>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;) >> >> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was >> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing, >> not everything. The current xfree86 changelogs are massive, and we have >> our revision control system to fully log everything. Plus, crediting >> people right is a pain - what if two people work on something? Should >> Branden be credited? How much contribution gets a credit? That sort of >> thing. :) Ah, I agree this point of view. OK, I'll write only these thning to debian/changelog, more details will be written to commitlog. Thanks :-) -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
