Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.2 Ready for Distribution

+1, for the release and for Magesh On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 10:41 AM, Magesh Umasankar wrote: Hi, I have packaged a 1.5.2 release candidate and placed it at: http://jakarta.apache.org/~umagesh/builds/apache-ant/release/v1.5.2/ bin/ Please download it and test it out. Unless you find any

Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant

On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: how about an ant sandbox? +1

Re: 1.5.3?

+1 - the issue is serious enough to warrant it. I haven't looked into the issue, but the report seemed to indicate a regression bug. On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 03:02 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, as I feared, the zip refactorings have introduced a (at least one) nasty bug. I think 17648 i

Re: subant

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 05:48 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: ps, xdocs: I see we dont get mail when xdocs goes down:- http://nagoya.apache.org/~rubys/gump/ant-xdocs-proposal.html We originally got e-mailed... what happened? In this case, what it appears to be is where logic was added to the ma

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

+1 On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and user lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone is free to vote but only committer votes are binding. Ant 1.6 will require JDK 1.2 to compile and build.

Re: Dynamic Configurator

On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Brett Wooldridge wrote: Further, mywrapper is being used inside of a parallel task (it may not matter, but I'm trying to provide all data). Wow, quite a complex scenario you have there - using real Ant tasks as nested elements *and* w

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Ant 1.5.3

+1 - I somehow missed the original message, sorry. On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose this vote for the Ant 1.5.3 release plan: Mon 24-March-2003 I will build Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 The primary purpose of this release is to correct a f

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

As Dominique mentioned, what the Ant developers typically try to do these days is push back on 3rd party integration built into Ant and let these custom tasks live with the project they support. It would be easier for maintenance for us committers, since none of (probably) use Artima SuiteRunn

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Nathaniel Spurling wrote: Regarding suiterunner vs JUnit, I prefer the suiterunner API: test methods can throw Exceptions, also assertion failures generate Exceptions so you can put one catch(Exception) at the bottom of your method and print out a

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Chris Reeves wrote: Erik - How do you set it up to run a single test on demand? Like this: http://www.ehatchersolutions.com/JavaDevWithAnt/junit.html

Re: Call for defaults.properties maintanance...

On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: that reminds me, we need a way in xdocs of telling xdoclet to not list tasks, else it pulls in these intermediate classes too. This is already part of it. @ant.task ignore="true" Erik

Fwd: [Xdoclet-user] multiple jsptaglib nested tag in webdoclet

because there is no way this has slipped through as a bug - I really cant beleive that. So I am stuck as to what else to try. Can someone describe their setup, or give the list of instructions they use for using XDoclet? -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Xdoclet-user] multiple jsptaglib nested tag in webdoclet

Stefan, Thanks for those details. Erik On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 01:41 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any ideas on the differences between using under project or under a target? Several, and they vary with the Ant version

Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

+1 I simply haven't had the time to get to his xdocs work, so it would be good to have him take care of that stuff himself :) On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 01:13 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: I nominate Jesse Stockall as a committer as he likes spending time fixing up and refactoring some of the neg

Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

On Monday, April 7, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Jesse Stockall wrote: On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 01:13 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: I nominate Jesse Stockall as a committer Cool, so what happens now? We teach you the secret handshake and give you your official membership card that you must present at all

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

+1 On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 09:41 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the Beta. Please indicate your support for this release Here is my +1 Conor - To unsubscrib

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

+1 On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 07:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, Antoine has continuously been sending in patches since months now, he's played an important role in the zip refactoring and is answering more question on the user list than most of us here. Furthermore Antoine has access to

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks image-classdiagram.gif image.html

Jan - thank you for contributing the documentation for . Just the other day I was refreshing my memory on and noticed no documentation existed yet. I was lazy and was going to keep pushing proposal/xdocs so that it would take care of it for us! :) Thanks for beating me to it. Erik

