On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:12:11AM +0400, zmej serow wrote:
> please, help. x wan't start on my amiga a1200/b1240/32mb. it hasn't any
> nifty stuff like mediator pci :-) only default aga chipset, nothing more.
I don't think mediator is supported yet, aga should be, since the kernel has
a framebuff
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Martin Stolle wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> When building xserver-xfree86 4.2.1 from source, it fails to mention a
> dependency on g++. (I know I am run
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:13:08PM -0700, Pete Shinners wrote:
> Jouni K Seppänen wrote:
> >Package: xserver-xfree86
> >Version: 4.2.1-6
> >Severity: important
> >File: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o
> >
> >My computer is a Shuttle XPC SK41G, whose mainboard is the Shuttle
> >FX41. I a
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:58:46AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:40:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:03:46AM +, Markus Laker wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > > Version: 4.2.1-5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > X serve
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:24:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> What's the real problem? I'm running 2.4.20 (from Linux/m68k CVS) on my Amiga,
> with glibc-2.2.5-3? Or is this version glibc too old to exhibit the problem?
I am trying to build some 2.4.20 packages. The last version I tried
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:26:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > Sure; someone just needs to tell me what to grep for in /proc/cpuinfo for
> > the various sub-architectures.
>
> Better use /proc/hardware
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/hardware
> Model: Motorola MVME167
> [..
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:13:08PM -0700, Pete Shinners wrote:
> Jouni K Seppänen wrote:
> >Package: xserver-xfree86
> >Version: 4.2.1-6
> >Severity: important
> >File: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o
> >
> >My computer is a Shuttle XPC SK41G, whose mainboard is the Shuttle
> >FX41. I a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> #ifdef LINUX_INPUT
> if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", (common->wcmOpen ==
> xf86WcmUSBOpen))) {
> local->read_input=xf86WcmReadUSBInput;
> common->wcmOpen=xf86WcmUSBOpen;
> xf86Ms
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:54:45PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> There's so many bugfixes that it's easier to pull the entire changeset
> in. If there are no objections (and so far, there haven't been), pre2
> will include SiS and Savage.
In case there are objections, where do you get the source
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:11:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
>
> That's the one.
>
> > What are you using in pre1? The reason I'm asking is, that version produces
> > a videomode which is out of sync for my mon, while the previous, offical
> > ver
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> #ifdef LINUX_INPUT
> if (xf86SetBoolOption(local->options, "USB", (common->wcmOpen ==
> xf86WcmUSBOpen))) {
> local->read_input=xf86WcmReadUSBInput;
> common->wcmOpen=xf86WcmUSBOpen;
> xf86Ms
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:54:45PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> There's so many bugfixes that it's easier to pull the entire changeset
> in. If there are no objections (and so far, there haven't been), pre2
> will include SiS and Savage.
In case there are objections, where do you get the source
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:11:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > http://www.probo.com/timr/savage40.html
>
> That's the one.
>
> > What are you using in pre1? The reason I'm asking is, that version produces
> > a videomode which is out of sync for my mon, while the previous, offical
> > ver
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:16:58PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
> > Version: 1:1.3.0-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I am trying to set up a Dell D830 which has an Intel graphics controller and
> &
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 04:11:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Please wait until you see source for 10pre11v2. There's no point wasting
> your time building v1 since I'm committing some fairly important bug fixes.
MANIFEST.m68k for this version is on http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.0/
I th
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Looked at xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus yet?
Only so much as to use "generic" pci code for m68k as well. I need to know
where the pcidata module is defined. Shouldnt it be enough to just jet it
return silently? There i
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 04:29:12PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Looked at xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus yet?
> > Only so much as to
Hi,
the changelog says:
* updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
Christian
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:20:57AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the changelog says:
> > * updated MANIFEST.{i386,sparc,powerpc}
> > so it was not updated for m68k? :-(
>
> I
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:37:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Did anybody here ever (succesfully) try to get the combination
> of the atyfb driver and the XFree86 4.0.x ati driver to work
> properly ?
Yup, here! Working fine on two machines with RagePro. On the console I have
some pro
Here comes the new MANIFEST for m68k, I hope its not too late.
Just for reference: Build needed 18:30:59 (so that Branden knows how long I
need _at least_ to get a new MANIFEST).
Christian
Don't drink and derive... anyway, a few comments on this thread.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:53:52AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:46:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > > Could a cross-compile environment bring this down? Is there any *need*
>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:35:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> If you mean Egbert, I guess he's at least as busy as Branden. :)
Probably. At least Branden bounces the mail to somebody who has the time to
write "READ THE FAQ DAMNIT"
> Not so sure. I have such a machine here, and a BuildServon
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> arm).
