rg/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpgdkv1opiG1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed?
More importantly, can someone confirm that the bug is really fixed in
xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.16.0-1 ?
Thanks for your time.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Fr
On Sun, 1 May 2011 16:11:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> The problem seems to occur every time I leave the boxes alone with the
> display locked, or even with just xscreensaver running (without locking
> the display).
> I raised the severity of this bug report, since experien
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:55:02 -0500 (CDT) Carlo Segre wrote:
[...]
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > what's the status of this bug?
> >
>
> Thanks for checking back.
You're welcome! :-)
>
> > It has bee
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:14:34 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Francesco Poli (06/09/2011):
> > I still have xserver-xorg-video-intel pinned to version 2:2.14.0-4 due
> > to this bug.
> >
> > Has someone tried to reproduce it?
> > Was it forwarded upstream?
> &
rectly, the patch has now been merged upstream:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-September/025414.html
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:00:48 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Francesco Poli (23/09/2011):
> > If I understand correctly, the patch has now been merged upstream:
> > http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-September/025414.html
>
> Still no 1.11.1 though.
I thought you
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:06:47 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:00:48 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Francesco Poli (23/09/2011):
> > > If I understand correctly, the patch has now been merged upstream:
> > > http://lists.x.org/archives/xo
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:18:43 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Francesco Poli (24/09/2011):
> > I thought you were going to cherry-pick the patch, once accepted by
> > upstream.
>
> Upstream has stable branches. There's a stable release schedule, etc.
If you mean
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:48:12 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Francesco Poli
> wrote:
[...]
> > Please give detailed instructions: back in the old times, I used to be
> > used to struggle to *enable* direct rendering. Nowadays, Intel
> > i
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:32:49 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 19:24:28 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I've just checked and I was not able to reproduce the bug with
> > xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.16.0-1.
> >
> > However, what I
tags 568684 - moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:41:11 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hello X Strike Force!
> Can you reproduce this bug on a box with Intel integrated graphics?
> Could you please help?
>
> Thanks a lot for your time!
I think I have already p
Please help me in finding the right package this bug report should be
reassigned to...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9C
n document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpVidWWNfcQp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ey-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
snippet_kern.log
Description: Binary data
pgpFM41AW7Ovy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:31:25 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I am currently trying to see what happens if I disable dpms in
> xscreensaver...
After disabling dpms, I again experienced the slowness issue
similar to #682816.
After leaving the box with a locked display, I type my pa
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:48:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:31:25 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I am currently trying to see what happens if I disable dpms in
> > xscreensaver...
>
> After disabling dpms, I again experienced the
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:28:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> I had found out that the issue vanishes when using SNA acceleration.
[...]
> and I am keeping DPMS disabled.
[...]
> Is there any progress on this issue?
These two issues (#714531 [1] and #682816 [2]) seem to have disappeared
Control: reassign -1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.19.0-4
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 22:54:20 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> If nobody objects in the next 30 days, I will reassign bug #714531
> to package xserver-xorg-video-intel and close both bug
> reports (#714531 and #682816) as
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:08:14 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi,
> I am deeply concerned about the news: it seems that Intel upcoming
> Skylake CPUs will require a non-free binary-only firmware blob in order
> for the integrated graphics to operate [1].
>
> As far as I can tell,
's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpUtdjYn5Y83.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d
> > highlighting, which then causes the visual bell to turn everything bold.
>
> It was.
Hello Branden!
Thanks for trying to reproduce the bug.
Does it help to know that I have:
xset b off
in my ~/.xsession script?
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a secon
inal-emulator-configuration>
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
! set a nice font
UXTerm*Font: -misc
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:04:53 -0400 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:11:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:08:58 -0400 James McCoy wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:23:39AM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [.
y many thanks to all the people involved in the investigation and
resolution of this bug! Great job indeed! :-)
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C
'll find the time and test version 2.3.1, as soon as it gets
built for the amd64 architecture.
>
> thanks,
Thanks to _you_ for your kind assistance! ;-)
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp8j6sSTyiEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:54:32 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> First off, let's reassign the bug report where it belongs (I've just
> done so).
> Then, let's see what can be done to help and get the bug fixed...
