Message to debian-x@lists.debian.org
Ola
debian-x
GANHAMOS O PRÊMIO DE MELHOR SITE DO RAMO
==Estamos operando em Novo Formato==
Confira em:
escuta21.kit.netou
http://www.escuta21.kit.net
ei debian-x
Cuidado com o que fala ao Celular...
ele tb tem ouvidos...
para remo
Message to debian-x@lists.debian.org
Ola
debian-x
GANHAMOS O PRÊMIO DE MELHOR SITE DO RAMO
==Estamos operando em Novo Formato==
Confira em:
escuta21.kit.netou
http://www.escuta21.kit.net
ei debian-x
Cuidado com o que fala ao Celular...
ele tb tem ouvidos...
para remo
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am probably not going to act on your implicit request (to trash the
>allowed_users variable and functionality).
>
>The reason is that, as documented in Xwrapper.config(5), "allowed_users"
>doesn't
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am probably not going to act on your implicit request (to trash the
>allowed_users variable and functionality).
>
>The reason is that, as documented in Xwrapper.config(5), "allowed_users"
>doesn't
Hi guys!
Could one of you please look at this and figure out what's happening?
mipsel is failing on FreeType (xc/lib/font/FreeType), specifically:
gcc -c -g -O2 -g -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 172
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
Log:
always disable FontLibSharedFreeType
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi guys!
>> Could one of you please look at this and figure out what's happening?
>> mipsel is failing on FreeType (xc/lib/font/FreeType), specifically:
>> gcc -c -g -O2 -g -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171)
> +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172)
> @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
> keyboard away from me.
>
>* #
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
This seems out-of-date?
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:08:15PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> This problem is already discussed on debian-x ML ;-)
> (A memo about this is updated, please refer
> people/ishikawa/memo.freetype)
>
> 1) This compatibility problem is introduced by freetype2_2.1.4-3.
> and revert it after
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
not everything. The current xf
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>>
>> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
>> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
>> not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196810 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not supported by
> XFree86 4.1.0
Bug#196810: Error: No Screens Found (X)
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196810 xserver-xfree86
Bug#196810: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not su
retitle 196810 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not supported by XFree86
4.1.0
reassign 196810 xserver-xfree86
tag 196810 + upstream
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
> Version: 4.1.0-16
>
> I have installed woody on my Tosh
retitle 196372 xserver-common: improve documentation of allowed_users
severity 196372 minor
tag 196372 - wontfix
thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:39:33AM -, Sean Champ wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
> PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I am probabl
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-10 11:27:27 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 173
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.install.arm
Log:
* debian/xserver-xfree86.install.arm
get this file up to date:
- stop shipping things that aren't built for this arch: imstt
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>
> This seems out-of-date?
Hmm,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>
> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
> that we should only use the cha
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > >
Package: x-window-system
Version: 4.1.0-16
First, please note that this is not a scream for help. Maybe others have
this problem too. I'm mostly offering to help solve a problem.
I have a PC-Chips M841LR motherboard. It has built-in video, which I
hate. The CPU is an Athlon with 1100 MHz clock. I h
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinuxInput Y
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 12:59:58 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 174
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/058_external_XrenderXftXcursor_X11.tmpl.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/059_external_XrenderXftXcursor_programs.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/060_
> * When doing a commit that should be logged in the debian/changelog
> file, edit the debian/changelog file before doing the commit and
> commit the change to it along with the rest of your change set.
As a point of interest, do you ever find yourself working on more than
one thing at a time
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>> >
>> > Yeah.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
> >
> > Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:20:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * When doing a commit that should be logged in the debian/changelog
> > file, edit the debian/changelog file before doing the commit and
> > commit the change to it along with the rest of your change set.
>
> As a point of interest
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:59:09AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Here is one more detail proposal to write each entry of
> debian/changelog. What do you think about this?
>
> Currently, we wrote each entries in debian/changelog to to file
> oriented, for example:
>
> * debian/control:
>
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
> > the change over to branches/4.3.0/s
As in the subject here is the error i get:
make[6]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/X/xfree86-4.3.0/build-tree/xc/doc/specs/X11'
tbl ../../../doc/util/macros.t abstract.t credits.t
CH[01][0123456789] App[ABCD]glossarypostproc | eqn |
groff -Tps -ms \
2> index.raw > xlib.np
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196912 xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86 4.1.0
Bug#196912: gdm video problem - including attachments
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196912 xserver-xfree86
Bug#196912: xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86
retitle 196912 xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86 4.1.0
reassign 196912 xserver-xfree86
severity 196912 normal
tag 196912 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:43:42PM -0400, Bob wrote:
> Additional info: My Windoze 2000 drive (in a drawer) lists the video
> driver as a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196372 libmail-sender-perl: missing build-depends
Bug#196372: xserver-common: improve documentation of allowed_users
Changed Bug title.
> severity 196372 serious
Bug#196372: libmail-sender-perl: missing build-depends
Severity set to `serious'.
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-10 15:45:46 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 175
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
clean up changelogs entries, add some bug-closers for upstream fixes
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196090 gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or
> validation in XFree86 at -O2
Bug#196090: gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key validation in XFree86 on
PowerPC
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196554 gcc-3.3
Bug#19
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:47:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:11:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I did attach a .gz text file... no more no less
>
> Well, your mail reader should have flagged it as MIME-type
> application/x-gzip, then.
>
> Anyway
[hurried reply]
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive. The goal
> is to make them more useful. My package changelogs have been doing
> double-duty for years because I didn't have them under revision control
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinux
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:57:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Your video chipset is not supported by that release of XFree86. You
> will need to upgrade to a newer version of XFree86.