Always on the small ones... X depends on glibc2.2? How could I build X on
m68
Hi,
I have a new problem with my self built X on m68k
XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 14 December 2000
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T . Steigies" wrote:
>
> > (II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> > unresolved!
> > Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbit
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Christian, I hope this solves your building problems.
I have no building problems, I have "loading" problems. But thanks for the
pointer.
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/potato
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 02:22:04PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Christian, I hope this solves your building problems.
> > I have no
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:45:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If the alpha or m68k people are having compile-time problems, I haven't
> heard a peep out of anyone about it.
It built just fine on m68k, but it does not work. I asked other m68k people
to try it out, but there was no response I
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:24:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Hrm, well, that kinda sucks. Prod him again. Is there anybody who still
> does bus-level hacking on the m68k anymore? Perhaps we can beg Geert?
Till a few minutes ago he was very busy with linux-2.4.0. I think now his
holiday
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:48:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Bah.
Oh maybe youre lucky. Hesaid X4.0 is next on his list, for powrpc though.
> Put xserver-fbdev on hold, and upgrade as much of XFree86 as will upgrade.
I reinstalled xserver-fbdev from 3.3.6 (should be functionally equivalen
Hi,
On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
(16-bit). From time to time I press the wrong function key when changeing
servers, like ctrl-alt-F11. ctrl-alt-F11 immediately causes the machine to
completely lockup, clocks stop, can't kill the X server, even the MagicSys
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:28:03PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Could you try not stripping the modules? I recall alpha having a
> similar problem.
Got a quick patch for that? I found it not very easy to patch X here and
there for testing (yes, I always build it from scratch) without adding
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:48:42PM -0500, Zephaniah E Hull wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:01:00PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> With 4.0.2 installed:
>
> ~> strings /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a|grep memcpy
> xf86memcpy
>
>
> memcpy is #defined to xf86memcpy in
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_libc.h
>
> So something goes very w
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:06:43PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>
> > "Michel" == Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michel> There is a SYMFUNC for memcpy which is guarded by
>
> Michel> #if (defined(__powerpc__) && (defined(Lynx) || defined(linux)))
> || defined(__sparc__)
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:05:58PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Thanks for all the hints, I will rebuild with the new gcc and libc6.
Same results with gcc-2.95.3 and libc6-2.2, so the memcpy patch (and/or not
stripping of libraries) is needed to build x4.0 on m68k with current
packa
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> As I pointed out earlier, PPC works without any PCI support.
Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
> > Note that I had to change an Imakefile to build stuff in bus/pci, because
> > otherwise a makefile wou
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> > Hmm, does PPC load libpcidata? Is there any special handling?
>
> I don't remember, but I can ask someone on the APUS user list to send you a
> log if you want.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have
> X4 uploaded yet.
I know that.
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:46:44AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Well, the X client libraries and the X server are separate. I'm by no
> means an X expert, but at worst I'd imagine it'd be possible to just
> maintain the old m68k xserver-fbdev package as part of xfree86v3.
Well, currently its no
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:36:54PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Some of us are particularly keen on getting the 4.0.2 client libraries
> (particularly Xlib and Xaw) as well as the most recent version of
> XTerm into a Debian release as soon as possible. There has also been
> a lot of improv
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of
> X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4 is added to testing
> (woody), the only thing that'll be broken is the X server, rather than
> a thousand o
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> >> (Actually, I'd like to see next week's XTerm in Debian. There are
> >> some pretty sweet patches pending.)
>
> CTS> I have a problem with uploading _next_ weeks xterm _now ;-)
>
> Please file a bug against the packaging sy
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:14:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Let me guess, your debconf priority is set to CRITICAL, because you don't
> want to be informed about things that might affect the above.
No I haven't. I did read that the preferred font size has changed, but I do
not remember tha
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 01:20:53PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> > No idea which libraries do not want to load, ldd shows no problems.
>
> did you try 'ldd -r' ?
No, but there is no difference. However that helped finding the problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>grep head /usr/sbin/xserver-configur
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:01:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually, hmm. Did you also manage to get xutils to build? The X4 versions
> of the fonts seem to depend on that package.
Yes, I have and it works with the fonts, when I also install xserver-common...
But startx does not work anymore
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 05:05:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Do you have xserver-xfree86 installed?
