Yep, I agree it's a tight schedule. Whether or not that's a good idea is beside the point, I suppose.
I also agree some last-minute changes will come in. I was simply pointing out that I have never encountered over 200 fixes coming into a release in the final couple weeks. On a project where regression tests (hopefully almost all automated) cover most all of the system, I expect such a high number of last-minute changes would be OK. That being said, the schedules for projects I've been involved in prior to CloudStack have been more on the order of 6 - 12 months, where QA has literally months to perform regression testing and bug fixes trickle in very slowly during that time frame. Since this is a different environment and I am not all that familiar with how we churn out releases, I decided not to vote because I - like Daan - do not have a good feel for the overall quality of the release. Thanks On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > The process is laid out. There's exactly 2 months of testing/bug fixing. > Given that schedule it isn't unreasonable that there are last minute > fixes. > Since the release manager is not an expert on any one feature, > he/she cannot judge which fixes should/shouldn't make it into the release. > > The RM only has the list of open bugs and the RC date to make a decision! > > The voting requirements aren't as onerous, I hope all committers have read > this: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/-oTlAQ > > > > On 9/10/13 1:55 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > >Hi Sebastien, > > > >Personally I felt like I just didn't yet understand our testing/QA process > >enough to know if 4.2 was ready or not. > > > >I did voice concerns over the past few weeks regarding the number of > >checkins that took place right before a RC was built (since I have never > >on > >any product I've worked on in the past 15 years experienced such a high > >volume of fixes so late in the game). > > > >People did chime in both in agreement and also to try to soothe my > >concerns. > > > >In the end, I just wanted to wait and see how this process plays out, so I > >didn't feel I should cast a vote. > > > >I hope that clarifies my thinking here. > > > >Thanks > > > > > >On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > ><run...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> I am changing the subject of the [RESULTS] thread for the 4.2 release. > >> > >> On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > >> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes > >> indicated with a "*" next to their name: > >> > > >> > +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove > >> Ewerlid > >> > -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller > >> > > >> > >> FWIW, I am very disappointed by this vote. The result does not matter, > >>the > >> number of people voting is worrisome to me. > >> > >> We have over ~70 apache committers on CloudStack, why didn't people > >>vote ? > >> > >> -sebastien > >> > >> > I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution > >>repo > >> now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks > >> > > >> > The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is > >> available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for > >>4.2.1. > >> If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with > >> commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be > >> release noted. > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Animesh > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >*Mike Tutkowski* > >*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > >e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > >o: 303.746.7302 > >Advancing the way the world uses the > >cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > >* * > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*