Hi everyone,
The Arrow PMC is pleased to announce Apache Arrow Summit 25 !
The event will be in person, on Oct 2nd, in Paris (hosted by
https://pydata.org/paris2025).
The Arrow Summit focuses on gathering and building the community
around Apache Arrow and his ecosystem. It will be a great opport
Hi Matt
Thanks for the proposal.
I will take a deeper look at the proposal document. At first glance,
I'm more in favor to use env variables because it's super easy, easy
to use with K8S ConfigMap and outside, and also we can always imagine
populate these env variables in a driver manager (just m
Hi,
Thanks everyone for your feedback and help!
I'm closing the call for volunteers now. I will aggregate all
volunteers on a list for the Arrow PMC members.
They will make their choice.
Thanks again !
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>
Hi everyone,
The call for volunteers will be closed by the end of the week.
Thanks!
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 1:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Arrow PMC is pleased to announce Arrow Summit 25.
>
> The Arrow Summit 2025 is a community eve
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 2:49 PM Gang Wu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of
> Apache Arrow Java version 18.3.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 8e84e4c8bbe041f362690e4ea54280ec682dbb1f [1]
>
> The source
ntoine Pitrou ()
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi JB,
> > > >
> > > > I'm volunteer too.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Antoine.
> > > >
> > &
Hi everyone,
The Arrow PMC is pleased to announce Arrow Summit 25.
The Arrow Summit 2025 is a community event, organised by a Selection Committee.
The event’s focus is to build community around the Apache Arrow Open
Source Project and ecosystem (related projects), as well as providing
content for
t; > > Gang Wu schrieb am So., 20. Apr. 2025, 10:04:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is not in a hurry, I'd like to be the release manager to go
> > > > through
> > > > > the release process.
ore I’d like to follow semver if possible
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025, at 14:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I propose to submit a new Arrow Java release to vote.
> >
> > As discussed previously, I would like to propose a regular r
Hi folks,
I propose to submit a new Arrow Java release to vote.
As discussed previously, I would like to propose a regular release
pace for Arrow Java.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
+1
Do we want to enable Discussions and Projects on other Arrow repos too
(e.g. arrow-java, etc) ?
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:05 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that we can enable GitHub Discussions by .asf.yaml:
>
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/ma
Congrats Jacob !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:23 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Arrow has invited
> Jacob Wujciak to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce
> that Jacob Wujciak has accepted.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
>
Hi folks,
Regarding our activity on the project and the adoption of Apache
Arrow, I would like to start a discussion about an Apache Arrow
Meetup, gathering contributors, users and enthusiasts about Arrow
generally speaking.
The idea is to have a community event, where a Selection Committee
(sele
> > filenames on a one-per-object-file basis.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure whether there is a similar tool for macOS or not...
> > >
> > > We can use .pdb on Windows. We can install .pdb something
> > > like the following:
> > &
Hi folks,
sorry, I missed the meeting, I will attend the next one.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:08 AM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is this Wednesday 12 March 16:00
> UTC / 12:00 EDT / 9:00 PDT.
>
> *** For attendees in countries that have not yet switche
Thanks everyone for your warm welcome !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 7:03 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré has accepted an invitation to become a
> committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome,
Hi Andrew
That's good to know ! Thanks for the info !
I think we have several contacts in Europe/France we can also leverage.
Let me prepare a quick first draft to share with the community.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 2:07 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> This is great.
>
> In case it
Hi folks,
I discussed on Zulip with some of you about that, but I would like to
bring the discussion on the dev mailing list to get the whole
community involved.
I propose to add DEBUG symbols to Arrow Java JNI and release/provide
the corresponding artifacts (with specific Maven classifier).
Tod
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:00 PM Matt Topol wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of
> Apache Arrow Go version 18.2.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> 46bc47cf6cd791ab9c6e66961517bbdcda7078d9 [1]
>
> The sourc
ofit Pioneers Hub. The
> only co-hosting opportunity I see this year is PyConDE in Darmstadt. Sadly,
> this is already happening in 6 weeks and probably on too short notice.