Re: [Patch] cvstagdiff.html

Chris, Thanks for these patches. It would be best if you filed these as attachments to Bugzilla issues. Its especially difficult to apply patches sent via e-mail because of formatting issues with e-mail readers - and its best for our tracking purposes to put them in Bugzilla. Erik On

[VOTE]

I use from ant-contrib a lot. I propose that it be migrated to Ant's HEAD. Objections? +1 Erik

Re: [VOTE]

On Monday, April 21, 2003, at 10:38 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:19 pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: I use from ant-contrib a lot. I propose that it be migrated to Ant's HEAD. Objections? +1 Who is the copyright owner? I think it is up to them to donate the code - we cannot

Re: antlib

On Monday, April 21, 2003, at 05:23 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: I am trying to update the antlib proposal (proposal/sandbox/antlib). Cool stuff... glad you are on board! :) There are the following features in the antlib proposal: 1) antlib & antjar deployment descript

Fwd: Xindice: a final suggestion

FYI. Begin forwarded message: From: Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Apr 22, 2003 1:35:06 PM US/Eastern To: Gump code and data Subject: Xindice: a final suggestion Reply-To: "Gump code and data" As some of you might have noticed, Xindice is failing again, this time on a wick

Re: antlib

On Thursday, April 24, 2003, at 12:39 PM, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: The language was trying to make writing antlibs easier you really only have one basic declaration which defines the elements available to you: every declaration like this, implicitly makes available a new element tag

Re: antlib

On Thursday, April 24, 2003, at 02:23 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: Erik Hatcher wrote: We don't really need to get hung up on the syntax of a descriptor at this stage. Let's get something working in HEAD and work with it. XDoclet can be used to generate these descriptors anyway, and it

Re: antlib

On Thursday, April 24, 2003, at 03:06 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: Erik Hatcher wrote: I think the syntax of the descriptor is pretty important. Obviously I disagree, but ngot terribly strongly. So you believe that anything can go in the XML tags, no design or thinking is needed - because you

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/dvsl task.dvsl

Got patches to the stuff you'd like me to commit on the XDoclet codebase? Nice work (having not run it yet myself, just browsing the commit messages)! Erik On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jesse 2003/04/25 07:09:11 Modified:proposal/xdocs/

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/dvsl task.dvsl

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 10:41 AM, Jesse Stockall wrote: I've checked in a binary in the proposal tree, but Gump wont use it, so I need to get them into XDoclet's CVS tree. How much work wuld be involved in moving the module to Ant's CVS tree? I don't think it would be too much work. It wa

Re: antlib

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 01:25 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: All I ask is to do the changes in the core separately. +1 I'm in agreement with you on the order of events, Costin, 100%. with tasks/datatypes is fair game to migrate into HEAD, then core changes to make the other components work

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/dvsl task.dvsl

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 10:41 AM, Jesse Stockall wrote: On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 10:29, Erik Hatcher wrote: Got patches to the stuff you'd like me to commit on the XDoclet codebase? Yes. I've committed the patches to XDoclet's CVS that you sent to me. Let me know if there ar

Re: antlib

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 01:39 PM, peter reilly wrote: I'm in agreement with you on the order of events, Costin, 100%. with tasks/datatypes is fair game to migrate into HEAD, then with xml or with properties? I don't care. :)) So take that as a +0 on either - for the time being. I think XM

Re: Antlib descriptor

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 01:39 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: New thread. +1 :) However I'm more convinced than ever that the XML should use a subset of ant, and reuse the same processing infrastructure. I.e. not another parser or rules. I'll defer commenting on this until I ponder it more and

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xjavadoc build.xml,1.49,1.50

urday, April 26, 2003, at 03:14 PM, Jesse Stockall wrote: On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 15:04, Erik Hatcher wrote: Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xjavadoc In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv27780 Modified Files: build.xml Log Message: Fix for Gump.

