I agree that this should be a separate project, so that this can be used by
other databases written in rust, not only datafusion. Let's start with an
implementation by binding with gandiva, and build pure rust implementation
later.
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:28 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> Hi Renjie,
Hi Renjie,
I have not started on this but I would be interested in helping you with
it.
At a high level I think there are two main parts to this work:
1. Translating DataFusion expressions to Gandiva protobuf
2. Implementing the code to make the native C call to Gandiva
I could help with #1 pre
Hi:
@Andy Grove Are you developing this? I'm interested
in this and want to join development.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:18 PM Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Agree with Wes, the protobuf based interface should be the language neutral
> way to build expressions with Gandiva.
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:3
Agree with Wes, the protobuf based interface should be the language neutral
way to build expressions with Gandiva.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:30 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> This makes sense to me know that I understand a little more about Gandiva.
> This also fits well with my proposal to donate DataFu
This makes sense to me know that I understand a little more about Gandiva.
This also fits well with my proposal to donate DataFusion in the other
thread. DataFusion can manage the overall logical query plan in Rust and
potentially delegate some subset of expression evaluation to Gandiva via
protobu
Gandiva supports a Protobuf-based interface -- this is how Java
interacts with it via JNI. Rust could do the same -- that would
probably be easier than wrapping the C++ class structure. It would
also help drive new feature requirements in the serialized
projection/filter expression trees
- Wes
On
I'm not sure, that a binding is a good idea. Both Arrow and Parquet
already have their own rust implementation, and a interfacing with
cpp isn't as easy and straightforward than it is with C. Otherwise
We could simply just maintain bindings for all of the cpp libraries,
rather than of having a hybr
t; experienced with C++/cmake.
>
> P
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> From: Andy Grove
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 9:39 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Rust bindings for Gandiva
>
> Now that the Rust i
gandiva
on windows? I’m willing to help where I can but I’m not very experienced with
C++/cmake.
P
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Andy Grove
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 9:39 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Rust bindings for Gandiv
Now that the Rust implementation of Arrow is maturing, I'm interested in
having bindings for Gandiva for query execution, rather than duplicating
this in Rust.
I will likely start looking at this soon but wanted to see if anyone else
here is particularly interested in this area of functionality?
; >> production-ready to go into the master branch.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Andy Grove > (mailto:andygrov...@gmail.com)>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >
t; > >> interested
> > >> > in a native Rust implementation but it should be possible to have
> traits
> > >> > defining the interface and two implementations - one native and one
> using
> > >> > FFI to call C. Rust has zero overhead when ca
gt; about how complete it is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think it is better for people to see it in the arrow repo being
> >> >> actively
> >> >> > developed. I'm very interested in getting compatibility unit tests
> >> set up
>
t; > clearance procedure harder with more individual contributors involved?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Andy.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Wes McKinney
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
ually make the
> IP
> > clearance procedure harder with more individual contributors involved?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Wes McKinney
> wrote:
> >
> >> Not knowing the Ru
al contributors involved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>
>> Not knowing the Rust ecosystem very well, I'm interested in the
>> pros/cons of building and maintaining Rust bindings vs. a native Rust
>>
, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> Not knowing the Rust ecosystem very well, I'm interested in the
> pros/cons of building and maintaining Rust bindings vs. a native Rust
> implementation, or some hybrid of the two. Seems like both bindings
> and native implementatio
Not knowing the Rust ecosystem very well, I'm interested in the
pros/cons of building and maintaining Rust bindings vs. a native Rust
implementation, or some hybrid of the two. Seems like both bindings
and native implementation could be part of the same codebase
potentially.
If we deci
t;
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> _
> From: Andy Grove
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 9:08 AM
> Subject: Rust bindings
> To:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Congratulations on the release of the Go bindings for Arrow. I think Rust
> should be
Hi Andy/Paddy,
I also want to get involved in contributing towards rust bindings.
Request you to please add me also.
Regards,
Tarush
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 at 8:14 PM, paddy horan wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I’m looking to get involved in contributing to the Rust implementation
> also, w
iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
_
From: Andy Grove
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 9:08 AM
Subject: Rust bindings
To:
Hi,
Congratulations on the release of the Go bindings for Arrow. I think Rust
should be next ;-)
I've been a bit distracted getting a release out
ekend on this. I don't think it
will be very hard to get to a point where I am at least using the Array
type.
I can commit to working on the Rust bindings moving forward (weekends
mostly) so I think we should go ahead and do this under the arrow repo if
everyone is in agreement.
Thanks,
Andy,
Joshua Howard created ARROW-2267:
Summary: Rust bindings
Key: ARROW-2267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2267
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: New Feature
23 matches
Mail list logo