>
> Best
> Uwe
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2025, at 3:48 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Andrew
> &
t; >>>
> >>> V V čet., 6. mar. 2025 ob 17:31 je oseba Raúl Cumplido <
> >>> rau...@apache.org>
> >>> napisala:
> >>>
> >>> > +1, sounds like a great idea. I would definitely attend!
> >>> >
> >&g
the more expensive).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 06/03/2025 à 15:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Regarding our activity on the project and the adoption of Apache
> > Arrow, I would like to start a discussion about an Apac
+1 (non binding)
- hash and checksum are good
- LICENSE is good, even if I would separate the pure LICENSE for the
source distribution (code copy) from the LICENSE for binary
distribution (about statically linked deps)
- NOTICE for source distribution looks good, but it's not valid for
binary dist
As there's no objection so far, I will prepare the corresponding PRs.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:25 PM Gang Wu wrote:
>
> A quarterly schedule sounds good. Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 8:23 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote
19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Following the first 18.2.0 release on arrow-java repository, I would
> > like to start a discussion about having regular pace on Arrow Java
> > releases.
> >
> > In order to give visibility to our communi
Hi folks,
Following the first 18.2.0 release on arrow-java repository, I would
like to start a discussion about having regular pace on Arrow Java
releases.
In order to give visibility to our community, I propose to have a
regular pace in Arrow Java releases: at least one release per quarter.
I p
The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the Arrow Java 18.2.0 release.
It's the first release since the "move" to the arrow-java repository.
The release is available now from our website:
https://arrow.apache.org/install/
and
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/arrow/apache-a
+1 (non binding)
Checked the source distribution (hash/checksum, no binary, asf header,
license/notice) and tested (build/run) on MacOS M1.
Thanks
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 à 03:23, Bryce Mecum a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache
>
Hi Ian
I will do my best to join (no guarantee :) ).
Thanks for the reminder !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 6:05 PM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is this Wednesday 12 February
> 17:00 UTC / 12:00 EST / 9:00 PST.
>
> Zoom meeting URL:
> https://zoom.us/j/87
Hi folks,
This vote passed with 4 +1 bindings votes and 1 +1 non binding vote.
I’m moving forward on finalizing the release.
Thanks everyone for your vote !
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 6 févr. 2025 à 08:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the followin
+1 (non binding)
- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (I identified a few cleanups, but not blocker)
- Tested on MacOS M1
- Hash and checksum are OK
- No binary found in the source distribution
- ASF header present in all expected file
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:21 PM Jean-Baptiste
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC5) of
Apache Arrow Java version 18.2.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
a5b86049261530d41fbbdd23324420f0c1d14431 [1]
The source release rc5 is hosted at [2].
Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
e
> independent release schedules.
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2025, at 15:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Bryce,
> >
> > I'm doing a pass on arrow-java (fixing some "legal" issues).
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 a
Hi Bryce,
I'm doing a pass on arrow-java (fixing some "legal" issues).
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:05 PM Bryce Mecum wrote:
>
> Just an update: The 19.0.1 milestone can now be considered frozen with 8
> total issues. Thanks everyone for the help flagging extra issues to go into
> th
Congrats Laurent !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:34 AM David Li wrote:
>
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Laurent Goujon has
> accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome, and
> thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> David
Congrats Adam
Regards
JB
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:30 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
> has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> kou
>
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for proposing this Andrew (and sorry for the late reply).
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:16 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As we have discussed[1] we propose to change the default branch from
> `master` to `main` in the https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs reposit
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:25 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache
> Arrow version 18.0.0. This is a release consisting of 327
> resolved GitHub issues[1].
>
> This release candidate is based on co
Hi everyone,
I did a sync-up with James about the Arrow Flight ODBC driver PR
(https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40939).
Here's the main takeaways:
1. To actually package and distribute the ODBC driver, we need
something like warpdrive to package and interface the driver. As
warpdrive is a LG
gt; Le 10/09/2024 à 09:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I came to this PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43697
> >
> > For the background, before this PR, the client can send any header
> > size whereas the server only accepted 2Kb
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:56 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache
> Arrow version 17.0.0. This is a release consisting of 321
> resolved GitHub issues[1].
>
> This release candidate is based on co
t, some data:
> > > >
> > > >- Oracle 11: support until January 2032 (extended fee has been
> > waived)
> > > >- Cornetto 11: September 2027
> > > >- Adoptium 11: At least Oct 2027
> > > >- Zulu 11: Jan 2032
> > > >-
+1 (non binding)
Testing on MacOS M2.