A little update: I tried to switch from EXA to XAA acceler
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:59:56 +0100 Brice Goglin wrote:
[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Anyway, I reproduced the bug with xserver-xorg-video-intel version
> > 2.2.1 and linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64 version 2.6.24-4.
A little update: I tried to switch from EXA to XAA acceler
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #478880
Here's the X log, as requested by Julien Cristau.
Contents of /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
This is a pre-release version of the X server from The X.Org Foundation.
It is not supported in any way.
Bugs may be filed in the bugzi
On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:24:03 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 04:01:19 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
[...]
> > Also, could you check whether the problem still occurs with latest
> > xserver-xorg-video-intel (2.3.0 is in experimental, and 2.3.1 will enter
> > u
On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:09:05 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Anyway, I reproduced the bug with xserver-xorg-video-intel version
> > > 2.2.1 and linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64 version 2.6.24-4.
Another update: I can reproduce this
On Mon, 19 May 2008 00:40:37 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Another update: I can reproduce this bug with
> > xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.3.1-1 (installed from unstable),
> > unfortunately.
> >
>
> Not surprising since the bug is in lib
on...
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpdh0Ym35FNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
package help in your case, as an
alternative method to enable external VGA output?
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.1.0-2
Severity: important
Hi!
I've just experienced an X lockup error.
My video card is an Intel 965G integrated graphics chipset (on
an ASUS P5B-VM motherboard).
My box was running the StonerView screensaver
(/usr/lib/xscreensaver/stonerview) and p
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #467319
Hi again, you are slowly turning my testing box into an unstable
one... :-/
Anyway, I reproduced the bug with xserver-xorg-video-intel version
2.2.1 and linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64 version 2.6.24-4.
Once again, the st
BTS (debbugs)!
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpkuXNY6KbqD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
duplicate of bug #364014 ?
Should bug #447084 be reassigned to libx11 and merged with #364014 ?
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979
Hi!
Is there any progress on this bug?
I still experience it with current libx11-6/2:1.2.1-1
Has this bug report been forwarded upstream?
--
New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
http://www.inventati.org/frx
. Francesco Poli
found 408666 243-1
thanks
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:35:38 +0200 Sam Hocevar wrote:
> reassign 408666 xterm
> retitle 408666 uxterm: bold attribute causes some glyphs to fail rendering
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > I think I am able to re
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:14:55 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I left my laptop alone for a while, then I came back and found it
> with its cooling fan rotating at full speed, and the image on the
> screen completely still (a frame from the screenhack that was
> running before the l
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:28:06 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Nonetheless, the test was not completely error free. Indeed, some
> > worrying entries were logged to /var/log/kern.log:
> >
> >
> > [ 582.975686] Xorg:5396 conflicti
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:22:42 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:28:06 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
[...]
> >> This looks like a kernel problem to me. It's probably the Xserver asking
> >> the kernel to set some memory ran
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:47:04 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance: adding what? where?
> >
> > Could you please elaborate?
> > Should I modify some configuration file? Which one? How?
> >
>
> /proc/mtrr lists some
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:48:03 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:35:43 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Now, it should be fixed in 7.1rc3 accordingly to the upstream bugs.
> > So I am marking as fixed in experimental.
>
> Thanks for your help
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.4+1
Severity: important
Hi,
I've recently found out that my Italian keyboard layout is no longer
working properly on my laptop.
ASCII characters may still be typed with the keys that show them
on the Italian keyboard (e.g.: the " character may be obtained
with Shi
severity 505033 normal
thanks
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:55:27 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I've recently found out that my Italian keyboard layout is no longer
> working properly on my laptop.
[...]
Mmmmh, all the reported issues seem to have mysteriously vanished on
the next
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.0.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #467319
Hi!
Thanks for uploading a new mesa revision to unstable.
I've just installed libgl1-mesa-dri/7.0.3-2 from unstable,
restarted the X server and redid the test.
Unfortunately I've just managed to reproduce the bug again! :-(
Aft
/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpbjidbW647R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ED]> 2008-06-15 19:33:25 PST ---
> Could you try the commit 82a0e82232d61a75fee39d50333016d78938450f?
> So far I can't reproduce it.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
. Francesco Poli
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:52:39 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I followed the described steps and got the following make errors:
> >
>
> Hum, maybe mesa is missing some dependency on libxmu-headers?
