Hi: @Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> Are you developing this? I'm interested in this and want to join development.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:18 PM Praveen Kumar <prav...@dremio.com> wrote: > Agree with Wes, the protobuf based interface should be the language neutral > way to build expressions with Gandiva. > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:30 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This makes sense to me know that I understand a little more about > Gandiva. > > This also fits well with my proposal to donate DataFusion in the other > > thread. DataFusion can manage the overall logical query plan in Rust and > > potentially delegate some subset of expression evaluation to Gandiva via > > protobuf. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andy. > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:51 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Gandiva supports a Protobuf-based interface -- this is how Java > > > interacts with it via JNI. Rust could do the same -- that would > > > probably be easier than wrapping the C++ class structure. It would > > > also help drive new feature requirements in the serialized > > > projection/filter expression trees > > > > > > - Wes > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:22 AM Krisztián Szűcs > > > <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm not sure, that a binding is a good idea. Both Arrow and Parquet > > > > already have their own rust implementation, and a interfacing with > > > > cpp isn't as easy and straightforward than it is with C. Otherwise > > > > We could simply just maintain bindings for all of the cpp libraries, > > > > rather than of having a hybrid solution. > > > > > > > > While We could spare the reimplementation of gandiva, it'd make > > > > packaging more complicated and rust development way less > > > > welcoming to new contributors. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:39 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Now that the Rust implementation of Arrow is maturing, I'm > interested > > > in > > > > > having bindings for Gandiva for query execution, rather than > > > duplicating > > > > > this in Rust. > > > > > > > > > > I will likely start looking at this soon but wanted to see if > anyone > > > else > > > > > here is particularly interested in this area of functionality? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > > > > -- Renjie Liu Software Engineer, MVAD
