On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 19:31 -0600, John Wright wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.6.3-2
> Severity: normal
>
> I have a compaq nc6000 laptop, and the brightness buttons don't work if
> I use x.org's ati driver.
Do they work with Option "BIOSHotkeys"?
--
Earthling Michel Dä
Have you ever hoped to have a pricey Watch?
We have the soulition for you!
We have all the big names
for a low precentage of the expense.
www.qassdek.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever wanted a high dollar Watch?
We have the answer for you!
We provide all the expinsive brands
for a low precentage of the expense.
www.apokkij.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever wanted a high dollar Watch?
We have the answer for you!
We sell all the high scale
for a low fraction of the expense.
www.apokkij.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever wanted a pricey Watch?
We have the problem solved for you!
We stock all the big names
for a low fraction of the cost.
www.weggtre.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.J.Green wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, it's been very busy at work and
> I couldn't risk breaking my machine for the last week.
No problem :)
> Results -- starting with
>
> startx /usr/bin/xterm
>
> works just fine, while startx on its own fails to start
> as before (flash of the X grey, then
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:55:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390913: xserver-xorg-video-i810: blank screen after suspend
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:00:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414034: xserver-xorg-video-i810-modesetting:
dpkg-reconfigure doesn't detect correct video modes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> merge 374035 378549
Bug#374035: i810 driver in multihead setup uses wrong mode
Bug#378549: xserver-xorg-video-i810: xserver confuses monitor settings in
xinerama multihead setup
Merg
Christian Pinedo Zamalloa wrote:
> Brice Goglin escribió:
>
>> Christian Pinedo Zamalloa wrote:
>>
>>> Brice Goglin escribió:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding Xorg
and the i810 driver giving a black screen on your i
Does xserver-xorg-videointel 2:2.1.0-2 (currently in testing) help? Did
you actually forward this bug upstream as you said you would? If 2.1.0
still has problems and you want me to forward the bug, please let me know.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 395479 xserver-xorg-video-intel
Bug#395479: xserver-xorg-video-i810: blank screen
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-i810' to
`xserver-xorg-video-intel'.
> fou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 428796 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#428796: i810 and X-server hard-lock
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-i810' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> reassign 433144 xserver-xorg
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:18:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415227: Compiz interferes with Screensaver -- unable to
unlock a session
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:21:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426151: compiz move the windows start location when it is
loaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Kevin Brown wrote:
>> Well, what doesn't work? If you have hsize > 1, what happens when you
>> try to move a window to the right of your screen? or if you press
>> ctrl-alt-left/right? It should rotate.
>
> That does nothing.
>
> ctrl-alt-bottom gets me all the faces of the cube but left and right
On 2007-07-07 01:56:30 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The bug has always been there on this machine, which was installed
> in October 2006.
>
> I've just noticed that on the machines where the bug has never been
> present have:
>
> Driver "keyboard"
>
> but on the machine where
Brice Goglin a écrit :
Does xserver-xorg-videointel 2:2.1.0-2 (currently in testing) help? Did
you actually forward this bug upstream as you said you would? If 2.1.0
still has problems and you want me to forward the bug, please let me know.
No, I didn't forward it, but I think it's resolved and
Package: xterm
Version: 226-1
Followup-For: Bug #319822
Hello,
I think I can confirm this bug. (I am not sure it is the same, but I think so).
Sometimes, xterm dies when I open a program, for instance when I start "man
useradd", "bitchx" or other programs. aterm does not seem to be effected.
W
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 226-1
> Followup-For: Bug #319822
>
> Hello,
>
> I think I can confirm this bug. (I am not sure it is the same, but I think
> so).
>
> Sometimes, xterm dies when I open a program, for instance when I st
Package: xresprobe
Version: 0.4.23debian1
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I'd like xresprobe not to be called when xserver-xorg is installed and
configured on a chroot. This happens for example when you build a live
CD with the live-helper utiliby, that essentia
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 226-1
Followup-For: Bug #319822
Hello,
I think I can confirm this bug. (I am not sure it is the same, but I think so).
Sometimes, xterm dies when I open a program, for instance whe
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:28:51PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:40:15PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
> >
> >>Package: xterm
> >>Version: 226-1
> >>Followup-For: Bug #319822
...
> Well, the sometimes should be rather "with some programs". E.g.
Debian Bug Tracking System dijo [Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:51:17AM +]:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #421150: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Display is extremely slow in any rotation,
> which was filed against the xserver-xorg-video-intel package.
