On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have > X4 uploaded yet. I know that. > At a guess, it's probably worthwhile uploading just the X client side of > X4 for m68k, which should at least mean that if X4 is added to testing > (woody), the only thing that'll be broken is the X server, rather than > a thousand otherwise innocent packages... What is "the client side"? Everything but xserver-*? Should I just remove them from the changelog? Just a broken X server means you can not run X on m68k, right? I don't think thats too desirable. But after all the feedback from the m68k users on X4.0 was not very high, so maybe X4 in testing is worth mor ethan a broken X on m68k.
Christian