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/lib xjavadoc-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-apache-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-ejb-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-web-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xdoclet-module-1.2b3-dev.jar xdoclet-xjavadoc-uc-1.2b3-dev.jar

Oops... sorry - I should have done this the other day. I had the JAR's in the right directory, just did not commit them. Erik On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 12:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jesse 2003/04/28 09:45:22 Modified:proposal/xdocs/lib xdoclet-1.2b3-dev.jar

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/xdoclet AntXDocletTask.java DatatypeSubTask.java DatatypeTagsHandler.java IndexGen.java

Stefan, On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 03:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + + classname="org.apache.ant.xdoclet.AntDocletTask"> + + + + + Will Gump be ok with this change? I get an eerie feeling that it won't like trying to use

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/xdoclet AntXDocletTask.java DatatypeSubTask.java DatatypeTagsHandler.java IndexGen.java

On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 04:16 PM, Jesse Stockall wrote: Cool, everything seems to be working after the move. Great! *whew* :) Aslak just committed a fix for XJavaDoc so EnumeratedAttributes are being resolved correctly. XJavaDoc still has problems resolving types used in inner classes, but

[GUMP] Build Failure - ant-xdocs-proposal

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details.

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/xdoclet AntXDocletTask.java DatatypeSubTask.java DatatypeTagsHandler.java IndexGen.java

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 02:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: XDoclet needs to have a JAR to look at though, as it needs to get at META-INF/xdoclet.xml I think it will work with directories as well, as long as the directory mirrors the jar file structure. Cool. I've modified the build to do it

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

+1 On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 03:00 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: PMC members, I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site/ anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16 Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. I

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

+1 On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 07:26 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has

Re: [PATCH] Added if and unless checks to JUnit formatters

me I've submitted a patch to Ant, so hopefully I'm going about it the right way. Erik Hatcher suggested I submit this patch on the ant-user mailing list. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=105373529027743&w=2

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 09:26 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ehatcher2003/05/28 06:12:04 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/OptionalTasks junit.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 09:36 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: There already is precedent in the task for this type of thing with the / if/unless capability. The if/unless in is more or less a mirror of if/unless in the include/exclude elements - it is meant to exclude tests when the runtime env

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

that mechanism rather than explicit support for if/unless. Erik On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 10:31 AM, peter reilly wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2003 15:04, Conor MacNeill wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:27 pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: If folks feel strongly about it, I'll revert it. I'm

Re: Ant file to create patch file

+1 - nice. anything that helps folks submit patches is a good thing! On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 03:06 PM, Magesh Umasankar wrote: Creating patches to submit to Ant can be standardized as well as made easier with the following patch.xml file. If you consider this useful, I will add it to the

Re: ChecksumTest fails

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 11:39 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Better don't touch filenames when using a case-insensitive filesystem, Erik ;-) I'm on Mac OS X. I did not touch any of the files (myself) other than applying Aslak's patch and running a build and run-single-test. Sorry 'bout that..

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 12:12 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: Personally I think machine-generated is the right approach, but we need to transfer the rules about optional attributes into the xdocs, then sit down and migrate all the current docs into xdocs form. Also, is xdocs currently runnin

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to kick off a discussion on what needs to be done to get Ant 1.6 to a release. I'm just going to ramble through some random thoughts I have been having in no particular order just to get discussion started. +1 on Conor to get

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hmm, if this is a pressing bug, we may as well think about 1.5.4 instead. I'd even be willing to wade through all those "small" bugfixes and merge them over to the 1.5 branch ... Not that I was keen on doing another 1.5 release, but if

Re: [VOTE] Jan Materne as committer

+1 On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose Jan Materne as an Ant committer. I think his contribution in recent months has been quite obvious both on the dev and user lists and also the bug reports. I think he would make a great committer. Here's my +1

Re: How to get Ant task Id?

