--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In any event, this task has generated some > nervousness > > or distaste, > > Some of us will question any new task for its > usefulness, I find > myself a lot in that camp lately.
I do it too. In fact if someone else had submitted this task I might well be questioning it too. :) > I still don't > think I understand > the motivation well, Again, the concrete use-case here is getting finer grain out of a fileset over whose creation the user had no control. Nested filesets would probably solve the immediate need. The justification for the clone task was/is "genericness = we don't have to do this n more times." > and I'm not sure whether I'd > feel better if only > ProjectComponents were Cloneable (possible). It's Yes, possible. You say you're not sure whether that would make you feel better. What about you, DD? > not something I can > explain very well, it just feels wrong. > > > and I must guess that if put to a vote it will not > pass (according > > to the bylaws re code changes). > > I wouldn't -1 anything because of a feeling. After > all a -1 without a > technical explanation is void 8-) good point... > > You'd stand a good chance of not getting valid -1s, > not sure whether > you'd collect 3 +1s Indeed, many committers are maintaining silence on this one... > > Stefan > > who thinks he's coming accross as a guy who doesn't > really know what > he wants lately - and might better shut up. I wouldn't say that. I have probably been coming across like a victim, if you want to get into self-deprecation. :) -Matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
