> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The bugreport says you started w/ Introspection to get > here... I wonder if there is some way we can combine > this doc initiative with Kev Jackson's suggestions on > validation to set up some kind of element/attribute > matrix evaluation to define compatibility between > attributes/elements. Better yet, get this information > into a single XML format used in documentation and > referenced at runtime for validation and error > reporting... > > Does that sound un-doable?
>From my POV, I have more than enough on my plate trying to sort the doc out ;-) I'll leave you explore this. Until now I've done fine doing my own validation, with little utility methods like assertNotNull, assertNotSet, etc... --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