>
> It has been clo
Hi,
Brice Goglin wrote:
The driver does not seem to detect this 1366x768 resolution at all, I
guess your screen does not report it correctly.
You might want to try forcing a mode with the following:
* run something like 'gtf 1366 768 75' to get a ModeLine for 1366x768 at
75hz (or whatever refre
Enrico Tassi wrote:
> Package: xresprobe
> Version: 0.4.23debian1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> I'd like xresprobe not to be called when xserver-xorg is installed and
> configured on a chroot. This happens for example when you build a live
> CD with the
Hi Brice
Some more on this: With the new X reinstalled I deleted lines
up my .xsession file until it worked - but it didn't. I find
that fluxbox itself seems to be the problem
startx /usr/bin/fluxbox
fails as usual
startx /usr/bin/blackbox
works just fine. I tried some stracing but there
J.J.Green wrote:
> Hi Brice
>
> Some more on this: With the new X reinstalled I deleted lines
> up my .xsession file until it worked - but it didn't. I find
> that fluxbox itself seems to be the problem
>
> startx /usr/bin/fluxbox
>
> fails as usual
>
> startx /usr/bin/blackbox
>
> works just f
Makefile | 22
Makefile.mgw | 28
configs/config.mgw| 42
configs/default |4
docs/README.MINGW32 | 49
doc
Makefile | 22
Makefile.mgw | 28
configs/config.mgw| 42
configs/default |4
debian/changelog | 34
deb
debian/changelog |8 ++--
debian/control |6 +++---
debian/copyright |3 +++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit a85f9df09a002589efa5085d22f441161c00797a
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Jul 23 18:29:13 2007 +0200
Prep
Tag 'libice-2_1.0.3-3' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-07-23 16:30 +
Tagging upload of libice 2:1.0.3-3 to unstable.
Changes since libice-1_1.0.3-2:
Julien Cristau (4):
Fix the name of the XS-Vcs-Browser field.
Add the upstream URL to debian/copyright
libice_1.0.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libice_1.0.3-3.dsc
libice_1.0.3-3.diff.gz
libice6_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
libice-dev_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libice-dev_1.0.3-3_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-3_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libice6_1.0.3-3_i386.d
Accepted:
libice-dev_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice-dev_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice6-dbg_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
libice6_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice6_1.0.3-3_i386.deb
libice_1.0.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/libi/
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |3 +++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 3a547af84d736b40d78bab02e1a5752e19657de1
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Jul 23 18:57:16 2007 +0200
Sync package sections with the override.
diff --git a/
found 280579 1.0~cvs.20070721-1
thanks
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:39:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #280579: xlibs-data: [xkb] jp106 backslash/yen issue,
> which was filed against the xkb-data packa
Package: xfonts-encodings
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Hi David, hi Julien,
In /usr/share/doc/xfonts-encodings/copyright, I read,
> Copyright 2002-2004 Red Hat Inc., Durham, North Carolina.
> All Rights Reserved.
Considering that I personally generated most of the files contained in
this package, and tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 280579 1.0~cvs.20070721-1
Bug#280579: xlibs-data: [xkb] jp106 backslash/yen issue
Bug marked as found in version 1.0~cvs.20070721-1 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:22:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280579 closed by Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> (Bug#280579: fixed in xkeyboard-config 1.0~cvs.20070721-1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> This is a regression from 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11.
>
> I don't even know how to begin to describe the problem I'm having beyond
> what's in the bug subject.
>
> The amount of pinkness and inter
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:10:48AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I took two pictures of my monitor. The images are way too large to attach,
> > so I have put them up on one of my web servers.
> >
> > http://redwald.deadbeast.net/tmp/branden_grief_1.jpeg
> > http://redwald.deadbeast.net/tmp/brande
FYI: The status of the xserver-xorg-video-mga source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.4.4.dfsg.1-2
Current version: 1:1.4.6.1.dfsg.1-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning
Have you ever hoped to have a high dollar Watch?
We have the answer for you!
We provide all the big names
for a low fraction of the price.
www.apokkij.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever wished for a costly Watch?
We have the problem solved for you!
We provide all the high scale
for a low precentage of the price.
www.cafigge.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Brice!
>
> ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-11
> ii xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.6.3-2
>
> Still exactly the same, as far as I can tell. I just restarted X within
> the past day or two.
>
It'd be good to test ati 6.6.192 in experim
56 matches
Mail list logo
