+1 (non-binding) for apache-airflow-providers-google,
All new commits are tested except for two removals of deprecated code.
Shahar
On 2024/05/26 09:02:57 Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which
Congrats!
-Original Message-
From: Jed Cunningham
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2024 19:58
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Ryan Hatter
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Ryan
Hatter to become a committer and we are pleased to ann
way.
Finally, I'd like to congratulate Rom for co-joining as a committer.
Looking forward!
Shahar
From: Elad Kalif
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 3:02:52 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committers: Rom Sharon & Shahar Epstein
The Project Man
+1 binding :)
The AIP describes the feature well in all aspects, and I'm sure that
implementing it will take the executors a couple of steps forward.
I do agree with Niko regarding the overloading of "Remote", so terminology
should be revised.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 8:38 AM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS
+1 (binding).
Highly anticipated feature!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:50 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> I’m calling for a vote on AIP 65:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/T4qSEQ
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vvm43tfchyo92hmf40fqvmq0f5845bjr
>
> The vote will run for
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:43 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> I’m calling for a vote on this AIP 66:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ZIqSEQ
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8ksl144xd43jfk1wk3kz77t1xgbbq7z
>
> The vote will run for 5 days and last till nex
+1 binding
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 4:23 PM Tzu-ping Chung
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since feedback has died down on these AIPs, I’m calling for a vote on the
> first three Data Awareness AIPs listed above.
>
> AIP-73 Expanded Data Awareness
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/TAyTEg
>
> AIP-74 In
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:39 AM Utkarsh Sharma
wrote:
> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>
> I have cut the first release candidate for the Apache Airflow Python Client
> 2.9.1.
> This email is calling for a vote on the release, which will last for 72
> hours. Consider this my (binding)
+1 (binding) - it's an important feature IMO, and after reading the AIP and
the comments here - I think that TP's suggestion for compatibility and
migration mitigates the related concerns.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:44 AM Tzu-ping Chung
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m calling for a vote on AIP-80: Exp
+1 (binding)
On 2024/07/26 16:01:21 "Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brent and me have revised the AIP-68 based on the other Airflow 3.x
> discussions we had and as no further discussions are open we assume it is
> ready to vote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
+1 (binding) for both
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web
> Application for Airflow 3.0. We would like to open it up for a vote.
>
> AIP-79
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/A
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Yup, I am fine removing that language to make it explicit but leave it up
> to TP.
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 19:56, Daniel Standish
> wrote:
>
> > My concern with the AIP is the talk of support for incremental data
> > pipelines.
Congratulations Jens! You definitely deserve it :)
On 2024/08/06 07:50:44 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT]
> has invited Jens to become a PMC member and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Jens has contributed for a long time
+1 (binding)
On 2024/08/02 19:41:16 "Beck, Vincent" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-82 External event driven scheduling in
> Airflow.
>
> AIP link:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-82+External+event+driven+scheduling+in+Airflow
>
> Dis
+1 (binding)
Looking forward!
On 2024/08/01 20:13:00 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello here,
>
> I reviewed and - I hope - addressed all the comments so far. One most
> recent change in the doc was to allow a connection/variable to belong to
> multiple teams. Also I mentioned a potential future change
1. I'd like to cast my votes as follows:
-1: "builtin", "primary", "core", "base" - all confuse between Airflow's
real core and the new provider.
-1: "shared "- a "common" synonym, there's no point to rename it in this
case.
