Re: [LAZY CONCENSUS] Adding Hussein Awala as a Code Owner & Translation Owner

+1 binding On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 5:38 AM Shahar Epstein wrote: > Hey everyone, > > According to section 6.1 in the i18n policy [1], I suggest adding Hussein > Awala as a code owner & translation owner for the Arabic language. > Hussein is a long-time Airflow PMC member and a committer, a nativ

Re: [VOTE] Adding @RoyLee1224 @guan404ming as Non-Committer Translation Owners and @jason810496 as both a Code Owner and Translation Owner

+1 you all have been doing great work! On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:28 AM Jens Scheffler wrote: > +1 binding. I see a lot of activity and would support welcoming all! > Thanks for the initiative! > > On 14.06.25 15:28, Wei Lee wrote: > > Hi fellow Airflowers, > > > > Following the newly passed Int

Re: [VOTE] Internationalization (i18n) policy

+1 binding On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:19 PM Aritra Basu wrote: > +1 non binding, good to see the policy put to paper > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 1:41 am Jarek Potiuk, wrote: > > > +1 binding - well discussed and prepared policy. > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 10:02 PM Je

Re: [DISCUSS] i18n maintanability policy

Thanks for starting this Shahar! It's been great to see how excited the community is about i18n. I love how many PRs from first time contributors have come in. But yes, we should agree on standards before 3.1.0 is released. I agree with everything so far. A few notes - We will continue to add esli

Re: [VOTE] May 2025 PR of the Month

Big +1 for #50626 On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:15 PM Briana Okyere wrote: > Hey All, > > It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month! > > With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats, > we've identified the following candidates: > > PR #50626: Feature/implement i

Re: [DISCUSS] Special Terms in UI Translations?

Thanks Jens for starting this thread. I am very excited to introduce internationalization support to the Airflow UI. Another thing we discussed and which everyone has been aligned on is needing at least one regular committer being a CODEOWNER for a language before accepting a new set of translatio

Re: [DISCUSS] Special Terms in UI Translations?

Actually, drop "Asset". It looks like it would be better UX to translate it. But it looks like "Pools" and "REST API" are harder to translate. On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 3:50 PM Brent Bovenzi wrote: > Thanks Jens for starting this thread. > > I am very ex

Re: [VOTE] April 2025 PR of the Month

+1 on 49532 & 49468. Docs are important On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 6:09 AM Ankit Chaurasia wrote: > +1 to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49532 > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:46 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu < > gopidesupa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Indeed, it's a g

Re: [DISCUSS] When a DAG is paused, change the dag run state from running to failed.

Yeah, if we do a similar endpoint we should filter it to only include unpaused Dags. We do check if the dag is paused during auto refresh in a lot of places. On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:44 PM Pedro Nunes Leal wrote: > A 2025-04-03 19:28, Brent Bovenzi escreveu: > > The issue is that du

Re: [DISCUSS] When a DAG is paused, change the dag run state from running to failed.

The issue is that duration is based off of start and end dates. If there is no end date we usually default to now. But that is misleading when a dag run is running but the dag is paused. Let me take a look at where we use duration in the 3.0 UI and see if we can reduce that confusion. We don't have

Re: [VOTE] February 2025 PR of the Month

+1 on 46942. 11 contributors to remove 93k lines of code in a single PR! On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:56 AM Blain David wrote: > +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46942 > > -Original Message- > From: Vishnu Chilukoori > Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2025 20:40 > To: dev@airflow.

Re: [DISCUSS] Time to say goodbye to the old UI?

Draft: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46871 On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 2:26 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis wrote: > +1, burn it down. You folks have put so much work into the new UI, I'm > sure it will be good to see it get its due attention from the users and > this feels like the perfect time. > >

Re: Airflow should deprecate the term "DAG" for end users

his hill, but I’m slightly concerned. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:00 PM Wei Lee > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> I’m not sure about adding ruff rules here 🤔 I think ruff

Re: [DISCUSS] Time to say goodbye to the old UI?

