cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ConcatFileInputStream.java

mbenson 2005/03/29 15:21:34 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ConcatFileInputStream.java Log: Sync Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.4 +12 -12 ant/src/main/

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ConcatFileInputStream.java

mbenson 2005/03/29 15:20:06 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util ConcatFileInputStream.java Log: Fix uppercase tags Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +12 -12 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatFileInputStream.java Index: Con

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34229] - Need ability to intercept calls to System.setSecurityManager() from embedded environment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34229] New: - Need ability to intercept calls to System.setSecurityManager() from embedded environment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33361] - Java.executeJava should install default Permissions and check ExitException code when failonerror=false for non forked calls

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

jglick 2005/03/29 13:49:03 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW Log: Updated from recent commits. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.503.2.210 +3 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

jglick 2005/03/29 13:48:36 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Updated from recent commits. Revision ChangesPath 1.798 +8 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30162] - [PATCH] Avoid potential memory leaks from IntrospectionHelper.helpers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntStructure.java

jglick 2005/03/29 13:47:59 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant IntrospectionHelper.java ProjectHelper.java UnknownElement.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper ProjectHelperImpl.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs AntS

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

jglick 2005/03/29 13:46:36 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java Log: Avoid hypothetical memory leak by not holding a strong reference to the thread or thread groups used as keys to report task associations. Revision ChangesPath 1.190 +7 -4 ant/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33361] - Java.executeJava should install default Permissions and check ExitException code when failonerror=false for non forked calls

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30162] - [PATCH] Avoid potential memory leaks from IntrospectionHelper.helpers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32941] - [PATCH] ExecuteJava should not catch ThreadDeath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecuteJava.java

jglick 2005/03/29 12:40:01 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH ExecuteJava.java Log: Merge of #32941: do not catch ThreadDeath when is halted. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecuteJava.java

jglick 2005/03/29 12:39:00 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecuteJava.java Log: #32941: do not try to catch ThreadDeath when is halted. Revision ChangesPath 1.50 +4 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/ExecuteJava.java Index: Ex

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32941] - [PATCH] ExecuteJava should not catch ThreadDeath

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26632] - rexec hangs

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26632 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 22:06 --- As mentioned by you, I downloaded the nightly build that was uploaded today i.e. commons-net-20050329.zip and tried to use it for rexec via ant. But still Ant just hangs waiting for some thing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27285] - [PATCH] Remove reflection hacks in AntClassLoader to support JDK 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/loader AntClassLoader2.java

jglick 2005/03/29 11:56:15 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java Project.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/loader AntClassLoader2.java Log: #27285: simplify AntClassLoader by removing reflection hacks (and separate ACL2)

cvs commit: ant CONTRIBUTORS

jglick 2005/03/29 11:43:50 Modified:.CONTRIBUTORS Log: Mentioning Tom Ball, author of #31885. Revision ChangesPath 1.49 +1 -0 ant/CONTRIBUTORS Index: CONTRIBUTORS === RCS file: /ho

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27814] - javadoc task does not encode baskslashes when generating file list by useexternalfile

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27285] - [PATCH] Remove reflection hacks in AntClassLoader to support JDK 1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31885] - [PATCH] Log JUnit TestListener events and unit test count

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTestListenerTest.java

jglick 2005/03/29 11:19:04 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTask.java JUnitTestRunner.java Added: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit JUnitTestListenerTest.java Log: #31

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31885] - [PATCH] Log JUnit TestListener events and unit test count

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

diff -b (was: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs input.xml)

By the way, this kind of diff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Removing old code testing for JDK 1.0 and 1.1. Index: SunJavah.java === -// JDK1.1 is rather simpler than JDK1.2 -if (JavaEnvUtils.isJavaVersion(JavaE

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs input.xml

jglick 2005/03/29 10:35:46 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util JavaEnvUtilsTest.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors PresentSelectorTest.java DependSelectorTest.java Da

