Gandiva supports a Protobuf-based interface -- this is how Java interacts with it via JNI. Rust could do the same -- that would probably be easier than wrapping the C++ class structure. It would also help drive new feature requirements in the serialized projection/filter expression trees
- Wes On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:22 AM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure, that a binding is a good idea. Both Arrow and Parquet > already have their own rust implementation, and a interfacing with > cpp isn't as easy and straightforward than it is with C. Otherwise > We could simply just maintain bindings for all of the cpp libraries, > rather than of having a hybrid solution. > > While We could spare the reimplementation of gandiva, it'd make > packaging more complicated and rust development way less > welcoming to new contributors. > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:39 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now that the Rust implementation of Arrow is maturing, I'm interested in > > having bindings for Gandiva for query execution, rather than duplicating > > this in Rust. > > > > I will likely start looking at this soon but wanted to see if anyone else > > here is particularly interested in this area of functionality? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andy. > >
