AntForm project

2005-01-12 Thread René Ghosh
Hi, I didn't have much luck with the other list: I've released the AntForm project designed to to add form interaction to Ant scripts. the homepage is http://antforms.sourceforge.net/. I would like to get the project referenced in the external tools & tasks page. Regards, René Ghosh

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Peter Reilly wrote: > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > I can do that. > Is "define" a good name ? Here's one vote for "my". Everyone in the programming community would get that as a scoped entity immediately. -- Jack J. Woehr # The year 2005 marks the PO Box 51, Golden, CO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33073] - Tasks created by do not support nested text

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33073] New: - does not support nested text

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Updated: AntTutorialWritingTasks

2005-01-12 Thread ant-cvs
Date: 2005-01-12T11:50:53 Editor: XiaoyueGong Wiki: Ant Wiki Page: AntTutorialWritingTasks URL: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntTutorialWritingTasks no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ = Tutorial:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24918] - [PATCH] Permit console input to be sent to

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, possible. You say you're not sure whether that would make you feel better. What about you, DD? I don't like using clone() at all, but I don't have good reasons either ;-) I'd prefer that only declared types be 'extend

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Will it work, if I want to load a file into some "temporary local entity"? - Alexey. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Reilly
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: It does not say "local" anywhere. Should it be ? The "define" element does not create a local property, all it does is generate a value for an attribute. This value can be used for any purpose that the macro author may think of. The value is constructed so that a differe

RE: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
I do not think it needs to say local. does not say local. Remember, creates a string that is global. But every execution of associates the name with the new string for the scope of the just like an attribute name associate the name of the attribute with its value for the scope of the So,I pre

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > >On reviewing the code I am now seeing why I > extended > >UE; it contains a lot of code, as I'm sure you > know, > >for making these element substitutions work. Going > >with the ProxyElement (PE) concept, PE would be a > copy >

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
It does not say "local" anywhere. Should it be ? - Alexey. Peter Reilly wrote: I can do that. Is "define" a good name ? Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Reilly
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: I like as it is short, and it does not make any assumption about the usage of the name. (Notice that the name can be used for a property but can as well be used for a reference or something else. So, the original example would look like: The lengt

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Peter Reilly
Matt Benson wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: To be absolutely clear, no, Clone would no longer extend UE. Excellent ! Peter. On reviewing the code I am now seeing why I extended UE; it contains a lot of code, as I'm sure you know, for making

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > >To be absolutely clear, no, Clone would no longer > >extend UE. > > > > > Excellent ! > > Peter. On reviewing the code I am now seeing why I extended UE; it contains a lot of code, as I'm sure you know, for making these el

RE: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes, possible. You say you're not sure whether that > would make you feel better. What about you, DD? I don't like using clone() at all, but I don't have good reasons either ;-) I'd prefer that only declared types be 'extended', and go thru the

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In any event, this task has generated some > nervousness > > or distaste, > > Some of us will question any new task for its > usefulness, I find > myself a lot in that camp lately.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11325] - Add os.arch and os.version checks in EXEC task

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: or file collections

2005-01-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In any event, this task has generated some nervousness > or distaste, Some of us will question any new task for its usefulness, I find myself a lot in that camp lately. I still don't think I understand the motivation well, and I'm not

RE: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
I like as it is short, and it does not make any assumption about the usage of the name. (Notice that the name can be used for a property but can as well be used for a reference or something else. So, the original example would look like: The length of file '@{filename}

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33061] - OutOfMemoryError with custom Task in sub-build

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33061] New: - OutOfMemoryError with custom Task in sub-build

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: local properties

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Peter Reilly wrote: Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wouldn't mind having the two, and see what works best. :-) Sounds good, but is it possible to get a different name than "let" ? Hey, just propose a name for it. I am flexible... :-) Stefan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33059] - ant build fails due to a NoClassDefFoundError exception.

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33059] New: - ant build fails due to a NoClassDefFoundError exception.

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33057] New: - VSS tasks do not handle CRLF in comments

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33049] - zip (and jar) produces broken archives when duplicated file is taken from two places.

2005-01-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu