By the way, this kind of diff:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing old code testing for JDK 1.0 and 1.1.
Index: SunJavah.java
===================================================================
- // JDK1.1 is rather simpler than JDK1.2
- if (JavaEnvUtils.isJavaVersion(JavaEnvUtils.JAVA_1_1)) {
- if (javah.getVerbose()) {
- cmd.createArgument().setValue("-v");
- }
- } else {
- if (javah.getVerbose()) {
- cmd.createArgument().setValue("-verbose");
- }
- if (javah.getOld()) {
- cmd.createArgument().setValue("-old");
- }
- if (javah.getForce()) {
- cmd.createArgument().setValue("-force");
- }
- if (javah.getStubs() && !javah.getOld()) {
- throw new BuildException("stubs only available in old mode.", - javah.getLocation());
- }
+ if (javah.getVerbose()) {
+ cmd.createArgument().setValue("-verbose");
+ }
+ if (javah.getOld()) {
+ cmd.createArgument().setValue("-old");
+ }
+ if (javah.getForce()) {
+ cmd.createArgument().setValue("-force");
+ }
+ if (javah.getStubs() && !javah.getOld()) {
+ throw new BuildException("stubs only available in old mode.", + javah.getLocation());
}
...is rather easier to read if you pass -b to cvs diff. In principle a semantically important change could be skipped over, but this seems to be rare in practice. Do we have any influence over the CVS commit mailer script?
-J.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] x22801 netbeans.org ant.apache.org if I had known it was harmless I would have killed it myself
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