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:00 AM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC4) of Apache Arrow
> ADBC version 12. This is a release consisting of 56 resolved GitHub issues
> [1].
>
> Please note tha
+1 (non binding)
Quickly checked on arm arch.
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 9 mai 2024 à 15:04, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache
> Arrow version 16.1.0. This is a release consisting of 35
> resolved GitHub issues[1].
>
> This releas
gt; > > >> is the baseline supported version.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Martin.
> > > >>
> > > >> - In case anyone is curious why we don’t support Java 8 per our own
> > > >> policy, it’s
following days) and that could help with
> the custom maven plugin (although to be honest, I'm still wondering the
> value of Arrow being JPMS compatible whereas other projects are not)
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 6:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > Hi Dane,
> &g
. From a maintenance perspective, it would be nice to
> drop both.
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:20 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I think it's time to drop JDK8 support. I would say that we should
> > keep Java11 (jumping directly to Ja
Thanks Raúl ! It makes sense in terms of timing.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:41 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Due to unexpected issues (my computer died) I'll move the feature freeze to
> early next week.
>
> Thanks
> Raúl
>
>
> El jue, 18 abr 2024, 17:01, Raúl Cumplido escribió:
>
> > H
Hi
I think it's time to drop JDK8 support. I would say that we should
keep Java11 (jumping directly to Java17 would be problematic
potentially for some users I guess).
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:21 PM James Duong
wrote:
>
> If we dropped JDK 8, we could use the JDK to compile module-
Something that I do on releases is to count the binding/non binding
vote in the result email (to have a clear result).
Something like:
"The vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): foo, bar
+1 (non binding): other, other
No other vote.
"
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:54 AM Su
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- hash and signature are OK
- ASF header are there
- no binary found in source distribution
- build ok
I run Java and C++ tests on MacOS, all good.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:01 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the foll
Hi
Yeah it’s better to state the vote as binding or non binding.
It simplifies the count ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
Le jeu. 18 avr. 2024 à 01:54, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for confusing by me... My country (Japan) uses
> "${FAMILY_NAME} ${FIRST_NAME}" order for name. I found a
> recom
look at the example code, and provide any and all feedback they can. The
> > biggest thing that this protocol needs is real world usage that we can
> > utilize to improve and update this protocol based on use-cases.
> >
> > --Matt
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8
Hi folks,
I will be there.
@Dewey, thanks for running the meeting :)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:23 PM Dewey Dunnington
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> I'll be attending and I'm happy to run the meeting.
>
> Cheers!
>
> -dewey
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:41 PM Ian Cook wrote:
> >
> > Our nex
Hi Matt,
Sorry, I'm late on this vote and in the doc review.
I like the idea. Thanks for the very detailed document.
Just curious, what's the next step (if I can help in any way :) ) ?
Regards
JB
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:35 PM Matt Topol wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to propose a vote for
independent and
> fully-featured implementations in Go, Rust, etc. But that is just a matter of
> wording.
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, at 17:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yeah, to be honest, I was more focused on Java versioning.
> >
> >
Hi,
Yeah, to be honest, I was more focused on Java versioning.
Maybe, we can "group" Arrow components in two major areas: the "core"
libs and the components using the "core" libs.
C++ can have its own versioning, and the rest is decoupled from each
other but it will depend to C++ release.
I thin
Hi,
I agree with Jacob's proposal, and also share the concern with Kou.
IMHO, it would be great to have several potential release managers. On
some other Apache projects, we had a kind of release bottleneck with a
very limited number of release managers. Maybe it would be interesting
to have revie
+1 (non binding)
It sounds good to me. Maybe with to update documentation ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1:01 PM Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose a change to the ADBC specification that introduces
> 5 new standard info codes and formalizes 3 existing opt
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 10:37 AM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight
> SQL [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL
> server to create or append to a table, without
t
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > Hi Laurent
> >
> > It makes sense to me. I started this "move" (on the plugin side of the
> > thing) as part of the reproducible build effort.