>
> You can check the support status of your video chipset at the following
> webpages:
>
> For XFree86 4.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > > does not.. :/
> >
> > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traff
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to
> a few porters tonight.
You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs.
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
For Jack Howarth, the above
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:49:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [hurried reply]
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive. The goal
> > is to make them more useful. My package changelogs have been doing
>
[[[ Background for debian-68k readers:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-10 23:43:13 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 176
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/077_man_dir_and_suffix_cleanup.diff
trunk/debian/patches/085_bigass_imake_manpage_hand
Hi guys!
Could one of you please look at this and figure out what's happening?
mipsel is failing on FreeType (xc/lib/font/FreeType), specifically:
gcc -c -g -O2 -g -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 172
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
Log:
always disable FontLibSharedFreeType
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi guys!
>> Could one of you please look at this and figure out what's happening?
>> mipsel is failing on FreeType (xc/lib/font/FreeType), specifically:
>> gcc -c -g -O2 -g -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev
> 171)
> +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev
> 172)
> @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
> keyboard away from me.
>
>
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
This seems out-of-date?
--
James
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:08:15PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> This problem is already discussed on debian-x ML ;-)
> (A memo about this is updated, please refer
> people/ishikawa/memo.freetype)
>
> 1) This compatibility problem is introduced by freetype2_2.1.4-3.
> and revert it after
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev
>> > 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
not everything. The current xf
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>>
>> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
>> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
>> not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196810 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not supported by
> XFree86 4.1.0
Bug#196810: Error: No Screens Found (X)
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196810 xserver-xfree86
Bug#196810: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not su
retitle 196810 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] Radeon Mobility not supported by
XFree86 4.1.0
reassign 196810 xserver-xfree86
tag 196810 + upstream
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
> Version: 4.1.0-16
>
> I have installed woody on my Tosh
retitle 196372 xserver-common: improve documentation of allowed_users
severity 196372 minor
tag 196372 - wontfix
thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:39:33AM -, Sean Champ wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:01:22 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I am probabl
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-10 11:27:27 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 173
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.install.arm
Log:
* debian/xserver-xfree86.install.arm
get this file up to date:
- stop shipping things that aren't built for this arch: imstt
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>
> This seems out-of-date?
Hmm,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>
> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
> that we should only use the cha
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > >
Package: x-window-system
Version: 4.1.0-16
First, please note that this is not a scream for help. Maybe others have
this problem too. I'm mostly offering to help solve a problem.
I have a PC-Chips M841LR motherboard. It has built-in video, which I
hate. The CPU is an Athlon with 1100 MHz clock.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinuxInput Y
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 12:59:58 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 174
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/058_external_XrenderXftXcursor_X11.tmpl.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/059_external_XrenderXftXcursor_programs.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/06
> * When doing a commit that should be logged in the debian/changelog
> file, edit the debian/changelog file before doing the commit and
> commit the change to it along with the rest of your change set.
As a point of interest, do you ever find yourself working on more than
one thing at a time
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>> >
>> > Yeah.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
> >
> > Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, a
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:59:09AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Here is one more detail proposal to write each entry of
> debian/changelog. What do you think about this?
>
> Currently, we wrote each entries in debian/changelog to to file
> oriented, for example:
>
> * debian/control:
>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:20:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * When doing a commit that should be logged in the debian/changelog
> > file, edit the debian/changelog file before doing the commit and
> > commit the change to it along with the rest of your change set.
>
> As a point of interest
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
> > the change over to branches/4.3.0/s
As in the subject here is the error i get:
make[6]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/X/xfree86-4.3.0/build-tree/xc/doc/specs/X11'
tbl ../../../doc/util/macros.t abstract.t credits.t
CH[01][0123456789] App[ABCD]glossarypostproc | eqn |
groff -Tps -ms \
2> index.raw > xlib.np
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196912 xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86 4.1.0
Bug#196912: gdm video problem - including attachments
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196912 xserver-xfree86
Bug#196912: xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86
retitle 196912 xserver-xfree86: [sis] SiS 740 not supported by XFree86 4.1.0
reassign 196912 xserver-xfree86
severity 196912 normal
tag 196912 + upstream
thanks
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:43:42PM -0400, Bob wrote:
> Additional info: My Windoze 2000 drive (in a drawer) lists the video
> driver as a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196372 libmail-sender-perl: missing build-depends
Bug#196372: xserver-common: improve documentation of allowed_users
Changed Bug title.
> severity 196372 serious
Bug#196372: libmail-sender-perl: missing build-depends
Severity set to `serious'.
Author: branden
Date: 2003-06-10 15:45:46 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 175
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
clean up changelogs entries, add some bug-closers for upstream fixes
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 196090 gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or
> validation in XFree86 at -O2
Bug#196090: gcc-3.3: miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key validation in XFree86
on PowerPC
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 196554 gcc-3.3
Bug#19
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:47:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:11:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I did attach a .gz text file... no more no less
>
> Well, your mail reader should have flagged it as MIME-type
> application/x-gzip, then.
>
> Anyway
[hurried reply]
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive. The goal
> is to make them more useful. My package changelogs have been doing
> double-duty for years because I didn't have them under revision control
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinux
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:57:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Your video chipset is not supported by that release of XFree86. You
> will need to upgrade to a newer version of XFree86.
>
> You can check the support status of your video chipset at the following
> webpages:
>
> For XFree86 4.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > > does not.. :/
> >
> > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traff
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to
> a few porters tonight.
You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs.
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
For Jack Howarth, the above
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:49:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [hurried reply]
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive. The goal
> > is to make them more useful. My package changelogs have been doing
>
[[[ Background for debian-68k readers:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7
85 matches
Mail list logo