You can use the taskName attribute on tasks to set a different name for logging purposes. Use getTaskName() in your listener/logger to access this name. There is no id automatically assigned by Ant, its set via the build file writer if you so choose. Erik On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at

Re: Q: Double-expansion - reading environment variables "dynamically" ?

from the ant-contrib project at Sourceforge is what you want. Erik p.s. No need to get impatient after less than a day of posting to the user list, especially on a weekend. Not to mention that this has been answered numerous times on the list and the answer is surely in the archives

problems with import task

I'm finally getting around to trying the latest features of CVS Ant in a production environment. The task will help tremendously, no question, but I've run into a couple of issues: - I tried doing to 's in the same build file, and the second import failed because it could not find the file, a

Re: From apache-ant-1.5.3-1-src to build ant.jar and optional.jar

On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 04:40 PM, Alexey Solofnenko wrote: Is there a list of jars/URLs and where they should be copied? I personally found some and put them into ant/lib/optional. Is it how it should be done? There is no complete list of everything you need, but there is a bit in the man

Re: problems with import task

tlds, dtds, etc. are deployed. I can post the task and sample build file if you'd like... m. Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ant-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tions.

Re: problems with import task

+1 :)) On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 04:32 AM, peter reilly wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 17:30, Erik Hatcher wrote: I'm finally getting around to trying the latest features of CVS Ant in a production environment. The task will help tremendously, no question, but I've run into a

Re: problems with import task

On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I'm finally getting around to trying the latest features of CVS Ant in a production environment. The task will help tremendously, no question, but I've run into a couple of issues: - I tried doing to 's in the same build file,

Re: Using ANT API

The PDF looked great (it was the only document I tried) Having your assistance with generating PDF from the proposal/xdocs stuff would be great! Erik On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Andrew Marlow wrote: Has anyone had a chance to look at the work I've done on the Ant manual yet?

Re: Ant Documentation

the proposal of Erik Hatcher (with xdocs) What proposal is that? Look in Ant's CVS in the proposal/xdocs directory. Basically the HTML docs are "legacy" and we will generate them from Ant's own source code using XDoclet to generate XML "descriptors" of Ant tasks that

xdocs - link to wiki?

What are folks thoughts on this? http://weblogs.java.net/pub/wlg/274 So forget about folding examples into Ant's own documentation - let's just link to the Jakarta wiki for them! Although, what about offline documentation? Good question - perhaps have a process that generates static doc

Re: xdocs - link to wiki?

On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I'd be very careful with pulling down examples for our tasks from a page that anybody can edit (mostly anonymously) and include it in our distribution as definitive reference information. I'm even hesitant to do it for online docs. Yeah

Re: Question about making change to BuildEvent.java

I think your solution is too specific to your needs (or at least its a rare use-case), and your best bet is to create your own BuildLogger/BuildListener implementations. On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Jay wrote: I have an ant project that uses several log listeners and loggers, MailLo

Re: [patch] MailMessage.java

Please create a Bugzilla issue for this and attach a patch file. Erik On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 03:30 PM, Michael Davey wrote: Hello, Here is a patch for org/tools/mail/MailMessage.java that adds the following: * Support for message encoding (alphabets) * Fixes to headers for w

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan

+0 - go for it if you like! :) On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 01:41 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO. +1 The plan: * We don't commit anything to the 1.5 branch anymore (we don't so so anyway). * On Monday August 11t

Re: [PMC-VOTE] Ant 1.5.4

+1 On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 03:09 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: [It is the PMC's responsibility to ensure that our releases are OK, so only PMC member votes are binding, that shouldn't stop anybody else from speking her/his mind.] Conor has created the 1.5.4 distribution, it can be found at

Re: Nested elements

Also, in addition to the information Jan has sent, have a look at the Feb. issue of JavaPro magazine (its online). I wrote an article that describes exactly what you are asking about. Erik On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 02:12 AM, Andrei wrote: Dear Antoine, the problem is tha

Re: Nested elements

Also, in addition to the information Jan has sent, have a look at the Feb. issue of JavaPro magazine (its online). I wrote an article that describes exactly what you are asking about. Erik On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 02:12 AM, Andrei wrote: Dear Antoine, the problem is tha