> >
> > At code level, I thi
verify on the release process impact/package
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> new update about the donation. From a legal and "layout" perspective,
> I have something clean to propose as a PR.
> I'
Hi Laurent
It makes sense to me. I started this "move" (on the plugin side of the
thing) as part of the reproducible build effort.
At code level, I think it would be great to leverage some features
from Java 17+ (I'm thinking about record, memory API, etc).
I would be more than happy to help on t
+1 (non binding)
- Hashed and signatures are OK
- ASF headers are present on expected file
- No binary file found in the source distribution
- Checked on MacOS M3
Regards
JB
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 12:07 AM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> Subject: [VOTE][RUST][DataFusion] Release Apache Arrow DataFusion 3
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache Arrow
> ADBC version 0.11.0. This is a release consisting of 36 resolved GitHub
> issues [1].
>
> This release candidate is based o
Unfortunately, I won't be able to join today due to conflict with the
Iceberg Community meeting.
I will join the next one.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:32 PM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> Our next biweekly Arrow community meeting is tomorrow at 16:00 UTC / 12:00
> EDT.
>
> *** For attendees in co
+1
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:48 AM Adam C wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose a change to the FlightSQL specification as
> originally described in this Github issue [1] by Andrew Lamb. The
> specification change would allow servers to support prepared
> statements with para
+1 (non binding)
Quickly checked on MacOS M3.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 8:40 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
> version 51.0.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> ada986c7ec8f8fe4f94235c8aae
+1 (non binding)
Quickly checked on MacOS M3.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:22 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC3) of Apache
> Arrow version 15.0.2. This is a release consisting of 8
> resolved GitHub issues[1].
>
> This rele
Hi Raúl
Thanks for the update. I do my best to tentatively include odbc driver
in this release (not blocker).
I have a list of PRs I would like to include, I will do a pass
tomorrow to give us time for changes :)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:59 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- signature and hashes look good
- build OK
- ASF headers present
- No problematic binaries found in the source distribution
- Tested on MacOS M3
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:33 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As we have discussed[1][2] I would like to vote on the proposal to
> create a new Apache Top Level Project for DataFusion. The text of the
> proposed resolution and background document is copy/pasted be
posted asap.
Sorry again for the delay :/
Regards
JB
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:13 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> A quick update about the ODBC driver donation:
> - I finished all required changes (ASF header everywhere, build update, etc)
> - I'm now on
+1 (non binding)
I quickly tested on MacOS arm64.
Regards
JB
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 9:47 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache Arrow
> ADBC version 0.10.0. This is a release consisting of 30 resolved GitHub
> issues [1].
>
>
t; On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 1:15 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> A quick update about the ODBC driver donation:
>> - I finished all required changes (ASF header everywhere, build update, etc)
>> - I'm now on build & runtime test
+1
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:38 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Paul Nienaber would like to propose explicit session management for Flight
> RPC. This proposal was previously discussed at [1]. A candidate
> implementation for C++ and Java is at [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 7
t;
> Ian
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Thanks ! I will join the Iceberg Community Meeting today as I have some WIP.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024
rent meeting
> time.
>
> Ian
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 4:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian
> >
> > Thanks for sharing.
> >
> > By the way, we have a Community Meeting time conflict between Apache
> > Iceberg and Apache Arr
Hi Ian
Thanks for sharing.
By the way, we have a Community Meeting time conflict between Apache
Iceberg and Apache Arrow.
Do you think it would be possible (in the future) to have the Arrow
Community Meeting one hour earlier or later ?
If not possible, not a problem, I will alternatively attend
By the way, there's a community meeting conflict between Apache Arrow
and Apache Iceberg :)
Maybe we could move the Arrow Community meeting one hour earlier or later.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:29 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are already several other issues t
It sounds good to me.
+1 for 15.0.1 release.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:29 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are already several other issues tagged as 15.0.1. I can take
> some time to create a patch release and add all those fixes.
> I'll add it to the agenda for to
Hi guys,
A quick update about the ODBC driver donation:
- I finished all required changes (ASF header everywhere, build update, etc)
- I'm now on build & runtime test
I should have the PR open in a couple of days.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 4:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onof
Hi David,
It's reasonable. I think we can start with your initial proposal (it
sounds fine to me) and we can always improve step by step.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:53 PM David Li wrote:
>
> I'm going to keep the proposal as-is then. It can be extended if this use
> case com
Hi Matt
Thanks for sharing. It looks interesting and I like the idea.
