Peter Reilly wrote:
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't mind having the two, and see what works best. :-)
Sounds good, but is it possible to get a different name than "let" ?
Hey, just propose a name for it. I am flexible... :-)
Stefan's suggestion of "defvar" or "define-property" is on the correct
lines.
Perhaps "defineproperty name='name'" to define a property name accessed
by @{name} or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the value.
and "localproperty name='name'" to define a local property accessed by
name or ${name} to
get the value.
<#define >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