$ dpkg -l | grep libxmu | cu
ry freeze...
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpOM0CuB09u2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:05:12 +0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > No crash at all, everything seems to work fine! :-)
> >
>
> Good to know. When I saw your reply, I thought "oh crap, another bug
> that Mesa failed to fix" :)
Eh!
I hope I manage to find the time to do so...).
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpb95rrhQJ
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:09:21 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> But it's also OK to have the framebuffer console running at the LCD
> optimal resolution (that is to say: no special kernel parameter).
>
> Anyway, what's not too nice is the fact that the screen is briefl
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:56:46 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > I have just performed the test you requested, and I can confirm that
> > lat1u-16.psf.gz is OK (without X).
>
> Then I am reassi
On Wed, 27 May 2009 00:42:15 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any progress on this bug?
> I still experience it with current libx11-6/2:1.2.1-1
>
> Has this bug report been forwarded upstream?
Once again, I still experience the bug with current libx11-6/2:1.3
severity 561008 important
retitle 561008 xserver-xorg-video-intel: console changes setup after X is
started
thanks
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:32:00 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:56:46 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:32:54 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:16:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > b) console resolution becomes equal to the one used for the X session
> > (e.g. 1280x1024, checked with the LCD monitor on screen display), e
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:44:39 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:32:54 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
[...]
> > Or maybe the new version
> > of X automatically loads the framebuffer driver (I have no idea).
>
> No idea, either.
> How can I find out if
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:34:15 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> BTW, I noticed that I don't experience the same problem change on
> another box with Intel graphics, Debian testing and the same Xorg
> version.
>
> However, that other box has not yet been rebooted since the xorg upgr
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:05:19 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:34:15 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > BTW, I noticed that I don't experience the same problem change on
> > another box with Intel graphics, Debian testing and the same Xorg
> > ve
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:33:50 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 00:16:27 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Important update: after the upgrades I performed on last Sunday, the
> > behavior of my box significantly changed.
> > From last Monday on, duri
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:20:06 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 18:13:17 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > I am perfectly fine with having a framebuffer console, with the i915
> > kernel module (since I want to get accelerated Intel graphics in X),
> >
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:52:01 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 00:42:15 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there any progress on this bug?
> > I still experience it with current libx11-6/2:1.2.1-1
> >
> > Has this bug
retitle 624720 xserver-xorg-video-intel: crashes with xscreensaver and leaves
the screen blank (without login prompt)
severity 624720 grave
thanks
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:44:31 +0200 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> I think I found a regression.
It seems that the regression is wo
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:55:49 +0200 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> I found a number of kernel traces in /var/log/kern.log (attached).
> The times showed that the first traces were experienced well before
> I came back to the box, while the last ones were obtained during
>
Control: reassign -1 linux 4.6.4-1
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:47:40 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> After restarting the X session, I found out that the same issues happen
> even with the "intel" X video driver.
Update: I cannot understand why the behavior changed, but I a
Control: reassign -1 libdrm-intel1 2.4.68-1
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:06:47 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hence, I think it's definitely a Linux kernel bug.
> I am consequently reassigning the bug report.
[...]
Update: after today's upgrade, I tried to boot again with th
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:22:15 +0300 Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 29.07.2016 00:27, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > Hello again X Strike Force,
> > I found out another regression caused by the use of the modesetting X
> > video driver on one box (this regression doe
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97169
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:39:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:22:15 +0300 Timo Aaltonen wrote:
[...]
> > Thanks, I've reproduced this and filed it upstream:
> >
> > ht
d to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpvTG62SjwPL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.15.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
I think I found a regression.
Yesterday, during my normal daily upgrade (Debian testing), I did the
following:
[UPGRADE] xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4 -> 2:2.15.0-1
After restarting X, I did a number of things and
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.18.4-1
Severity: normal
Hello X Strike Force,
thanks for taking the step to use the modesetting X video driver by default
on most Intel graphics hardware. I hope this move will help in solving
the issues that many users have been facing in recent times with
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.18.4-1
Severity: normal
Hello again X Strike Force,
I found out another regression caused by the use of the modesetting X
video driver on one box (this regression does not seem to show on
another box with more recent Intel graphics hardware...).
Steps to re
75 matches
Mail list logo