+1 - We absolutely don't want to have the old UI when 3.0 launches. - It's a big change that can't wait until the last minute - There are enough changes in main that the old UI is now breaking Please check out our UI meta issue for getting to featur

Re: New committer: Karthikeyan Singaravelan (tirkarthi)

Congratulations Karthikeyan, well deserved! On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow > has invited Karthikeyan Singaravelan to become a committer and we are > pleased > to announce that they have accepted. > > Please join us

Re: Airflow should deprecate the term "DAG" for end users

t; > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > > > >> externe. > > > >>>> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jo

Re: Airflow should deprecate the term "DAG" for end users

I remember we explored renaming "DAG" when starting on AIP-38 to modernize the UI. Both "pipeline" or "workflow" are more descriptive of what one is actually doing while Directed Acyclic Graph is an implementation detail. But I agree with Daniel Standish, at this point "DAG" has become "dag" , a wo

UI and API Contributions for Airflow 3.0

Hi all, As part of AIPs 38, 79 and 84, Pierre and I have started a new API based on FastAPI and a new UI based purely off of React. The current UI, rest API and webserver endpoints will now be considered "legacy" and will be completely removed by the time Airflow 3.0 is released. But there will be

Re: [VOTE] August 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #41390 On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:03 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 for PR #41390 > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:59 PM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) > wrote: > > > +1 binding for 41390 - subdags gone is a great step forward! > > > > Sent from Outlook for iOS > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Jens Schaffler

Congrats! The trigger form and UI improvements have been greatly appreciated. Looking forward to working more with you! On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:15 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > Congratulations Jens, very well deserved! > > Vikram > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 7:34 AM Vincent Beck wrote: > > > Congr

[RESULT][VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

://lists.apache.org/thread/bc8m1v29frs3w6ts80lc1sj7mo7g2m3z Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/k8txh306lsokvz9ok9v29pd20wjb3vs1 Binding +1 votes: - Brent Bovenzi - Jed Cunningham - Vincent Beck - Vikram Koka - Jens Scheffler - Kaxil Naik - Jarek Potiuk - Rom Sharon - Elad Kalif - Shahar Epstein - Wei Lee

[VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

Hi, Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web Application for Airflow 3.0. We would like to open it up for a vote. AIP-79 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-79%3A+Remove+Flask+AppBuilder+as+Core+dependency AIP-84 UI REST API https://cwiki.apach

Re: [VOTE] AIP-76: Asset Partitions

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:10 AM Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > Hi all, > > Kicking start the vote on the final data awareness AIP targeting 3.0. > > AIP-76 Asset Partitions > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2QyTEg > > Discussion thread > https://lists.apache.org/thread/3d80921801j6p23

Re: [VOTE] AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 2:12 AM Tzu-ping Chung wrote: > Oops, forgot to attach an end date /facepalm > > Let’s do the minimum since there seems to be not much concerns behind this. > > The vote will run until 4th Aug 2024, 6:09 UTC. > > TP > > > > On 1 Aug 2024, at 14:08, Tzu-ping Ch

Re: [DISUSSION] AIP-78 & AIP 84 Remove FAB as core dependency and UI REST API

Yes, AIP-79 to "Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency". There have been so many AIPs recently it's hard to keep track! On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 7:55 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > Thanks Jed and Brent, both of these seem quite straightforward. > > I am really glad to see the AIP-79 Remove Flask A

[DISUSSION] AIP-78 & AIP 84 Remove FAB as core dependency and UI REST API

Hi all, Jed and I have published two draft AIPs. AIP-78 removes Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency and FAB won't be necessary to run the UI anymore. AIP-84 UI REST API replaces our webserver views.py code when the public REST API can't be used. These have been organized as sub-AIPs, along with

Re: [VOTE] AIPs 73 74 75: Data Awareness with Assets

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:14 AM Shahar Epstein wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 4:23 PM Tzu-ping Chung > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Since feedback has died down on these AIPs, I’m calling for a vote on the > > first three Data Awareness AIPs listed above. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-68 Extended Plugin Interface for React Views

