+1 for 25610 On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:05 PM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> If I can vote twice it would be for: 25610 and 25888. > > Hard to choose between them, they are both really good and critical > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:00 AM Jeambrun Pierre <pierrejb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I really love the new graph view for the datasets. >> >> My vote goes to 25707. >> >> Best, >> Pierre >> >> On Wed 31 Aug 2022 at 15:47, Constance Martineau >> <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Mine is 25888 :) The docker-compose warnings were really off-putting >>> and unfriendly. If someone is evaluating a new tool, Quick Starts are one >>> of the first places they go to and it's a bad first impression. >>> Prioritizing Airflow Standalone is a huge improvement. >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:30 AM Collin McNulty >>> <col...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> I vote for 25610. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have a tied vote for [25610] and [25888]. 0.5 each :) >>>>> >>>>> [*25610*] Grid logs for mapped instances and *[25888] *Prefer the >>>>> local Quick Start in docs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 14:38, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> [25888] Prefer the local Quick Start in docs >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25888 >>>>>> >>>>>> Why ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think this is a step in the right direction when it comes to >>>>>> communication with our users. >>>>>> >>>>>> With this one, we start to analyse how users are looking at our docs >>>>>> (this change was driven by our doc page analytics). But it's a bit more >>>>>> than that - we also deliberately engineer their "experience" (especially >>>>>> for the first-time users this time). >>>>>> We simply start to use docs as deliberate guidance where we would >>>>>> like to lead our users and take into account the "uses" of Airflow that >>>>>> we >>>>>> want to promote. >>>>>> >>>>>> We need more of those and more deliberate rather than accidental doc >>>>>> decisions. >>>>>> >>>>>> J. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 3:20 PM Michael Robinson >>>>>> <michael.robin...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey devlist! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It’s time again to select a PR of the Month for the Airflow >>>>>>> newsletter. The candidate PRs below have been selected using the >>>>>>> `get_important_pr_candidates.py` script in airflow/dev/stats, which >>>>>>> we’re >>>>>>> continuing to tweak. (Most recently, we added comments and reactions in >>>>>>> linked issues to the score calculation.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote by selecting the most important, interesting, or >>>>>>> impactful PR from the list below (or an entirely new one!) and replying >>>>>>> with the number. Voting will close on 8/31 at 6:15 AM PT. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [25509] Possibility to document DAG with a separated Markdown file >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25509 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [25888] Prefer the local Quick Start in docs >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25888 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [25788] Properly check the existence of missing mapped TIs >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25788 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [25610] Grid logs for mapped instances >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25610 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [25857] Add `RedshiftCreateClusterSnapshotOperator` >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25857 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>> Collin McNulty >>>> Lead Airflow Engineer >>>> >>>> Email: col...@astronomer.io <john....@astronomer.io> >>>> Time zone: US Central (CST UTC-6 / CDT UTC-5) >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.astronomer.io/> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Constance Martineau >>> Product Manager >>> >>> Email: consta...@astronomer.io >>> Time zone: US Eastern (EST UTC-5 / EDT UTC-4) >>> >>> >>> <https://www.astronomer.io/> >>> >>>