Of course not, that was the idea of this exercise, since the new xserver
does not work yet on m68k.
> This should only be temporarily necessary, until the 4.x server is working
> on m68k.
Yu
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:21:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:11:00AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On my i386 box I run two X servers, one on vt9 (24-bit) and one on vt10
> > (16-bit). From time to time I press the wr
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def) and
> run it in gdb?
This does not seem to do the trick? Linux-m68k/host.def now looks like this:
#define InstallEmptyHostDef
#define DoLoadableServer NO
#define
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:50:48PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:38:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > Can you build a static server (#define DoLoadableServer NO in host.def)
> &g
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:56:59AM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. There are regular howtos on how to
> build the 4.0.2 packages, both on potato and on unstable, but I haven't
Are these howtos still needed? I built 4.0.2-4 at home without build
trouble (dpkg-build
Hi,
this patch fixes the:
(II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
unresolved!
problem on m68k. Please include it in the next version.
Back to status pre ante X11 4.0 now crashes again while loading libpcidata.
Christian
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loade
Hi,
I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
which is not yet supported by the ati driver (and the rage128 fails
miserably to install..). Using the VESA driver works fine, however creating
the config file dows not work automatically.
I am running a 2.2.19 kernel and
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:31:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > I installed X4.0 on a Sony Vaio, it seems to have an ATI Rage128 Pro card
>
> There is no such mobility chip. What does 'lspci|grep VGA' say?
01:00.0 VGA c
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:57:34PM -0600, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 05 May 2001 18:08:15 EDT, you write:
> >I'm having trouble getting dpms working on a Dell Inspiron 4000 with
> >an ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF using Adrian Bunk's xserver-xfree86
>
> The r128 driver supports true DPMS.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I have space and fast access at
work, but only slow access at home (and no more sne
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:02:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:22:14AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
> > Is there a way to a
Hi,
[...]
MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README
make: *** [debian/stampdir/install] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20010620-2309
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:36:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> cp debian/MANIFEST.m68k.new debian/MANIFEST.m68k
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
Thanks!
> > So for the
> > build has run fine, didn't need any patches. Do we have hope that
> > somebody fixed the module loader for m68k?
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 03:48:58PM +0100, Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Again hi again :)
>
> I send to you second message about incorrect locale.alias, but got
> strange answer:
You failed to read between the lines. Imagine you are the maintainer of a
package which 10 million people are using. Ima
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
Doesn't build on m68k due to a stupid... idunno, is it a bug? Or just
unlucky coincidence?
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedant
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:52:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> > Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> Doesn't
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:15:43PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> >> At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >> >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:25:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 04:27:42AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > I know this has been reported before ([1], [2], [3]), but is there any
> > progress on that issue (I just got my shiny new graphics card...)?
Just use the old xserv
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:04:51PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> So, could someone else please take my patches and build and upload X for
> us? They're at:
>
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/311_arm_compiler_h.diff
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/312_arm_elfloader.diff
> > http://ly
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:20:38PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >Do you know if these patches could help makeing the m68k elfloader work?
>
> What's the problem with the m68k elfloader, exa
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can you run it under gdb and see where it crashes? It would be
> interesting to see the output of "objdump -r" on libbitmap.a and
> libpcidata.a, too.
Sure, logfiles at:
http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.1/
Note, this version
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you run it under gdb and see where i
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:00:05AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >* debian/xserver-xfree86.config:
> > [...]
> > - handle case where mdetect returns no output at all; also, break out
> > of
> >autod
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > gdm ignores it, too.
> >
> > I went to all this trouble to make session management nice for the
> > various and sundry desktops in Debian, and then all the other display
> > managers force people into the
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 04:53:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> hi folks, just upgraded to XF4.2.0 on my testing system from branden's
> people.debian.org archive (the netherlands mirror actually).
>
> now i can get to start with startx and it works perfectly (and sooo
> fast thanks to the 4.2
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:35:51AM +0200, Nicolas Boos wrote:
>
> > > [all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory
> > > `/tmp/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc/doc' make[3]: *** [all]
> > > Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory
> > > `/tmp/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc' make[2]: *** [World] Error
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:23:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:54:32PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > I believe that en_GB.ISO8859-15, not [EMAIL PROTECTED], is what you want.
> > The creation of an [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale before the UK commits to joining
> >
Hi,
if I understood the bug report correctly, all packages using xcursor should
simply be recompiled, and that is why the bug was closed? So why is
libeventdb failing to build on all arches?
