My personal view (and I think I've seen others state this already here) is that we should bring it into the repo sooner rather than later and work on it there. The version is 0.1.0 so I think that sets peoples expectations about how complete it is.
I think it is better for people to see it in the arrow repo being actively developed. I'm very interested in getting compatibility unit tests set up soon too so we can be sure it really is compatible with the other implementations. Andy. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, paddy horan <paddyho...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I’m looking to get involved in contributing to the Rust implementation > also, would love to see it in the arrow repo sooner rather than later. > > Should we identify what needs to be added to iron-Arrow before it’s ready > to be donated to the Apache repo? > > > Thanks, > Paddy > > Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > _____________________________ > From: Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 9:08 AM > Subject: Rust bindings > To: <dev@arrow.apache.org> > > > Hi, > > Congratulations on the release of the Go bindings for Arrow. I think Rust > should be next ;-) > > I've been a bit distracted getting a release out in the day job but am now > working on iron-arrow and getting it ready to integrate with my project. I > hope to be able to put some time in this weekend on this. I don't think it > will be very hard to get to a point where I am at least using the Array > type. > > I can commit to working on the Rust bindings moving forward (weekends > mostly) so I think we should go ahead and do this under the arrow repo if > everyone is in agreement. > > Thanks, > > Andy, > > >