+0: "essential(s)" - it distinguishes the new provider from Airflow's c
+1 for #41039 - quite a useful improvement for the venv operator, includes
everything needed to use it properly
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:41 PM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
>
> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` scrip
Congratulations, well deserved!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 16:58 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow
> has invited Pavan Kuman Gopidesu to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Please join us in welcoming Pavan to
Congratulations, well deserved!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 16:58 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow
> has invited Karthikeyan Singaravelan to become a committer and we are
> pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Please join us in welcoming Kar
Congratulations, well deserved!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 17:00 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow
> has invited Gopal Dirisao to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Please join us in welcoming Gopal to their n
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:58 AM Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the adhoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> that it will end on September 30, 2024 08:55 AM UTC and until
#42004 - Simple is best :)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:10 PM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
>
> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats,
> we've identified the following candidates:
>
> PR #42004: Implement
It seems like I'm past vote time, but it looks great! (+1 from me FWIW)
Shahar
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 12:18 AM Ferruzzi, Dennis
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call for a vote on AIP-86 [1]. The discussion email [2] and
> slack message [3] went out six weeks ago asking for feedback, though I
+1 Agree, I do :-)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:12 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello here,
>
> Following from slack discussion:
> https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/C06K9Q5G2UA/p1732816777850809
>
> While responding to https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/44455
> (really nice that Astr
Well done Pavan! It seems very handy :)
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, 14:36 Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We have set up Cherry Picker Automation that supports both automated
> and manual backporting to any branch.
>
> 1. For automated backporting, simply add the required labels to your
>
Welcome to Apache Airflow!
I think that the best to do for getting started with Apache Airflow as a
user would be reading the docs (
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/start.html), as well
as watching Marc's tutorials (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEApEfa8HXk).
When you get t
part of it). would be
> > fine :).
> >
> >
> > We've done it so far :). And we can like continue doing so if that's OK.
> >
> > J.
> >
> > sob., 30 lis 2024, 21:22 użytkownik Shahar Epstein
> > napisał:
> >
> >> Due
Due to the fact that it's a publication that represents Apache Airflow -
Does it make sense to put such every new entry to a vote here? (could be
lazy-consensus)
That way we'll be able to somewhat monitor the entropy, and raise an
objection if anything in the text needs our attention.
Shahar
On
Well done, looking forward to using it!
Shahar
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 7:11 PM Pierre Jeambrun
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We just completed the migration of the public API to the new FastAPI
> server, closing a big one https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/42370.
>
> This new API is feature ric
Great idea, I support :)
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:35 AM Blain David wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The caplog vote triggered me to launch this proposal as it’s also related
> to unit testing, and as I think we want our unit tests as clean and as
> simple and as fast as possible.
>
> I think it would be
+1 non-binding
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 12:04 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on February 07,
> 2025 21:58 PM UTC and until 3
Thanks Jarek and everyone involved, great step!
Shahar
On Sun, Feb 9, 2025, 11:40 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a pleasure to announce that the provider's move to the new structure
> is now complete. We have no more providers in "providers/src". Many, many
> thanks to all those who h
Hey everyone and apologies for the delay - I'd like to appreciate
everyone's support for the Sphinx PR,
and thank Jarek and Jens for helping out :)
I'll cast my vote for #45627 - crucial step for supporting mapped tasks, so
kudos for Ash, Kaxil and Jens for promoting that!
Shahar
On Tue, Jan 28,
Well done! :)
Shahar
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 3:17 AM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> Dear Airflow Community,
>
> I am thrilled to announce the availability of Apache Airflow 3.0.0.alpha1
> for testing! Airflow 3.0 marks a significant milestone as the first major
> release in over four years, introducing
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 00:32 Jens Scheffler
wrote:
> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Reproducible package build, Licenses,
> Signatures
>
> Tested or checked code for #43591, #43659, #43851, #43901, #44045,
> #44158, #44070 and all looks good.
>
> Had a bit of challenges running with
I was happy to take part in upgrading Sphinx! The last Dev call triggered
me to do something about it :)
It was plenty of trial and error until we've figured out how to solve all
of the Sphinx riddles, but I'm glad that we've finally made it.
Big thanks to Jarek and Jens for supporting! Hopefully
Well done Jarek and Pavan!
Shahar
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:15 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello here,
>
> TL;DR; I just merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45266 -
> which implemented a much simplified and nicer workflow for our CI.
>
> Rebase to the latest `main` and you should be goo
+1 to this :)
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 22:10 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> It's extremely difficult to choose the PR of the month this month with all
> the fantastic job done by many.