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=libeventdb
Please file or reassign whereever this FTBFS belongs to
Hi all, Branden,
I found the list and subscribed. It seems to be unusually quite here...
Does it make sense to send the mail with the m68k specific problems and
patches again to this list?
Ciao,
Christian.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 11:36:06PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes. That's not so bad, though. So far the signal/noise ratio has been
> very high as a consequence.
Sure, but maybe you could announce here when you create new xfree-1 source
packages? I do not read devel usually and I do
Hi folks,
I have some problems with xfree86-1_3.3.4-2 on m68k, the package builds fine
(with my usual patches), installs fine, runs fine? Nope, X comes up, I get an
xdm login but after I log in, I get back to the xdm login, or, when I try to
run startx, X fails with a strange error message. In .xs
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Christian,
>
> I'm at a loss on that one. I forwarded your message to the XFree86 devel
> list.
I built the package again with gcc272 (Roman, can you put a hack for this in
sbuild, please? A failsafe one, I deleted all my gcc's by mistake allready
o
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is attached
Just a quick question, for building xfree on m68k I had to remove mach64,
imstt and pm2 from some Imakefile, since
Moin Hartmut,
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> One advantage for framebuffer is, that you must not know the video card and
> the X server. Video is in the kernel, x-server is fbdev-xserver. For mice
> it is possible to autodetect. Keyboard information comes from the first
> question f
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > No, 3.3.5 is also broken:
>
> Damn.
>
> I'd like to hear how m68k fares.
In principle, it compiles fine. All my patches seem to have gone in, thanks
Branden, just a few small probl
Moin,
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Martin Fluch wrote:
> I'm currently trying to compile xfree 3.3.5 under slink. The compilation
> goes fine for over 1 1/2 hour, but then I get the following result. Does
> anyboddy know, why the compilation fails and/or how to fix this?
AFAIR there are two changes necess
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Sorry for the wide crossposting.]
>
> xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the archive for alpha and i386
> yesterday.
>
> The sparc packages are in Incoming.
>
> That leaves arm, m68k, and powerpc, which I traditionally do not
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:34:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Please put the build.log someplace I can look at it and I will try to
> figure out what went wrong. I'll try the buildd failure page first just in
> case.
Tomorrow, I dont have it with me. I dont think that you will see anything
w
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 03:42:27AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:34:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Please put the build.log someplace I can look at it and I will try to
> > figure out what went wrong. I'll try the buildd failur
Hi,
maybe this is not the right list to ask this, but the experts are here...
I have two "problems" with the recent X.
1. when I log on master or va and start mutt, I get a black+white mutt, not
the full colored one. I can set TERM to xterm-debian there and mutt works
again. I noticed that on sev
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:02:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> My latest attempt at a final build for potato is there.
The latest or the final final?
> Porters/build daemon folks, please be aware that it's there, and let me
> know if there are any problems. The packages work fine on my box,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:55:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:18:32PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > OK it seems we agreed that libc5 support for xfree86 can be dropped on
> > m68k anytime (the sooner the better, last time I built xfree it doubled
> > build times
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> What is wrong with making a debian 4.0 package, and put it in experimental (i
> did not say woody, i know you have problems with upgrading unstable).
>
> Debian 2.2 user are using potato, which comes with 3.3.6-whatever and should
> w
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 07:44:05AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Source and i386 packages are in auric's incoming.
Tried to build them for m68k:
[...]
# install Debian's X server wrapper
install -m 755 debian/xserver-wrapper
/build/source/xfree86-1-3.3.6/debian/xtree/usr/X11R6/bin/X
touch debia
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:00:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:59:03AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I think what you propose is a good solution. I suppose 4.0.1 will be woody's
> > primary X server, will it not ?
>
> I expect it to be widely used, especially by peo
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> I remember running XF4 on top of amifb way back in the 3.9.16 days, i suppose
> this will work nicely on m68k also, if you can build the kernel.
amifb is not the only fb available for m68k. It might work for me, but I can
not see it, si
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:09:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Everyone except Christian Steigies did not see that. It was your
> imagination. Go away.
I'll append the last lines of the log, maybe its just mc68000 missing here ?
#elif defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__sparc__) || defined(__
Good News everybody!
I have been trying to build the phase1v5 packages on m68k. Seems I have
found a fix for the lnxResource.c problem I had at first, see first
attachment for the patch I used.
However, only shortly thereafter, I hit another problem:
[...]
making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86
Hi,
there are no source files available for phase1-v16, is that intentional?
Christian
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