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:20 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > > > +1 binding. Very cool and needed feature allowing users to customize > React > > views in Airflow! > > > > On 2024/07/26 16:01:21 "Scheffler Jens (XC-AS

Re: [VOTE] AIP-65: Improve DAG history in UI

+1 binding On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 1:09 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > +1 (non binding). > > Regards, > Pavan > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024, 18:02 Shahar Epstein wrote: > > > +1 (binding). > > Highly anticipated feature! > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 11:50 PM Jed Cunningham < > jedcunning...@

Re: [VOTE] May 2024 PR of the Month

+1 on #39336 On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:14 PM Daniel Standish wrote: > As Jed said, many good contenders. Here's one vote for Kaxil's scarf PR > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39510. It will be really cool to > have some more data on what users are doing. > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11

Re: [DISCUSS] simplifying try_number handling

+1 Pumped to remove confusion around tries On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:01 AM Wei Lee wrote: > Thanks, Daniel! +1 for this one. This was confusing when I worked on the > starting from triggerer stuff. > > Best, > Wei > > > > On May 3, 2024, at 11:59 AM, Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > > Looks good to me

Re: [DISCUSS] DRAFT AIP-68 Extended Plugin Interface + AIP-69 Remote Executor

I like AIP-68. I have been thinking about the exact same thing. I think it can fit into either 2.x or 3.0. Before we take it out of draft I need to play with plugins more to get a good sense of how to actually implement it. On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:38 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Good work on the A

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:23 PM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (binding) Glad this is finally getting some love! > > > From: Ankit Chaurasia > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 2:58:13 AM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTE

Re: [VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

+1 on #36797 On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:39 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Thanks TP, for bringing it :) > > If I can split my vote between #37101 and #36797 - > that would be it > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:19 AM Tzu-ping Chung > wrote: > > > I want to n

Re: Looking for co-mentor in Major League Hacking Spring 2024 Fellows

I'm happy to help out however I can. I used to be a part of MLH and I'm still friends with the founder. There are a bunch of improvements we can make to the REST API that I'd love to see. On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:11 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Absolutely - devlist is the best place :) > > On Fri,

Re: The "no_status" state

Like what Jarek said, some of these dependencies might take a lot of work to surface correctly. But I am happy to improve the grid and graph to show more information, like integrating rendered_templates and more details into the Grid view. Mind to open a github issue for some of those smaller tasks

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

+1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:46 PM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 (binding) Checksum, signatures, licences and release artifacts look good > to me. Ran a few tests, working as expected. > > Le mer. 16 août 2023 à 21:48, Pankaj Singh a > écrit : > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Ran astro-sd

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc1

+1 (binding) On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:38 PM Frank Cash wrote: > +1 non-binding. I ran a sample DAG that heavily utilized TaskGroups. I > utilized Python 3.11 for my testing as well. > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:19 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > > > +1 non-binding. I ran successfully Airflow usi

Re: [VOTE] June 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for #31123 On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:39 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > My vote goes to another candidate > > UI Add Cluster Activity Page #31123 by @pierrejeambrun > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31123 > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:03 PM Michael Robinson > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] April 2023 PR of the Month

+ 1 for #30175 I don't think I've seen such a competitive vote before. This is great! On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:08 PM Daniel Standish wrote: > This is a tough one. Many PRs and contributors deserving of recognition > here. And cool to see so much engagement in the voting. > > But my vote goes

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc1

+1 binding - Brent On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:09 AM Xiaodong Deng wrote: > +1 (binding)! > > Thanks! > > Regards, > XD > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:43 Bolke de Bruin wrote: > > > +1 binding. > > > > Ty. > > Bolke > > > > Op ma 24 apr 2023 om 16:28 schreef Pierre Jeambrun < > pierrejb...@gmai

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

+1 binding On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:52 PM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.5.3rc2. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will last at least *48 hours*, from Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 9:50 > pm UTC > until Friday, March 31, 2023 at 9:50 p

