DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Target Milestone|--- |1.7 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 23:31 ------- Revising strategy a bit. I am unfortunately not aware of any way to prevent some IH objects from being collected on occasion while the Class still exists, since the IH must retain a reference to the Class (e.g. it holds Method's defined by it) - and Java provides no way to make two objects live or die as a pair. This could be problematic for performance. However the rest of the patch should still at least be an improvement - no one in main Ant code would be calling IH.gH(Class) any more. IH.gH(Project,Class) will still use a cache, but this is cleared when any build finishes (not necessarily the one that asked for the IH, by the way). Interactive environments such as NetBeans do have to call gh(Class), for purposes of code completion, as there is no associated project - so these IH instances will not be cached. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