>
> But I would like to shamelessly propose
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45266 -> Simplify caching
> mechanisms
Overall I agree that decisions should be made in the devlist.
One improvement that I'd like to suggest, though, is to have a dedicated
page on cwiki that summarizes all recent and upcoming decisions (votes +
lazy consensus) in a table, including links to their respective devlist
threads. We could h
+1 from me - uv is a great tool, improves developer experience, and it is
well-supported.
While acknowledging the licensing issues that you mentioned - if migration
from the current dual license ever happens, I assume that we'll be able to
find solutions for that.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Great job Vincent!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 3:18 PM Beck, Vincent
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47691 which sets
> SimpleAuthManager as the default auth manager in Airflow. If you pull the
> latest main branch, Airflow will no longer use the FAB au
Congratulation Rahul! :)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 21:20 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow
> has invited Rahul Vats to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Please join us in welcoming Rahul to their new role
Congratulations Shubham, Buğra, Zhe You, and Kaylan - you all well deserve
it!
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025, 14:05 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Wooo Hooo Hooo!
>
> In the midst of the Airflow 3 frenzy we had the opportunity to get a lot of
> contributions. And we had time to discuss who i
*8 minutes and 12 hours ofc :D
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 8:08 AM Shahar Epstein wrote:
> 8 minutes late vote for #46942, and kudos for #46939 :)
> In both cases - great job Brent for leading the UI efforts!
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:00 AM Briana Okyere
> wrote:
>
>>
8 minutes late vote for #46942, and kudos for #46939 :)
In both cases - great job Brent for leading the UI efforts!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:00 AM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
>
> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` sc
That's hardcore (pun intended) :D
Great work and good luck merging it!
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:28 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey here,
>
> I have a first (very draft and still requires a number of changes) PR for
> the final step of big refactoring of our projects and using workspace. This
> is
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:53 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hey fellow Airflowers,
>
> The release candidates for *Apache Airflow 2.11.0rc1* are now available for
> testing!
>
> This email is calling for a vote on the release, which will last at least
> until 20th May, 6:00 am GMT and
Great work Pavan!
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 10:58 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We have successfully migrated our documentation publishing process from
> github to AWS S3.
>
> As many of you know, our previous publishing workflow was slow and made it
> difficult for Airflow site re
+1 from me - the project seems well-maintained, and we should definitely
collaborate and open the "providers" door to Apache projects that could fit
well in Apache Airflow like this one.
If it proves itself well in the future, maybe we could think of deprecating
the "transform" operators in favor o
+1 for #50626
On Thu, May 29, 2025, 19:15 Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
>
> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats,
> we've identified the following candidates:
>
> PR #50626: Feature/implement i18n for D
gt; > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:32 PM Aritra Basu <
> > aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I definitely think there's potential to interact with an airflow
>
will be clear and outlined for future
generations.
If there's a consensus for my request, I'll migrate the contents to the
Wiki.
Sincerely,
Shahar Epstein
*References*
[1] https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/C0809U4S1Q9/p1748730841507939
[2] https://github.com/apache/airflow/
; > >> > in
> > >> > > >> the
> > >> > > >> > > >> context.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > There are ways to customize the FastMCP (
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> https://gofas
+1 non-binding
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 5:33 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means
> that it will end on June 23, 2025 04:30 PM UTC and until 3 binding
+1 non-binding
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:36 PM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> Hello Apache Airflow Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release Helm Chart version 1.17.0.
>
> The release candidate is available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/helm-chart/1.17.0rc2/
>
> airf
Welcome aboard :)
Don't forget to modify the CODEOWNERS to mention their up-to-date roles.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 1:19 AM Jens Scheffler
wrote:
> Lazy consensus reached. Merging. Welcome @TJaniF + @m1racoli !
>
> On 10.06.25 23:58, Jens Scheffler wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > alongside and after
abic locale (still
WIP) [2].