Re: [PATCH] Image scaling

Nice! +1 On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Rob Oxspring wrote: First up, sorry for no unit tests - just doing enough to get by for now :) Anyway, I was using the image task to create thumbnails and couldn't figure out how to keep proportions of an image but keep it within a fixed si

Re: ant task submission....compilewithwalls

On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 08:45 PM, Dean Hiller wrote: ok, I am a moron. I think I ran into the top of that when looking for guidelines and must not have looked down far enough. My apologies for being annoying. Anyways, what you are saying kind of worries me. I have no where to r

Re: Request

On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 07:06 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: when build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:/J2EE/j2ee_sdk_win ant builds correctly When build.properties contains j2ee.home=J:\J2EE\j2ee_sdk_win ant doesnt build because it cannot resolve JAVA_HOME PLEASE make the forward and back sl

Re: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 09:07 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi all, What I'd suggest is that soon we branch 1.6 and remove anything that is still settling down. I think we have a few ideas that need to be kicked around before we feel comfortable with them. This work can continue on the HE

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Did you try -debug? On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is it possible to add '-explain' option to see the real reason why a task cannot be instantiated? - Alexey. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Why the latest build requires explicit for

Did you try -debug? On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is it possible to add '-explain' option to see the real reason why a task cannot be instantiated? - Alexey. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: donate a new selector

There already is a in the latest version of Ant. I'm not sure how the implementations compare. Could you compare yours with it and offer any benefits yours has as a patch against the HEAD version of Ant's codebase? Erik On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 02:18 PM, Thorsten Möller wrot

Re: donate a new selector

On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 11:10 AM, Thorsten Möller wrote: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There already is a in the latest version of Ant. Uups, I didn't see this because I only worked with Ant 1.5.x. Always best to check with the latest codebase when adding new feat

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

It seems like a never-ending stream of these types of things. Obviously Stefan is very quick to apply these, but I'm wondering if it'd be better to just put a link to the Ant wiki pages and let folks self-maintain a list of these add-ons/extras. On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 06:47 AM,

Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

+1 i have no spare cycles in this timeframe (or the rest of this year even) to devote to this release unless something is really pressing. i would have loved the xdocs stuff gain momentum and be used, but by no means should it hold up a release. On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 05:58 AM, Ant

Re: antidote diff

/metainformation on tasks and types using xdoclet... I am not shure how far that went. I think Erik Hatcher has to drop in to this discussion to give further information on this! in proposal/xdocs is a project to generate XML descriptor files for each Ant task. this XML file contains meta information

Re: antidote diff

ppy. I do this: setenv ANT_OPTS "-Xmx1000m" you could probably get away with a smaller number, like 512. On Monday, September 15, 2003, at 04:52 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: On Monday, September 15, 2003, at 01:41 AM, Christoph Wilhelms wrote: Atidote was relying on dtd description of tasks

Re: [vote] Ant 1.6 : further release plan

On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 04:04 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: I am thinking about preparing a second beta on Thursday evening (October 16th). +1 I would also like to make the 1.6 release on October 30th. +1 - To unsubscr

Re: AW: Vote: for 1.6

-0 (don't object enough to veto it) I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6. Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big and (I think) beneficial impact on . The changes to macrodef are not Backward Compatible with the current implementation. The task declares prope

Re: cvs commit: ant build.sh build.bat

On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: well, we should decide whether building Ant on Win98 is important. Being able to run it there is important but building it could be considered less so. An option, therefore would be to drop Win98 build support. +1 on dropping Win

Re: task update

On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 04:13 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is to be backward compatible with previous versions of ant. Actually, my mail is a success mail 8-) we could do a really cool task with this XML

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

I am following this thread. I'm glad Peter got past his original issue. I don't have much bandwidth at the moment to spend on this, but will help as I can. On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 04:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:\ @ant.internal=true Internal setters not to be documented in the