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc1

+1 binding On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:56 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:24 PM Pankaj Singh > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). Our DAG ran fine against this RC. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:50 AM Josh Fell > .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-

Re: [VOTE] PR of the Month

+1 for #27063 On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM John Thomas wrote: > It's a new year and a new newsletter! This vote is a bit late because I > had to do some work on the script, but as usual it closes at 9a MST on > Wednesday, Feb 1. > > The script has highlighted the following, but feel free to v

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Pierre Jeaambrun

Congratulations Pierre! Very much well deserved! On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:51 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I am happy to announce that The Project Management Committee (PMC) for > Apache Airflow has invited Pierre Jeambrun to become a committer and we are > pleased to an

Re: [VOTE] August 2022 PR of the Month

+1 for 25610 On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:05 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > If I can vote twice it would be for: 25610 and 25888. > > Hard to choose between them, they are both really good and critical > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:00 AM Jeambrun Pierre > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I really love the new

Re: [DISCUSS] consolidate dag scheduling params

+1 to consolidating and "schedule". On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 10:12 PM Drew Hubl wrote: > +1 for ‘schedule', and another +1 to the importance of consolidating to > one being more important than the name of that one > > On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:58 PM, Josh Fell > wrote: > > Consolidating to a single sc

Re: Please vote on the PR of the Month for this month's Airflow Newsletter!

I also vote for 24249 On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:39 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Love 24249 - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/24249 > > My vote goes to that > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 06:23, Sumit Maheshwari > wrote: > >> 24284 >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 7:52 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >>> *

Re: [VOTE] AIP-48 Data Driven Scheduling

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:34 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Hi All, > > Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've caught > so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with Data Driven > Scheduling, and I would like to call for a vote on > https://cwiki

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.0 from 2.3.0rc2

Dynamic Task Mapping is a huge improvement! >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:34 AM Josh Fell < >>>> josh.d.f...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> +1 (non-binding) >>&

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.0 from 2.3.0rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:13 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > No, the same issue is fine. > > My point is that since this is no worse in 2.3.0rc2 than it was in 2.2.5 > it shouldn't stop the release of 2.3.0. > > Cheers, > Ash > > On Fri, Apr 29 2022 at 20:28:49 +0530, Abhishek Bh

Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling Dependabot security updates for our Javascript dependencies ?

Big +1 from me. Our current "process" is just me seeing an alert and remembering to check `yarn audit`. Dependabot will make it far easier to stay disciplined. Most minor and patch version changes should be fairly easy to approve even w/o extensive JS knowledge. On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:23 AM Jar

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate non-JSON extra, and require a dict

+1 On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 11:58 AM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > > > Should we provide some way of validating existing connections so users > can check this before upgrading to 3.0? > > Sounds like a good idea > > I think we may consider refreshing the airflow upgrade scripts > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2022

Re: New PMC Member: Jed Cunningham

Congratulations! Well deserved! On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:16 AM Daniel Standish wrote: > congrats jed! > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 9:14 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > >> Hello Airflow Community, >> >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow >> has invited *Jed Cunningham* to become a p

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:21 AM Ry Walker wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > can’t wait to see this elegant AIP materialize! > > > On Thu, Nov 18 2021 at 12:18 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tomasz Urbaszek >> wrote: >> > >> >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Disable pylint ?

+ 1 (non-binding) It's quite annoying to get pylint errors when I haven't even touched python code in a PR. On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 2:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > One more comment. Since the start of that vote (3 days ago) I think I > have taken part in ~10 PRs (I think ~4 of them were mine) wher

Re: [DISCUSS] Dag Calendar View proposal

Ryan Hamilton and I were talking about exactly this! Super excited to see it. I'd be more than happy to help out if you need it. Quick thoughts: - I wonder if we could provide more context at a glance than just green/red. Possibly a gradient of percentage success/failed per day? - I don't believe

Re: [VOTE] AIP-38: Modern Web Application

> > Consider this my +1 (binding). > > > Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both binding on AIP votes. All > community members are encouraged to vote. > > Cheers, > > Ryan Hamilton and Brent Bovenzi >