If no one objects within the next 3 days (17th June 2025, 9:30 UTC), I'll
assume lazy consensus and mention him in the CODEOWNERS file before merging
the PR.
Sincerely,
Shahar Epstein
*References*
[1]
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow-core/src/airfl
I also support the policy's relaxation for committers/PMC, and Pierre got
it right regarding the original intent.
I think of a supported language as a "niche", in the sense that a very few
people will be able to maintain it properly in the long term.
I support the statement that we could trust comm
Hello,
The internationalization (i18n) policy has been accepted.
11 "+1" binding votes received:
- Shahar Epstein
- Jens Scheffler
- Jarek Potiuk
- Brent Bovenzi
- Amogh Desai
- Buğra Öztürk
- Wei Lee
- Pierre Jeambrun
- Pavankumar Gopidesu
- Ephraim Anierobi
- kaylan reddy
3 "
+1, great job everyone!
Shahar
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 4:28 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> Hi fellow Airflowers,
>
> Following the newly passed Internationalization (i18n) Policy [1], I'd
> like to suggest and invite
>
> - @RoyLee1224
> - @guan404ming
>
> as Non-Committer Translation Owners of Taiwanese M
Congrats Amogh! Well deserved :)
Shahar
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 1:22 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Dear Airflow Community,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited
> *Amogh
> Desai *to become a PMC member and we are excited to announce that he has
> accepted our invit
I agree with Amogh that both #51699 and #51735 are great, but I'll go with
#51699.
Thanks for having my two PRs in the list :)
Shahar
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:04 AM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month! Shout-out to Kaxil
> for helping clea
t; >> BTW. I have not added pre-commit, just a script that anyone can run
> > with
> > > >> `uv run` - pre-commit would prevent adding new translations before
> all
> > > of
> > > >> the languages are complete so we have to figure out better ways of
>
+1 (binding)
I have a very slight reservation from using the term "human", as I can
imagine that AI agents will be able to use this feature as well. Maybe
"manual" would do better?
In any case, not too critical atm - the concept of enabling is way more
important :)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025, 02:39 Vikr
translation owners in
the respective languages (PRs are pending approval), according to the
definitions in the policy:
- Elad Kalif - Hebrew (he)
- Buğra Öztürk - Turkish (tr)
- Shahar Epstein - Arabic (ar)
For all of the suggested translation owners, language proficiency is
demonstrated in
+1 for #50626
On Thu, May 29, 2025, 21:00 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 for #50626
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:54 PM Buğra Öztürk
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for #50626
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:22 PM Brent Bovenzi
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Big +1 for #50626
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:
of the public API, I could also imagine using it to
communicate with Breeze.
*How do we proceed from here?*
Feel free to share your thoughts here in this discussion.
If there are no objections, I'll be happy to start working on an AIP.
Sincerely,
Shahar Epstein
*References:*
[1] Slack dis
+1 binding, will be happy to help in the implementation :)
Shahar
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 9:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello Airflow community,
>
> I would like to call a vote on "reloaded" version of the AIP
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-67+Multi-team+deployment+
I support option 2 with proper automation & CI - the reasonings you've
shown for that make sense to me.
Shahar
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 3:36 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As we work on finishing off the code-level separation of Task SDK and Core
> (scheduler etc) we have com
I'll go for #49470 - great work Jason!
Shahar
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:04 PM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
>
> With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats
> we've identified the following candidates:
>
> PR
.0 is out and internationalisation
> is released.
>
> Basically it can be out of date as long as the translation gap is closed
> for 3.1.0. IMHO
>
> On Mon 4 Aug 2025 at 22:13, Shahar Epstein wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to point out that the
Hey everyone,
I'd like to point out that the Dutch locale has been out of sync for quite
a while - less than 14% coverage, which is fairly low.
There has been a PR for fixing it, yet it progresses quite slow:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/51233
As we're getting closer to a 2nd consecutiv
72 matches
Mail list logo