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/unix .cvsignore

jglick 2005/03/29 10:27:37 Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/unix .cvsignore Log: Ignore stray dir that can be left behind after an interrupted test. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/unix/.cvsignore Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java

jglick 2005/03/29 10:23:47 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual/CoreTasks javadoc.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java Log: #30606: add 'executable' attr to . Revision ChangesPath 1.797 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25832] - Do not define twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The bugreport says you started w/ Introspection to > get > > here... I wonder if there is some way we can > combine > > this doc initiative with Kev Jackson's suggestions > on > > validation to set

RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The bugreport says you started w/ Introspection to get > here... I wonder if there is some way we can combine > this doc initiative with Kev Jackson's suggestions on > validation to set up some kind of element/attribute > matrix evaluation to define c

RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Beyond that, while I have DL'd these bug > > attachment(s), I haven't yet looked at them simply > > because my lack of expertise in this area means > that > > whenever I get into this I will have t

RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Beyond that, while I have DL'd these bug > attachment(s), I haven't yet looked at them simply > because my lack of expertise in this area means that > whenever I get into this I will have to refer to XSLT > references before I know what I'm looking at

RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little torn right now between 'too verbose' > and 'enough metadata' > in the XML vocab. I'm surprised at the lack of > response from many > committers too. I don't think it bodes too well for > this work. --DD DD, FWIW, as I earlier said,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25832] - Do not define twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30542] - Javac working directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22244] - Javadoc Task.. Don't use the JAVADOC exceutable from running VM

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25832] - Do not define twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RESULT] Retire Antidote - has PASSED

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I was merely indicating that I didn't really have an > opinion on something I had never or even looked at. Which is perfectly OK. > I didn't realize I was hindering the process, nor that 2/3 > majority was required, and fi

RE: [RESULT] Retire Antidote - has PASSED

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > and a +0 by Dominique Devienne. 13 of the 18 people currently listed > as non-emeritus PMC members or committers have voted and 12 of them > voted in favor of the proposal so we narrowly matched the 2/3 > requirement. Hmm, I was merely indicating

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22170] - taskdef classpaths does not work.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31555] - typedef / taskdef documentation should mention classpathref attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18945] - subversion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RESULT] Retire Antidote - has PASSED

Sorry about the delay, you may add my +1 as well for that vote. Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, one week after starting the vote we have the following +1s Stefan Bodewig Peter Reilly Martijn Kruithof Antoine Levy-Lambert Matt Benson Erik Hatcher Jose Alberto Fernandez Jan Materne Conor MacNeill Steve Lou

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18945] - subversion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[RESULT] Retire Antidote - has PASSED

Hi, one week after starting the vote we have the following +1s Stefan Bodewig Peter Reilly Martijn Kruithof Antoine Levy-Lambert Matt Benson Erik Hatcher Jose Alberto Fernandez Jan Materne Conor MacNeill Steve Loughran Bruce Atherton Jesse Glick and a +0 by Dominique Devienne. 13 of the 18 peop

Re: Future of Antidote?

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now it looks as if the vote thread I started is going to fail > because we don't reach our required 2/3 of all committers bar, No, I was wrong (and I happy about that), I dodn't see Jesse's vote prior to writing this mail. 12

Re: Future of Antidote?

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Nowadays most of the IDEs (all?) have an editor for Ant buildfiles. >> Antidote was touched 17 months ago (as I can see), for Jack Woehr´s >> I18N-patch. > > I had wanted to do more. Yes I know. > But

[Ant Wiki] Update of "Ant17/Planning" by JesseGlick

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JesseGlick: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning -- * Eclipse

AW: Validation of instance variables

Nice idea, but I think that´s a little overkill for just checking against null. Just checking the javadoc [1]: inherited fields are not catched by that method. Without having checked that, I could think that the AbstractCvsTask (I think there is one...) could contain some "must-not-null-fields". Sa