On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > > > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) > > > > Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was > > that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, > > not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have > > our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting > > people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should > > Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of > > thing. :) > > I think you are misremembering a little bit, or misapplying our > agreement to the instant case. > > Here's my proposal for commit and changelog handling for the X Strike > Force. These points are not very well organized because I'm writing > this mail in a hurry. If there is agreement on these points I'll add > them to the top-level README. [SNIP]
It is more than fine for me. Thanks Fabio -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