Let me review the document and eventually add comments.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:22 AM Matt Topol wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> In my current work I've been experimenting and playing around with
> utilizing Ar
Hi all,
FYI, I'm back on Arrow (sorry I have been busy with other stuff).
I'm working on the ODBC donation branch, I should have the PR ready by
the end of the week.
Sorry again for the delay, it's now one of my top priority ;)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:45 PM Alina Li wrote:
>
> Da
+1 (non binding)
Testing on MacOS
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:10 PM Ben Baumgold wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> Apache Arrow Julia version 2.7.1.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> ac199b0e377502ea0f1fa5ced7f
>
> Are you using node 21? It seems related to this issue:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39499
>
> Kind regards,
> Raul
>
> El mié, 17 ene 2024, 17:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré escribió:
>
> > +0.5 (non binding)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - hash and s
+0.5 (non binding)
I checked:
- hash and signature look good (NB: I think we can provide only
sha512, no need to provide sha256 anymore imho)
- no binary files found in the source distribution (py/pxd files are OK)
- few files don't have or not correct ASF headers (for instance in cpp
and r module
. Once I see the PR to apache/arrow with the license
> headers attached, I will start the incubator vote to finalize this.
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024, at 01:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Correct.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8
Hi Andy
Thanks for creating the issue. I will help with that.
Regards
JB
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 8:02 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> It was recently brought to the attention of the Arrow PMC that some of our
> documentation and other web content is not fully compliant with the ASF
> branding policy.
Correct.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:02 PM David Li wrote:
>
> My understanding is that if the employment contract for all developers
> involved stated that Dremio holds the rights, then only Dremio needs to grant
> rights to the ASF. Laurent pointed out that this is how Gandiva was do
ed
>
> Andrew
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-219
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 7:55 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I did a quick review on the doc and it looks good to me. I just added
> > a question about nam
Hi
I can also help on the PR for code donation (checking some legal
aspects at the meantime).
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:42 PM David Li wrote:
>
> (Apologies if this gets delivered twice; I used the wrong email the first
> time around and I _think_ it didn't send as a result.
Hi Andrew,
I did a quick review on the doc and it looks good to me. I just added
a question about name search (DataFusion will probably work as TLP,
but we have to check as we have a new Apache name moving from Arrow
DataFusion to DataFusion).
Please let me know if I can help on that.
Thanks !
R
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- LICENSE is OK but maybe worth to keep only LICENSE.txt at root level
and move license.tpl in dev folder (I can propose a PR about that)
- NOTICE.txt looks a big short, we should mention Included Software /
Used Software. I will do a more detailed pass. Definitely not
Hi Raúl
Thanks for the update. Don't hesitate to ping me if I can help in any way.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:37 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to share the current plan for the next major Release of
> Apache Arrow.
>
> The code freeze for 15.0.0 is currently schedu
Ack, I will be there.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:37 PM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> Our first biweekly Arrow community meeting of 2024 is tomorrow at 17:00
> UTC / 12:00 EDT.
>
> Zoom meeting URL:
> https://zoom.us/j/87649033008?pwd=SitsRHluQStlREM0TjJVYkRibVZsUT09
> Meeting ID: 876 4903 3008
>
Sorry I was swamped in another meeting.
I will participate to the next one.
Regards
JB
Le mer. 20 déc. 2023 à 14:45, Ian Cook a écrit :
> Our last biweekly Arrow community meeting of 2023 is today at 17:00
> UTC / 12:00 EDT.
>
> Zoom meeting URL:
> https://zoom.us/j/87649033008?pwd=SitsRHluQSt
Hi
Arrow should be used (not arrow-pmc).
Regards
JB
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 6:38 PM Alina Li wrote:
>
> Thanks for the confirmation, David. So, the only optional field they need to
> fill in on the ICLA form is the notify project field, and they need to put
> "arrow-pmc" in it?
company project.
For code made by individuals, we need an ICLA for each contributor.
Let me know if I can help on this.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Actually, we would need both: CCLA + IP approval from all original
> contributor
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