Re: DynamicConfigurator namespace problem

On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 07:44 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: Christopher Lenz wrote: Hi all, in the light of a final release of 1.6 next week, I think the DynamicConfigurator issue with namespaces needs to be resolved. I can't believe I'm the only one who has a problem with the current impl

Re: DynamicConfigurator namespace problem

On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 10:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have no objection to passing just the localname if the other commiters see no problem with this. +1 If this means XDoclet won't break then a hearty +1 as well. Again, I

Re: [VOTE] Jose Alberto Fernandez as committer

No doubt... +1 On Friday, December 12, 2003, at 05:08 AM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I would like to propose a vote for Jose Alberto Fernandez as new ant committer. Jose has expressed a lot of interest in ant, and had made a very interesting antlib proposal. His contributions to the discu

Re: proposal/xdocs : Anakia versus dvsl

On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 03:31 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: anybody has an idea why in the xdocs proposal we are using dvsl to format into html the documentation, while we are using the anakia task for the rest of ant's web site ? Yup because someone stepped forward and contri

Re: Default setting of the javac includeAntRuntime attribute?

On Jan 4, 2004, at 6:04 PM, Kenneth Olving wrote: The default setting of 'true' for this attribute has always bothered me - from a CM perspective it is a bit of a nightmare when you get things in your cp that you didn't intend to be there. From a CM perspective, why not put Ant under control as w

Ant 1.6 - thanks!

Thank you to all that contributed to Ant 1.6! I have, unfortunately, been (mostly) out of the loop with Ant development for a while and am just now (believe it or not) getting up to speed on all the nice new features that have been added. Sure, I've known of their existence, and have tracked

Re: task

On Jan 8, 2004, at 10:43 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: Hey Peter, can't you code that? ;-) --DD I think that this is coded already using the jexl property support in proposal/embed. OGNL would be way slick also! -

Re: [VOTE] Bug Tracking System

[X] +1 Bugzilla sucks - go to Jira [ ] -1 BugZilla rocks - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] New Ant Wiki

So, please vote on this issue [X] +1 - I want an Ant Wiki [ ] -1 - I don't want a Wiki 1. send to the dev list (either directly such as BugZilla, or to an email alias as is done for CVS). Yes, changes sent to the dev list is fine with me - as long as they are sent to somewhere unique that I can

Re: ant xdocs proposals

On Jan 12, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: This one http://nagoya.apache.org/~rubys/gump/ant-xdocs-proposal.html is complaining about missing prereqs Missing prereq |/tmp/gump/xdoclet/target/lib/xdoclet-20040112.jar| from xdoclet

Re: ant xdocs proposals

On Jan 14, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: The advantage of generating the xdocs from build/classes is that it makes the development cycle a bit shorter. For instance, if you add a new task in your development workspace, then you can generate the xdocs as soon as you have compiled t

Re: [VOTE] Release a library with the SSH tasks for Ant 1.5.x

+0 (doesn't benefit me, and I'm purely at Ant 1.6 now) On Jan 19, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, I've hacked together some small build file snippet in the 1.5 branch that allows me to compile a stand-alone library for the SSH tasks. One of the results (the ZIP archive) can be found

Re: text support for macrodef

+1 On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: I would like to add support to to allow the text content of macros to be placed in the macro instance: use is like this: @{text} Hello world The textname attribute value becomes a macrodef attribute that g

Re: FYI: Blog "Complex build systems need a real language" found

On Jan 22, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Thomas Schapitz wrote: But, speaking of something else... misstakes like this might be partly due to a lack of 'ANT Best Practices'. Anybody thinking about including something about that into the documentation? Sort of like this?

Re: [VOTE] Include the Apache 2.0 License in ant 1.6.1

On Jan 26, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Do you want to include the Apache 2.0 license in ant 1.6.1 Yes [ ] No [X] There is no hurry to put this license in. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

Re: [VOTE] Matt Benson as a committer

On Feb 5, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: Do you agree [X] Yes [ ] No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >