> >>vote ?
> >>
> >> -sebastien
> >>
> >> > I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution
> >>repo
> >> now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks
> >> >
> >> > The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is
> >> available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for
> >>4.2.1.
> >> If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with
> >> commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be
> >> release noted.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Animesh
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >*Mike Tutkowski*
> >*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >o: 303.746.7302
> >Advancing the way the world uses the
> >cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >* *
>
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to